Cookies & Privacy New 110-165 seater design study, 20% fuel reduction over current Narrowbodies - Aerospace Technology - Aerospace Technology - Aviation Forums - Flightglobal Airspace

New 110-165 seater design study, 20% fuel reduction over current Narrowbodies

Bookmark and Share Skip to the end

rated by 0 users
This post has 0 Replies | 1 Follower

Top 500 Contributor
Ground Crew
stick_shaker Posted: Mon, Aug 6 2007 4:49 PM

There seems to be a trend towards bigger regional aircraft. This becomes visible in the various models under development by Embraer, Bombardier, Sukhoi, AVIC and Mitsubishi.  

Some basic specifications
- Max cruising speed: Mach.7
- Max range with full passenger load: 2200 nm
- Operating Empty Weight: 22,000kg ( 50.000lb)
- 70% Advanced materials CRFP / Alu-Li
- Capasity: 110-165 seats in single class 32 inch pitch

110-165 seat design study

Bigger : http://www.kaktusdigital.com/images/large/LRJ_02.jpg

Engine Technology
New engine technology includes a 1:12 BPR, a
International (GTF / KGTF), USA - Montana">GTF optimized for Mach 0.7 cruise and light carbon fanblades / engine cowling. Other engine technology includes noise absorbing materials, scarfed inlets and noise reducing exhaust pipes.

2200nm ranges from DFW, FRA and HKG. 

2200 nm full passenger load ranges from DFW, FRA & HKG

Cabin Comfort
The wide cabin is dimensioned for a comfortable 2-3 + 2-2 lay-out with every seat having two individual armrest. On top of this the aisle is 30inch wide, allowing passengers to pass each other / cabin staff with trolleys. A first are the small roof top windows that spreads a friendly natural light in the cabin, giving every passenger a perception of space. Large windows and luggage bins further enhance passenger comfort.

Spacy 2-3, 2-2 cabin 

A roomy 2-3 abreast cabin might be more efficient for aircraft <150 seats..

Stability and Control
Original designs included digital flight controls programmed to fly without a vertical stabilizer (B2, F117 etc) reducing weight and height. Later on it was decided to ad 2 vertical stabilizers for passive lateral stability and noise deflection. Differential thrust provides any missing directional stability.

Wouldn't such a 150 seater be more efficient then a heavy shrunken 6 abreast seater for low cost carriers ? They are not interested in larger variants / commonality? 

 
Page 1 of 1 (1 items) | RSS