Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Recent Assets

  • Chiron_blog.jpg
  • Tail rotor take off gear on right as compared to a new pinion on the left.jpg
  • MGB_oilfilter_studs_missing.jpg
  • Wreckage layout and reconstruction.jpg
  • POCFlightImg201Featured.jpg

John Croft: June 2009 Archives

Chiron: No jacket required

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Aurora Flight Sciences this week revealed that it has been flying an "optionally manned" general aviation aircraft that can do autonomous takeoff and landings for the past three months just outside of Washington DC. Pictured below is Aurora's Cessna 337 "Chiron" testbed.

Chiron_blog.jpg

Though the object of project was to prove out the ability to deliver fully autonomous takeoffs and landings for Aurora's unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) programs, particularly the Orion, it's clear that the same low-cost technology could do wonders for the safety of light aircraft with humans on board.

In fact, humans were on board the highly modified 1967 Cessna 337 Skymaster (or "Huff 'n' Puff" if you like), but only to take control if the technology failed, which it did not.

"Most current UAVs, such as Predator, have a pilot "in the loop" for takeoff and landing," says Aurora. "Department of Defence studies have identified this approach as a major source of UAV accidents and losses."

If the price is right, seems like a good solution for manned aviation as well.... 

Feds, Sikorsky: Too little too late on Cougar S-92 crash

|
Wreckage layout and reconstruction.jpgSafety Investigators in Canada have determined that pilots of a Cougar Helicopters Sikorksy S-92 that crashed in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Newfoundland on 12 March, resulting in the deaths of 17 of the 18 on board, were likely trying to autorotate the heavy twin helicopter after a tail rotor drive failure, precipitated (my words, not theirs) by a loss of main gear box (MGB)`lubrication fluid. After the helicopter hit the water, the floatation system, for reasons unknown, failed to inflate. Pictured above is the reconstruction of the crash helicopter by the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB).

Though the details of how successful that autorotation maneouver turned out to be are yet to be determined -- initial data shows the helicopter hit the water with a force of 20Gs -- what is clear is that the problem that initiated the deadly chain of events in the first place might have been flagged up before the helicopter was certified by the US Federal Aviation Administration.

Though the analysis is not yet complete, the evidence strongly suggests that two cracked titanium mounting studs used to hold an external oil filter for the helicopter's main gear box (MGB) cracked and allowed the transmission oil to quickly drain out. Picture below, from TSB, shows a one of the missing oil filter studs on the right side... 

MGB_oilfilter_studs_missing.jpg

An emergency airworthiness directive after the fact required the replacement of those studs with steel equivalents throughout the fleet. Sikorsky earlier had given operators a year to do the changeout, a suggestion spawned by similar but non-lethal failures in the fleet.

Once that oil drained, the rotating machinery had no cooling. In picture below, also from TSB, damage to the tail rotor pick-off gear (connected to the MGB to power the tail rotor) is obvious when compared to a new pinion on the left...

Tail rotor take off gear on right as compared to a new pinion on the left.jpg

In the aftermath of the crash, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) says the FAA and Sikorsky "are working to identify all the modes of failure that might lead to Sikorsky S-92A MGB oil loss, determining their probability of occurrence, and developing appropriate mitigation strategies."

Huh? Shouldn't such a failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) be done BEFORE certification?

Apparently not...

Though under Part 29 certification rules for rotorcraft, failures that result in the loss of lubrication to the drive train, in this case the MGB (the mechanism that takes in power from the S-92's two turboshaft engines to drive the main rotor, tail rotor, power systems, etc), must allow for 30 minutes of flight time after the crew receives an indication of the problem in the cockpit, there's an escape clause of sorts in the regs... If a failure mode is determined to be "extremely remote", the 30 minute rule no longer applies...

It's not clear in the case of the Cougar crash whether pilots, through tribal knowledge, assumed there was 30 minutes to get back to shore despite emergency guidance material for such anomalies. The helicopter ultimately went into the water about 10 minutes after losing its lubrication oil.

And why didn't the "30 minute rule" apply?

"Based on the applicable guidance material at the time of certification, the lubrication failure modes of interest were limited to the failure of external lines, fittings, valves, and coolers," writes the TSB in an 18 June update on the accident.

"This practice was consistent with industry experience, which had found that loss of lubrication tended to be associated with external devices. Therefore, the possibility of a failure at the oil filter was considered to be extremely remote. As a result of the fracture of the filter bowl mounting studs, resulting in the loss of a large quantity of oil, the certification guidance material is being reviewed." 

   

 

 

 

Dark Dog Blues

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Do dog-lovers make poor pilots?

Check out this LiveLeak video of an An Express Air Dornier Do-328-100 (PK-TXN) that flubbed its landing in Indonesia yesterday just after a dog scooted across the runway.

From what I know about dogs, the tail-high posture of this canine indicates he's a prankster...

  POCFlightImg201Featured.jpg

Terrafugia reports that it successfully completed the first of four phases in its bid to produce a "roadable" sport light aircraft, the Transition. The company's proof-of-concept aircraft completed 28 flights over several weeks starting with first flight on 5 March, with test pilots probing the handling, performance, take off and landing, stability and stall performance of the unique pusher aircraft that can be driven home from airport and stowed in a normal garage.  

The company says a Beta prototype is now being built, incorporating modifications learned in the first phase of the program. First delivery is set for 2011.

The video below is from one of the test flights...

 

ASDE-X saves the day in Charlotte

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

The FAA doesn't usually like to talk about the "saves" that take place when safety alerting systems in the tower sound off and save the day. The NTSB however does. In a press release issued Tuesday, the safety board reveals that it is investigating the case of a PSA Airlines CRJ-200 that narrowly avoided hitting a single-engine Pilatus PC-12 as both were taking off at the Charlotte Douglas International Airport in North Carolina on the morning of 29 May.

I've compiled the video below with some of the details, plus the audio of a frazzled controller who calls off the CRJ's takeoff after the ASDE-X airport surveillance system issues its automated alert. ASDE-X, built by Sensis Corp, fuses a variety of surveillance data on aircraft and vehicles on and around airports to computer potential conflicts. The system was installed at Charlotte in 2007, and is being rolled out at the 35 largest airports in the US.

While it's unclear whether the pilots themselves would have been able to see and avoid each other since the weather was good, the NTSB points out that the FAA said the two aircraft stopped only 10ft from each other when it was all said and done. The investigation continues...