in

ELP's Air Power Blog

A blog about military air power: The good, the bad and the ugly.

September 2008 - Posts

  • Nov. Osprey Fire Caused by Hydraulic Failure

    Christian over at DefenseTech has a great story about that mishap last November... - Ouch -
    I've gotten my hands on an investigation report into the fire that nearly destroyed an MV-22 back in November during an NVG training flight near New River, N.C. Turns out, the fire sparked after the #3 hydraulic system ruptured due to pressure spikes from the engine air particle separator which filters inlet air before it is ingested by the engine. The hydraulic fluid spilled all over the IR suppression system, igniting the left nacelle into a ball of flame. The pilots and crew landed safely but the nacelle was a melted, twisted hulk. It caused $16 million in damages.
    Full Story... Developing: Hydraulic Failure Caused Nov. Osprey Fire
    Posted Sep 30 2008, 10:06 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under:
  • Flanker Development Forks

    Chinese J-11B Flanker fighter aircraftSo what will the Pacific air power threats look like in the coming years? One answer is that the Flanker has taken a fork in it's development with the Chinese adding some home equipment for their J-11B. What has started as a knock-off is moving forward based on a domestic manufacturing development spiral. No matter what one thinks of the Flanker, it does have growth room.

    The F-22 can't be everywhere. Which means that in the coming years, if the U.S. goes on the warpath, it might find some areas a bit more contested. With words like this from the U.S. Army it is only a matter of time before the financial problems of an in-debt U.S. takes it's toll on U.S. defense procurement and U.S. recapitalization of modern aircraft.  U.S. defense procurement has a tradition of cost over-runs that may have gotten it though the cold war, but will now be faced by an ever less tolerant U.S. Congress trying to pay all the bills.

    With the realities facing the U.S. Air Force, funding everything to do today's mission isn't just about fighter aircraft. Not by a long shot. It is now safe to say that  over the next 20 years  the U.S. Air Force will shrink. There won't be anything close to the current numbers of U.S. fighter aircraft. The air domination monopoly enjoyed by the U.S. for a very long time may struggle in a future war. Add to this, that the path taken by the U.S. Navy's future composition of shooter aircraft is not written. Fortunately the U.S Navy, ship building troubles and all, has an inexpensive solution to put at least something on the deck with a new car smell should other options run into trouble. The U.S. will need a serious rethink on military force composition if they want to be effective in future Pacific Rim security operations. Where will the money come from?
    Posted Sep 30 2008, 08:09 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under: ,
  • Talk of UK F-35 Pull-Out is no Surprise

     UK future aircraft carrier

    The Times Online is reporting that the Ministry of Defence and Parliament  are up to no good again: Cutting the UK military to the bone. Is that being fair? Yes and no. Yes the MOD and Parliament have shown a trend of cutting the military for a very long time. What is stressing the budget out? Paying for the war. And it is possible that the UK military may never see an F-35.

    All of the forces have been pushed to the extreme. The RAF is putting an unusual amount of flying hours on their aircraft: Both shooters and support. For example Tornados and Herks are burning up flying hours at an alarming rate. There is no end in sight to the consumption of airframe life. Running a war on a military that was already pretty thin has taken it's toll in other areas too. The Navy and Army have been thinned out to the breaking point. While there are many dedicated servicepeople, the UK military is a shell of what it once was and the situation is getting worse.

    Will the UK order F-35B STOVL aircraft? It could go either way. The UK MOD and Parliament are at a fork in the road. Even if the F-35 program goes near perfect and Lockheed Martin gets good news from their suppliers and can offer all JSF Team Partners an extra good price, it might already be too late. No  matter what price is offered, Humpty Dumpty can't be put back together again. UK budget planning may well have already gone into the abyss.

    Making a naval variant of the Typhoon and converting the planned new RN carriers for catapult and hook landing ops won't be cheap either. It is unknown what the effect will be on the F-35 program if the UK MOD doesn't buy. What is guarenteed though is that the MOD and Parliament will keep right on cutting. The war effort is now a bleeding ucler for budget planners. UK military financial problems will get worse before they get better.  

    Posted Sep 29 2008, 07:50 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under: ,
  • Possible AIM-9X, Link-16, Radar Upgrades for Saudi Arabia

    AIM-9X air to air missile

    The U.S. Defense Department has notified the U.S. Congress of the possibility of more mil hardware sales to Saudi Arabia.

    Link-16 for Saudi Arabia's Typhoons. (PDF here)

    The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Saudi Arabia of Multifunctional Information Distribution System/Low Volume Terminals as well as associated equipment and services. The total value, if all options are exercised, could be as high as $31 million. The Government of Saudi Arabia has requested a possible sale of 80 Link 16 Multifunctional Information Distribution System/Low Volume Terminals (MIDS/LVT-1) to be installed on United Kingdom Eurofighter Typhoon aircraft, data transfer devices, installation, testing, spare and repair parts, support equipment, personnel training, training equipment, contractor engineering and technical support, and other related elements of program support. The estimated cost is $31 million.

    AIM-9X for Saudi Air Force. The jet that will hang these is not mentioned (F-15?) (PDF here)

    The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Saudi Arabia of AIM-9X SIDEWINDER missiles as well as associated equipment and services. The total value, if all options are exercised, could be as high as $164 million. The Government of Saudi Arabia has requested a possible sale of 250 All-Up-Round AIM-9X SIDEWINDER Missiles, 84 AIM-9X SIDEWINDER Captive Air Training Missiles (CATMs), 12 AIM-9X SIDEWINDER Dummy Air Training Missiles (DATMs), missile containers, missile modifications, test sets and support equipment, spare and repair parts, publications and technical data, maintenance, personnel training and training equipment, contractor engineering and technical support services, and other related elements of logistics support. The estimated cost is $164 million. This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been and continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East. The sale of the AIM-9X SIDEWINDER missile system will significantly enhance the Royal Saudi Arabia Air Force's current air-to-air intercept capability. Saudi Arabia will have no difficulty absorbing these additional missiles into its armed forces.

    And finally, upgrades for Saudia Arabia's AN/FPS-117 early warning radars. (PDF here)

    The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress of a possible Foreign Military Sale to Saudi Arabia of AN/FPS-117 Long Range Radar Upgrade as well as associated equipment and services. The total value, if all options are exercised, could be as high as $145 million. The Government of Saudi Arabia has requested a possible equipment upgrade of 17 AN/FPS-117 radars, which includes installation and checkout, engineering, calibration, reintegration, testing, support equipment, spare and repair parts, personnel training, publications and technical data, U.S. Government and contractor technical assistance and other related elements of logistics support. The estimated cost is $145 million. This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a friendly country that has been and continues to be an important force for political stability and economic progress in the Middle East. The proposed upgrade of this radar will extend the operational life of the existing radars and will lower operation and maintenance requirements and lower cost by reducing the number of line replaceable units.
    Posted Sep 28 2008, 04:10 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under:
  • Meet DAS

    Cool NG video on the DAS that will be on the F-35. There are some serious holes in the video, but hey it's the seller hyping their stuff. Fun to watch.

    Posted Sep 28 2008, 03:13 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under:
  • C-17 For Europe Moves Ahead

    Via Robert Wall and Douglas Barrie of Aviation Week, NATO will go ahead with an agreement to get C-17s. NATO will base the aircraft at Papa air base in Hungary.
    -The 12 participants so far are: Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United States. The Czech Republic is still debating the issue, but chances are seen as slim they will commit. Italy has asked for an extension to sign-up until December.-
    Since a C-17 can't do the big cargo of a C-5 or an AN-124, this agreement won't take AN-124 rental lift completely out of the picture. Of course Sweden and Finland aren't in NATO.

    Posted Sep 28 2008, 03:04 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under:
  • JASSM Survivability, JASSM Cost

    Around 87% now in scripted range events for the JASSM. Sounds good. But now with the supposed fix of failures from 2007, the JASSM won't be all that affordable. It was supposed to be around $400-500,000 per missile however paying for the fixes and delays means that cost will increase quite a bit. Then too how many targets are worth that kind of a war shot? Also, what is the shelf life?

