Cookies & Privacy Re Engining. - Aerospace Technology - Aerospace Technology - Aviation Forums - Flightglobal Airspace

Re Engining.

Bookmark and Share Skip to the end

rated by 0 users
This post has 14 Replies | 5 Followers

Not Ranked
Ground Crew
aviatorchris Posted: Sun, Mar 8 2009 6:27 PM

Hi all. Can anyone advise me if it is possible to re-engine the BAe Vickers VC 10 and Super VC 10 with V2500 units in place of the old Conways, and how much more efficient and ecologically acceptable would this be?

I have tried contacting Rolls Royce who frankly were no help at all.

Thanks, best regards, Aviatorchris

Top 50 Contributor
Male
Captain
rapier replied on Sun, Mar 8 2009 10:47 PM

I don't know if such an operation is feasible or desirable .....

The only thing I know is that these are old aircraft nearing withdrawal ..... Sad

"The VC10 and Lockheed Tristar tanker/transports are due to be replaced in RAF service by the Airbus A330 MRTT under the Future Strategic Tanker Aircraft Project." (source: Wikipedia)

A330 MRTT (RAAF)

 

 

Top 75 Contributor
Male
Engineer
Seat1A replied on Tue, Mar 10 2009 11:40 AM
Well Rolls Royce did have one of the RAF's standard VC10s flying around with an RB211 in place of two Conways for a few years . I ask why would you want to do this ? . It does not stop at new engines , many of the aircrafts other systems are long past their sell by dates. They are  full of  very early 1960s technology . I suspect it's a real struggle and very expensive for the RAF to keep these aircraft flying . The RAF  have scrapped a number for spares to keep the remaining aircraft flying. These airframes are probably pretty close to the end of their airframe lives .  Whilst they are still a wonderful sight (and sound), I'm afraid their days are numbered . Just remember the fiasco that is Nimrod MRA4 before embarking down this 'what if' path- It's practically a new aircraft .
Not Ranked
Ground Crew
aviatorchris replied on Wed, Mar 11 2009 11:18 AM

Hi. Thanks for your reply to my earlier post. Yes I remember the RB 211 experiment which wasn't a roaring success as it bent the engine support to the airframe!!

I still don't have the real answer i.e replacing the Conways with V2500's. Is it possible?

The reason I asked is because I love the plane, having flown on many to the Middle East during the late 60's and early 70's and I would hate that they just die in the fashion of Concorde. Yet more great British design and build put to the sword, so although nostalgic, my question was that of attempting to upgrade from a green clean point of view. Yes, I realise the airframes are very old now, despite much of the metalwork being milled from the solid, but then you could say that of DC3's!!

Anyway, thanks again for your response.

 

Top 100 Contributor
Engineer
7K7 replied on Thu, Mar 12 2009 11:15 PM

 The VC10 was the the RB211 flying test bed.

As for re-engining , 2xRB211 + VC10 = Boeing 757 Cool. Incidentally both exceptionally elegant machines.

That A330MRTT? Worthy successor Yes.

Not Ranked
Ground Crew

So would you say in an ideal world the super VC10 could be thus re-engined or alternatively 4 x V2500?

Any lottery win of mine would buy a super vc10 from the RAF!!!

Top 50 Contributor
Male
Captain
rapier replied on Fri, Mar 13 2009 3:58 PM

..... Any lottery win of mine would buy a super vc10 from the RAF!!! .....

And ..... why not an Ilyushin Il-62 ? ..... Big Smile

Not Ranked
Ground Crew

You jest, of course!!!!

Top 100 Contributor
Engineer
7K7 replied on Tue, Mar 17 2009 10:10 PM

 VC10 looks way cooler than the '62, is faster and gets off in smarter fashionCool.

Not Ranked
Ground Crew
jamanatu replied on Fri, Mar 20 2009 8:21 PM

 

Top 500 Contributor
Male
Ground Crew
ATT replied on Mon, Aug 31 2009 2:55 PM

KNEW A GUY THAT PUT A PORCHE ENGINE IN HIS VW BEETLE................ Wink

Top 100 Contributor
Engineer
7K7 replied on Wed, Sep 2 2009 12:32 PM

 Now there's an image - Porsche powerd VC10?

Not Ranked
Ground Crew
KurtVerbose replied on Thu, Sep 3 2009 10:42 AM

aviatorchris:
I still don't have the real answer i.e replacing the Conways with V2500's. Is it possible?
 

I guess anything is possible with the right money, but investing so much in such old aircraft, especially as there aren't that many of them and there's a glut of airliners at the moment would seem to indicate no!

As an engineering job the biggest problem would be the extra weight - modern high bypass engines are quite a lot heavier than those conways. You might have to fill the nose up with concrete or only hire really heavy pilots.

Top 100 Contributor
Engineer
7K7 replied on Fri, Sep 4 2009 11:02 PM

 That extra weight cantilevered behind the main gears could lead to interesting effects in the event of a heavy landing Smile

Perhaps a pair of RB535s (as in a 757) would be lighter?

Airline economics aside, it would be a cool personal jet if you had the pockets of an Abramovich or Arabian royalty Cool

Quick too if it could retain its 0.86 Mach cruise speed.

Not Ranked
Ground Crew
ricky2020 replied on Sat, Sep 5 2009 7:05 AM

 I don't think it's the right thing to do.For example, you replace your engine then

your engine's torque change and so the control surfaces also will have this

experience.Likewise,most of your systems will have to change and then there comes

the real problem:how can you get the airworthiness certification? Crying

With regards

 
Page 1 of 1 (15 items) | RSS