Archives

Subscribe by E-mail

August 2011 Archives

J-2X - yet another regional fighter?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

I came across a blog entry claiming that Pakistan and China plan to co-develop a 'fourth generation stealth fighter' called the J-2X. The images below first appeared on the Asian Defence News blog site.

J-2X Fighter Jet.jpg
The aircraft looks like a hodgepodge of existing types - none of them stealthy. The J-2X's clipped delta wing is reminiscent of the F-16 and JF-17, the intakes scream F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet, and the tail plane, again, is very F-16.

Is this for real? Possibly. Chengdu and the Pakistan Aeronautical Complex worked closely on the JF-17 programme, with this aircraft steadily entering service in the Pakistan Air Force. Based on these rudimentary images the J-2X would not appear to offer much over the Chengdu J-10B, of which Pakistan reportedly signed for 36 in 2009, though this deal has yet to be officially confirmed. CATIC reps just smile and shake their head when I ask them about it.

Then again, with the JF-17 put to bed Pakistan will presumably want to keep its aerospace engineers busy. Military aircraft have far more to do with politics and jobs than with defence requirements and common sense.

Perhaps the J-2X will join other regional fighter programmes, such as India's medium combat aircraft (MCA), Tokyo's ATD-X, and the KF-X that will be developed by Seoul and Jakarta. 
J-2X Fighter Jet_1.jpg

Now open! The J-20's weapons bay doors

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
J-20.weapons.bay_.1-500x296.jpg

This week's batch of Chengdu J-20 photos apparently show the aircraft with its weapons bay doors open. 

Something has been bothering me about the J-20, and finally I realize what it is. The aircraft's landing gear and weapons bay doors all have long, straight edges.  I don't claim to be an expert on stealth technology, but aircraft covers with angled edges seem de rigueur on more recent western types, most notably the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. Note the shape of the panels and weapon bay doors in the picture of an F-22 model below. Square, sharp panel and door edges are kept to a minimum.

At Aero India, a Boeing test pilot told me that the F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet has angled edges for its panels because this helps to improve its low observable characteristics.  I've also been told numerous times that canards are a serious foopah on a stealthy aircraft. 


F-22 image for door story.jpg


Flightglobal tip: don't attack army helos with pickaxes

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'm stunned by the A$200,000 claim the Australian Army has made against Bryan Law, the peace protestor who used a garden pickaxe to smack a small hole into a Eurocopter Tiger attack helicopter last month during the Talisman Sabre exercise.  


According to a story in the North Shore & Coolum News, the claim covers several items.

1) Minor damage to the helicopter's fuselage - basically a small tear in a non-vital area.

2) The loss of the helicopter's use during the repair period. 

3) Transporting the aircraft by air (presumably in a Boeing C-17 Globemaster III) to a repair centre.

Anyone who has ever had to replace a panel on their European car will understand the first claim, but it's the second two that bewilder me. Was the damage so great that the helicopter had to be grounded? The Taliban will take heart if a few strokes of a pickaxe is all it takes to knock out an attack helicopter.

Since regular use of the aircraft probably runs into the thousands of dollars per flight hour, having it out of action probably saved taxpayers a small fortune. Of course, this benefit was probably offset by the decision to transport the helicopter by air (by air!) to a repair facility.

Law reportedly says he doesn't regret his action, and is willing to go to jail for a while.  As for the cost, it's probably a good thing Mr. Law didn't know enough about attack helicopters to realize that the real money is in the aircraft's sensors and weapons. Perhaps he needs to spend more time on Flightglobal's defence pages.  

Follow me on Twitter: @AsiaJetWatch

Taiwan's 66 F-16 C/Ds: the Ohio and Florida problem

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
2011-08-11_10-22-05_333.jpg

Wendell Minnick's Defense News story that a US delegation visited Taiwan to tell Taipei that the deal for 66 F-16 C/Ds is dead has created a stir in the region's defence circles. Officials from both the US and Taiwan rushed to deny the report. Nonetheless, virtually every pundit, journalist, official, and industry executive I've spoken to privately feels that Taiwan won't get new F-16 C/Ds. Washington's fear of angering China is simply to great.

Hilary Clinton is due to make her recommendation on the sale on 1 October, China's national day. Given that China's reserves supply a good portion of Washington's budget these days, her suggestion is all but a forgone conclusion: China is of infinite importance, so lets keep the peace, and suggest only that Taiwan's 152 F-16 A/Bs be upgraded. One source told me that Washington and Beijing are like "two scorpions in a bottle." They have a deep symbiotic relationship, but distrust is high on the security front.

In any case, the potential Taiwan sale comes at a time when, after over thirty years of production, the F-16 is nearing the end of its production run. On 3 August Flightglobal reported that Lockheed Martin will  begin to shut down or experience "significant gaps" on the line - unless the company secures new orders for the fighter by the end of 2011.

A 66-aircraft F-16 C/D order would be great news for the F-16 line. Manna from Heaven. Media reports suggest 16,000 F-16 related jobs are at stake, with a number of these in the key battleground states of Ohio and Florida. If Obama is steadfast about denying Taiwan F-16 C/Ds, it would be easy work for the Republicans to take a populist line during the 2012 electoral campaign. They could accuse the Democrats of favoring Chinese interests over American jobs. The could pin him for favoring a communist dictatorship over a vibrant democratic ally in an important region.