    Survivability: Big question. JASSM is supposed to have some stealthy quality to it. The downside of that is that the U.S. can only export minimal stealth technology. When you start looking at other survivability issues it starts to get a bit worrisome.

    The missile doesn't do terrain following like the Tomahawk cruise missile. It was never a requirement. Something slow and subsonic has to be terrain following in order to take maximum advantage of the radar horizon or these days, the sensor horizon. With infra-red detection and tracking anti-aircraft systems gaining, minimal stealth, not much speed (Mach 0.7) and no terrain following, JASSM might be good vs. 3rd stringers but like aircraft, it will need lots of support from off-board jamming and maybe even fighter escort.

    Currently there is work being funded by Australia to give it anti-ship ability. With the above mentioned qualities and price, Harpoon and SLAM-ER are a much better value. If you are into government/industry  buzz-words like "low risk", Harpoon and SLAM-ER, especially the latter with proven networking come out on top for a variety of targets that don't need a gold-plated war shot. Harpoon and SLAM-ER are not cheap, but they carry a lot more value in the long run. Consider that weapons certification for SLAM-ER should show up on the Super Hornet this year for the U.S. Navy. Australia can reap more value from that when their first Super Hornet squadron stands up in the near future.

    Posted Sep 28 2008, 02:57 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under:
  • 12 Hours Away

    Flight Global's Stephen Trimble found a fun video. In order for low observable aircraft to be effective vs. strong air defenses,  you need good stand-off jamming. Low observable aircraft  with vertical tails aren't very stealthy against lower band search radars. Even though it is a Boeing video, it does show the fact that the F-22 is the only survivable fighter to drive into a stiff first team enemy air defense.

    The pauper USAF after some goof ups, has been very slow at getting the very much needed stand-off jamming capability into the B-52. While one plan shows that the B-52 may use some of the workstation gizmos found in the EA-18G "Growler", don't confuse the two. Because of power output , the Growler can only be an escort jammer. And well it will have some other challenges to get over too.

    Without good stand-off jamming ability, the USAF is going to have some trouble vs. a first team player in the coming years.



  • The Super Hornet Story

    Two Super Hornets in a break I will be doing a series of posts that tell the real story of the Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet. It is a story of an aircraft that is “good enough” if one uses the standard of Clint Eastwood as Dirty Harry in the movie Magnum Force. That is: “Man's got to know his limitations”.  The Super Hornet story is one of politcial slight of hand. It is a story of industry and the U.S. Navy trying to pull a fast one with the U.S. Congress. This is the story of desperation after the failure of the A-12. The story of the Super Hornet is one of an aircraft that is not an air domination machine, and given the threats in the coming years could find itself in a lot of trouble if forced to act as such. This is also a story of an aircraft that for most coalition joint operations, is a much better investment than the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). The F-35 story will be told at another time. However when you take all of the U.S. Navy needs into account, the Super Hornet beats anything that the JSF will ever be, both in cost and practical U.S. Navy aircraft carrier use. I hope you enjoy this story and find it entertaining and informative. With the U.S. government in ever increasing debt, a U.S. Navy that is having trouble with it's failed ship building program and a big question mark surrounding the F-35 capability that is yet to materialize, the Super Hornet is the most imporatant topic and center of gravity in relation to the future composition of the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier flight deck.

    While it may change over time,  These will be the topics covered in the Super Hornet story.

    • Introduction
    • The Early Years
    • Development
    • Introduction Into the Fleet
    • Performance Block I
    • Ten Years On
    • Foreign Sales
    • Performance Block II
    • The Future

    (U.S. Navy Photo)
  • Welcome

    South Korean F-15K Strike Eagle fighter aircraftThis is a new blog project I am starting. I hope you enjoy it.

    Posted Sep 20 2008, 01:35 PM by ELP with no comments
    Filed under:
© RBI 2001-2007