Cookies & Privacy NTSB: Gulfstream Safety Culture A Factor In G650 Test Crash - Aircraft Incident log - Civil Aircraft - Aviation Forums - Flightglobal Airspace

NTSB: Gulfstream Safety Culture A Factor In G650 Test Crash

Bookmark and Share Skip to the end

rated by 0 users
This post has 1 Reply | 1 Follower

Top 10 Contributor
Male
Captain
flyvertosset Posted: Sat, Oct 13 2012 8:14 AM

The fiery crash of a Gulfstream G650 during flight testing in April 2011 was caused by an aerodynamic stall and subsequent uncommanded roll during a one-engine-out takeoff flight test, the NTSB determined on Wednesday. Those events were the result of several human failures, according to the NTSB: Gulfstream's failure to properly develop and validate takeoff speeds for the flight tests and recognize and correct a takeoff safety speed (V2) error during previous G650 flight tests.

The G650 flight-test team's persistent and increasingly aggressive attempts to achieve V2 speeds that were erroneously low; and Gulfstream's inadequate investigation of previous G650 uncommanded roll events, which would have shown that the company's estimated stall angle of attack while the airplane was in ground effect was too high. Two pilots and two engineers died in the crash, in Roswell, N.M. The G650 was type-certified last month.

"Two prior close calls should have prompted a yellow flag, but instead of slowing down to analyze what had happened, the program continued full speed ahead," said NTSB chairman Deborah Hersman. "This crash was as much an absence of leadership as it was of lift." Later, she acknowledged that after the accident, Gulfstream recognized "that many changes needed to be made and began to implement them."

The investigation showed that Gulfstream's flight-test schedule was "aggressive," with "pressure to get the aircraft certified," Hersman said. "Assumptions and errors were made, but they were neither reviewed nor evaluated when review data was collected."  

 

 Source: AVweb,  Mary Grady

Gravity always wins!

Not Ranked
Ground Crew
airmando replied on Sat, Oct 13 2012 3:54 PM

Very, very sad. I'm very sorry for the pilots and engineers who perished in the crash. My heart goes out to the families.

It's terrible the way there is often so much pressure on cramming schedules and "certification" in general (unfortunately I have some familiarity with this sort of scheduling even in the air ambulance world. You would think safety of the patient and aviation / medical crew would be the absolute first concern of companies that specialize in medical transports of all things).

But it seems to penetrate all fields of aviation today to some degree, or at least it seems like I hear about this sort of thing way too much (and one instance is enough). In this one instance, if the flight test team had investigated those previous "yellow flags" the incident might not have cost four lives, and that possibility alone is priceless. I wish incidents like these were more of a wake-up call to other programs / flight teams that choose reckless scheduling over air safety and quality.

Aviation is proof that given the will we have the capacity to achieve the impossible - E.R.
AirMedical.Net - Blog and community for Air Ambulance Crews

 
Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS