Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Recent Assets

  • Evector Erie Colo crash.JPG
  • PiperJet FLA air museum 4.JPG
  • PiperJet FLA air museum 3.JPG
  • PiperJet FLA air museum 2.JPG
  • PiperJet FLA air museum 1.JPG
  • Top Gear Helo Crash.JPG
  • UAV docking.JPG
  • Operation Auca.JPG
  • Plane Food 737.JPG
  • panacea photo ercoupe manual 2.JPG

June 2010 Archives

NASA tests life-saving algorithms in unique "flying windtunnel"

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

In the emergency medical services field, experts speak of the "golden hour", the time within which a seriously wounded patient has a better chance of survival if rushed to an emergency room.

In a transport aircraft that has been upset, there is an equivalent concept when it comes to the potential for recovering control and saving many lives, except that the "hour" is actually "seconds". Researchers at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and University of Connecticut have developed an adaptive flight-control algorithm, dubbed L1, that could do just that - give the pilot of an otherwise uncontrollable aircraft just a few extra seconds of controllability, enough to give him or her time to save the vehicle from a loss-of-control accident.

AirSTAR_blog_1.jpg

NASA Langley in early June flew the L1 adaptive controller as part of the agency's Airstar (airborne subscale transport aircraft research) testbed in rural Virginia, putting the algorithm to the test during post-stall high angle-of-attack and other scenarios. Adaptive controls take advantage of every available control surface to follow the pilot's commands despite the state of the aircraft. Photo credit: NASA

 

Langley senior researcher Irene Gregory explains that historically, adaptive control algorithms could guarantee stability in steady-state operations only, not during transients.

A new version of adaptive control called "L1", however, can predict transient behaviour. "That's a really big deal," says Gregory, "to know what will happen in the first seconds after a transient."

airstar_command_centre.jpgNASA worked with researchers to test the new algorithm on its subscale model to help research pilots maintain control of the aircraft when it departs the nominal operating envelope, a realm the device is intended to probe often. It is not too far of a leap to imagine such algorithms being used on commercial transport aircraft for the same purpose. Photo credit: NASA.

 

 

Below is a video showing the basic features of the AirSTAR testbed, courtesy of NASA.

 

During testing of the T2 subscale generic transport model from 2-4 June at Fort Pickett airfield in Virginia, the algorithm proved its worth. Gregory says one of the test cards called for the research pilot put the aircraft at a post-stall angle-of-attack without and then with the L1 controller. She explains that the research pilot's job was to put in step input of positive elevator at the post-stall AoA and attempt to hold the aircraft there. Without L1, "he couldn't hold the aircraft", she says. "It was rolling and slicing, exceeding 45° bank."

The NASA video below shows a stall manueuver for which pilots did not use one of several adaptive controllers being tested at Fort Pickett, including L1.

 

Using the L1 control law in the same manoeuvre however, she says the pilot was able to hold the nose-high attitude for 3-4s and bank angles never exceeding 20°. "It bought him time to make a proper recovery," she says.

The NASA video below shows a similar maneuver in which the L1 controller made a normally uncontrollable roll divergence controllable and made post-stall behavior very controllable. 

Thanks to NASA Langley PR guru Kathy Barnstorff and all the researchers at NASA for letting me see this amazing research "facility" in action.

Monkey on NASA's Back, Part Deux

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

monkey.JPGBack in January, I blogged about NASA's somewhat controversial plans to expose squirrel monkeys to gargantuan amounts of radiation to simulate what might happen to astronauts on long space journeys.

...PETA is protesting in front of various NASA sites about a study in which the space agency will expose 18 squirrel monkeys to the amount of space radiation in one big dose that astronauts would receive on an entire multi-month mission. In other words, a reallly high dose.

Turns out the monkey's still on NASA's back.

Business Wire yesterday ran an article by Animal Defenders International saying that long-time NASA-employed International Space Station engineer, April Evans, has resigned her good-paying, excellent-benefits government job in protest. Her argument, in part, is that such research is no longer needed, the larger issue being figuring out how to shield space travelers from the radiation in the first place.

 

GRUMPY OLD MEN: United pilot at SFO

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

flight track _ grump UAL 56.JPG

Thanks to Silagi from LiveATC.net for posting the audio of a very grumpy United Airlines A320 pilot departing the San Francisco International airport (KSFO) to Newark (KEWR) at 10:44 pm (pacific time) on 23 June (flight info from FlightAware.com).

Take a listen Grumpy Old Men - UAL 56.mp3

Is it just me, or does this dude need to take a chill pill?

NASA's easy peezey BWB squeezy

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

NASA is set to mass produce the airliner of the future.

X-48C.jpgIn a recent FedBizOps announcement, the agency's Dryden flight research centre is asking for vendors who can build 25,000 copies of its Blended Wing Body (BWB) design, pictured at left in the form of the X-48C subscale mode.

There are some caveats however.

The mass-produced "vehicles" must be white in colour, and must have the NASA meatball insignia and website stamped on the top.

