UAE loss requires serious re-thinking by T-50 marketing team


The Korea Aerospace Industries T-50 programme has suffered a serious blow after the United Arab Emirates selected the Alenia Aermacchi M346 for its advanced lead-in fighter trainer requirement.

If the South Korean company and Lockheed Martin, which helped to develop the aircraft and works with KAI to market it internationally, want to develop an export market for the T-50 (left), they need to assess what went wrong in the UAE and do it quickly.

The next major competition is in Singapore, where the T-50 is up against the M-346 (below) once again. The aircraft is also in contention in Poland against the BAE Systems Hawk 51 modified by Finland’s Patria. Chile, Greece and the USA are other markets further down the line.


Abu Dhabi has not said why it went for the M-346 but does not take a lot to figure out that a combination of cost and capabilities ultimately decided the competition. The UAE is a savvy customer, as is Singapore. They know what they want, and it is up to the manufacturers to convince them that they have the best product.

Marketing plays a big part in any competition as well. At the end of the day, countries likes the UAE and Singapore only want an aircraft that ensures their pilots are properly trained to fly their new generation fighters.

The Italians have kept the attention on the M-346′s training capabilities at every opportunity, and used this to say why they are the best option for the countries that are assessing the aircraft. KAI and Lockheed have raved about the T-50′s ability to go supersonic and have attack variants, but that adds to the perception that it is simply a souped up toy that simply costs too much for an advanced trainer requirement. The T-50 marketing team needs to go back to the basics.

Winning in the UAE has given the M-346 an edge in upcoming coming competitions, but this can be a good wake up call for KAI and Lockheed if they learn the right lessons from their loss.

, ,

3 Responses to UAE loss requires serious re-thinking by T-50 marketing team

  1. Aninformedindustrysource 26 February, 2009 at 11:15 pm #

    Take it from me my friend, the T-50 was offered for about half the price of the M-346. Money had nothing to do with it!

  2. BUBBA 27 February, 2009 at 5:01 am #

    Lockheed could care less about T-50 and KAI never had a chance with so many localisation requirements binding in their cost. Bottom line is Lockheed owes KAI and investor, the ROK govtm by seriously promoting T-50 to USAF. That is the only redemption.

  3. Royce 3 March, 2009 at 11:37 am #

    The stories I read indicated that better workshare won the day. Plus, if the T-50 wins the T-38 replacement contract, will it really matter what happens anywhere else?

Leave a Reply