Tests at the US Sandia National Laboratories could lead to a more efficient interpretation of the 1960s concept of powering an interplanetary spacecraft using nuclear explosions. Project Orion, cancelled in 1965, envisaged powering a spacecraft by ejecting and exploding small nuclear bombs behind it.
The scaled-down Mini-Mag Orion propulsion concept being pursued by Andrews Space & Technology (AS&T) replaces the bombs with small pellets of fissile material that would be compressed beyond their supercritical point using a magnetic field. Another magnetic field would act as the nozzle, directing the resulting plasma away from the vehicle to generate thrust.
The tests, conducted under a NASA small business research contract, involved the magnetic compression technology fundamental to the Mini-Mag concept. The two tests used the world's largest operational pulse power machine to demonstrate compressing a simulated fissile material in a magnetic field.
The goal was to correlate the compression achieved with the current required. "A ratio of 10:1 would be useful, 30 would be great and 40 would be outstanding," says Ralph Ewig, AS&T principal investigator. Due to a diagnostic failure, experimenters were unable to quantify the degree of compression achieved, but it "fits the models", says Ewig. "It was not 100% proof, but it has not disproved the concept."
Seattle-based AS&T is now seeking extra funding to pursue development of a 250,000-500,000lb-thrust (1,000-2,000kN) engine using the Mini-Mag Orion concept. Such an engine would have a specific impulse - a measure of propulsive efficiency - of 10,000-30,000s, says Ewig, compared to under 500s for a conventional rocket motor. "The technology is working today. We could develop this engine in no more than 10 years," he says.
For exclusive news and expert analysis every week subscribe to Flight International print edition. Included with your subscription are 4 FREE issues and FREE delivery to your home or office.