Oh, and they also must be.... squeezy.

Yep, what NASA wants are 4.75in - 5.5in-width cuddly squeezable models, which it affectionately calls, "BWB squeezies".

Can I have one?  

 

 

 

 

Propjet Party: Introduction to the Pilatus PC-12NG

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

I recently had the chance to get some flight time in a 2010 Pilatus PC-12NG with one of the best instructors I could hope to find - Pilatus Business Aircraft chief pilot Peter Duncan.

Duncan, based near Denver, was on the east coast on 20 May 2010 showing off the latest Honeywell APEX integrated avionics system installed on the aircraft, and revealed new features slated for the next update. Click here for my Flight International story on the next upgrade.

Here's a YouTube tour of the aircraft on the ground an in the air. Enjoy.

Flipped Stearman at DCA: Take a chill pill

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

stearman_flip.JPGWhile it's important to get to the bottom of most if not all aircraft accidents, the prang by a Stearman A75 (N27WE) at Reagan National airport yesterday maybe shouldn't have drawn as much attention as it did, all things being considered.

NTSB was quick to dispatch its "A team" to the incident, given that the media (including my excellent colleagues at Flight) was not only watching, but was involved in the event. Thank goodness no one was hurt.

Let's get real though. 

A quick look at NTSB records (searching on "Stearman" in the Word String field) shows that Stearman's nose-over, and nose-over, and nose-over. Of the accidents the board has investigated since 2005, there have been six Stearman nose-overs by my count, and that's not including a nose-over in Salina, Kansas on Sunday, according to FAA preliminary incident reports.

Let's investigate these lightweight prangs, especially when important sounding Washington Post journos like Ashley Halsey III are on board, but let's keep the A-team reserved for safety problems that might affect a bit larger portion of the population, yeah?

SpaceX Falcon 9: Close Encounters of the down-under kind

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Aussie resdents from Victoria to Queensland got a big suprise early Saturday morning if they happened to be out just before dawn and were looking skyward. What first might have appeared to be a UFO was later more accurately defined as the orbital portions of SpaceX's Falcon 9 launch vehicle, launched about an hour earlier from Florida on its maiden mission.

 

Other than saying the mission was successful in that the rocket delivered its mock payload into a 250km circular orbit, SpaceX hasn't provided details as to the condition of the rocket or payload once it got to that orbit, or whether the spin rate, shown in the YouTube video below after roughly 7 minutes of flight, was planned, and if it was not planned, what happened?

EADS to wow ILA with diesel-electric hybrid helo

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

hybrid helo.JPGWord from Germany is that EADS Innovation Works, the corporate research and technology arm of EADS, will unveil at the ILA show in Berlin next week a full-scale mockup of a helicopter powered by an innovative two-stroke diesel engine as part of hybrid electric propulsion system for the vehicle.

The company says such a design could cut fuel burn and emissions by 50% while cutting noise with electric-only takeoffs and landings. A brochure from EADS is below.

SpaceX Musk's odd take on the odds of Falcon 9 success

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

deer_hunter.JPGWhat does the gentleman on the left in the famous clip from the movie, The Deer Hunter, have going for him that SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket does not?

A better chance of success, says SpaceX CEO and entrepreneur, Elon Musk

 

During a Launch minus 1 day teleconference with reporters today, Musk had this to say when asked how likely it would be that the maiden flight from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station Friday would go well...

"We probably have a 70% - 80% probability of success, less than that of Russian Roulette. Remember that scene from the Deer Hunter? But not as likely the probability of success."

Musk, despite his penchant for being completely and utterly random, a trait I appreciate immensely, knows his math: For a six-shooter with one bullet in chamber, the probability of success, assuming you want to live, is 83%. The guy on the left, if you recall, was first, and beat the odds. The other guy? Not so much.

Korean Air Boeing 777 flunked landing: Good thing it didn't have a prop

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

There's an old wives tale in the general aviation that's actually not a wives tale at all: If you get into an oscillation on landing and don't get out of it, the propeller will strike the ground on the "down" portion of the third up-and-down cycle. I've seen it happen on several occasions.

Here's the setup: Pilot lands hard; the aircraft bounces back up into the air, a combination of landing gear spring forces and ground effect producing more lift. The pilot then pushes the control column forward to get back down to the runway. Unfortunately, that's the exact WRONG input, as the energy then increases again and continues the oscillation.

The right input, at least for a single-engine piston driven aircraft, is to either do a go-around after that first or second oscillation, or, if there's enough runway, hold the control column aft (up elevator) and let the energy bleed off before the aircraft settles again. Once on the ground, keep the control wheel back and take out the flaps.

What should this Korean Air pilot have done? Looks to me like the control column was cycling fore and aft, promoting a pilot-induced oscillation and there doesn't appear to be a go-around attempt. Thanks to FlightAware.com for heads-up on this video. I'm just saying... NOTE: The original video has been pulled from YouTube, but you can see the clip here...