Archives

Subscribe by E-mail

Right tax or wrong tax?

Some people may argue that there is no such thing as a 'right tax', but I think that in our society they are a legitimate way of funding government. However, the plan by the European Finance Ministers to create an airline tax to fund development aid (they are meeting today) is of course plain lunacy. Obviously every self respecting airline association (from the charter one, IACA, via the Association of European Airlines AEA to IATA) is fulminating against the proposals - and they would, 'cause that's their job. And sometimes they miss the mood of the moment a little bit by protesting too sharply against everything that will cost them more, but in this case they are right. Targetting taxes at one segment of commerce doesn't make sense. Aviation doesn't merit a special position because it is aviation (as it has been acting like for a long time) but taxing air travel is the same as slapping a tax on nappies, chocolate or CDs to fund development aid. If we as a nation or continent want to increase development aid - and I personally think we should - our politicians should not be afraid to raise general taxes to pay for this.


Having said that, I also think the industry should be more real about fuel tax - because that is going to come, and makes much more sense. Again aviation thinks it should get special treatment, and not pay tax on fuel - well if I fill up my car I pay fuel taxes, so aircraft that pollute the skies by burning fuel should do the same. Perhaps a simplistic analogy - but fuel use is and should be taxed for everyone.


Government regulation is still very pervasive in the airline industry - it will be a long time (and many blogs) before that has been brought to levels that other industries enjoy - and it may get worse before it gets better.

Technorati tag:

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Right tax or wrong tax?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3706

1 Comment

Neil Gascoigne

Think how car fuel is taxed within countries whose span is say at most 500 miles. This could be the UK or perhaps even the Netherlands ;)

Now consider large continental countries like Australia or the USA. Why is their car fuel taxed less?

Taxes through ability to pay and make a profit can inhibit movement and trade respectively.

Perhaps then not a good idea to overdo any fuel duty/VAT ideas for flights. If there were a means imposed so that operators insisted engine companies provided more efficient engines, then I think both business and environmentalist can be happy.

Now if they would only do away with leaded AVGAS!

Neil Gascoigne

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!

Cookies & Privacy

Like on Facebook

October 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Finance Pro

Go Pro with Finance Pro

An up-to-the-minute web service for air finance professionals providing news, analysis and aircraft value data direct to your desktop.

Why not go pro to find out about:

  • Latest deal announcements
  • Global financial developments including orders, start-ups and distressed carriers
  • Pricing data of the most recent deals
  • Instant alerts

Find out more

 

Recent Assets

  • Alex Cruz Vueling CEO.JPG
  • Republic_Airlines_merger_roots
  • Republic_Story_Cover.jpg
  • UA_787_routes_Mar13.jpeg
  • IMAG0142.jpg
  • WN_AT_route_map.jpeg
  • DFW_Top10_DOT
  • DFW Top 10 markets
  • JetBlue_cake.jpg
  • S17_1353.jpg