My prediction: Clinton will suggest the F-16 C/D sale not go through. Next year, however, the Republicans will make Taiwan's F-16s an election issue. American voters are unlikely to appreciate the nuances of America's financial problems, especially where jobs and national prestige are concerned. China has done itself no favors browbeating the US about its debt addiction. Ronald Reagan defeated Jimmy Carter with the slogan 'Make America Strong Again.' Taiwan could see some new airplanes yet.  

Taipei's A380 theme restaurant

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
2011-08-11_16-54-49_725.jpg

During my recent trip to Taipei I came across an interesting restaurant. The A380 Sky Kitchen is clearly the brain child of an avid commercial aviation fan. I hope the food is better than that served by the real airlines. 

2011-08-11_16-55-00_184.jpg

2011-08-11_16-55-12_910.jpg
2011-08-11_16-55-34_431.jpg
2011-08-11_16-55-46_500.jpg

TADTE attendance reflects China fear factor

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

2011-08-11_14-29-22_244.jpgTaiwan's requirement for 66 new F-16 C/Ds is no diminutive affair. Regional requirements for fewer aircraft such as Malaysia's new fighter (16-18 aircraft), Japan's FX-II (42), and Korea's FX-III (60) have attracted intense interest from the heavy hitters: Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Rafale, Eurofighter, Saab, and even the Russians.

In such competitions the biggies spend small fortunes on elaborate stands at local air shows. They wine and dine defence bigwigs in palatial chalets that would do most five star hotels credit. Selling fighters involves not only the companies, but their governments, who fight hard for jobs at home and national prestige.

One testament to China's growing power - and more particularly western countries' fear of offending Beijing - is the modest outlay western firms have made at the Taipei Aerospace & Defence Technology Exhibition (TADTE - pictured above). This despite a massive requirement here for new fighter aircraft and technology.

The only big western makers here are Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman. Lockheed has a big stand by TADTE standards (picture below), but it is a tiny affair compared with that firm's efforts at shows such as Aero India or Singapore. There is not a single F-16 model in sight. At Aero India, by contrast, Lockheed flew in two F-16 Block 60s, one for media flights and one for flight demos. It also had a huge stand an palatial chalet - all this a few months before the F-16, F/A-18 E/F, and MiG-35 were bumped from the MMRCA competition.

2011-08-11_10-13-09_631 (1).jpg

Raytheon and Northrop, who could have a chance to install their competing RACR and SABR AESA radar upgrades on Taiwan's 166 F-16 A/Bs, also have modest stands. Their presence here is not at all commensurate with the size of the potential contracts.

Boeing, no doubt mindful of its commercial aircraft business on the mainland, has not had a stand for two shows running. Air show stalwarts from Russia and Europe are also nowhere to be found.

The real value of the show, of course, is to showcase the surprisingly vibrant local aerospace industry. Taiwanese companies have come up with a number of innovative small UAVs. There are also major programmes like the indigenous defence fighter (IDF) (model pictured below), which would have been a more advanced system had Taiwan not received F-16 A/Bs in the early nineties. Taiwan also has big plans in the UAV and UCAV spaces.

Nonetheless, it is somewhat surreal to wander the halls of the show and reflect on the major opportunities western countries and firms are forgoing on behalf of China's sensitivities.

2011-08-11_10-14-00_217 (1).jpg 

TADTE: UCAVs and carrier killers

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Quite enjoying the world of Taiwan military aviation on show at the Taipei Aerospace & Defense Technology Exhibition (TADTE, which everyone pronounces as 'TATE').

The most striking thing by far is the belligerent videos and images the Taiwan Ministry of National Defense has on display.

A video in the stand of Chung-Shan Institute of  Science and Technology (above) has a Taiwanese F-16 destroying a Chinese warship and ground targets, while a UCAV similar to the X-45 or X-47 shoots down an Su-27. UCAVs also fire upon ground and sea targets. They told me this capability would be possible in ten years, but that it's not aimed at any particular country. It is remarkably similar to a mural displayed by China at last year's Zhuhai show.

The mural below shows a missile slamming into a ship that looks remarkably like China's first carrier, which happened to have its maiden cruise yesterday. I'm told that in Chinese the words read 'carrier killer.'

"Is that China's aircraft carrier?" I asked a nearby naval officer.

"No, it is meant more generally than that. We don't refer to one specific country."

Perhaps he was referring to Thailand's carrier or one of the Indian carriers. Scenarios in which either of those countries were to attack Taiwan are, I fear, beyond my imaginative capabilities. 

Though many western pundits have dismissed China's carrier ambitions, Taiwan fears such ships operating to the east of the Island. Most of the country's sea defences are oriented toward destroying shipping in the Taiwan Straits. Air strikes coming in from the east would greatly complicate the island's defence. 

Carrier killer.jpg


India's answer to the X-37B?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
India X-37B.jpg

India's IDRW blog posted an intriguing image (above) earlier this week of what appears to be India's answer to the Boeing X-37B (picture below).

The spacecraft pictured is just a model, but according to IDRW India plans a vehicle to test reusable unmanned spacecraft technologies. The Russian's are also working on a reusable unmanned system.

Though the X-37B programme is shrouded in secrecy, its possible applications boggle the mind.  Such spacecraft could be sent up quickly to replace satellites shot down early in a war, and theoretically take evasive action if attacked. They could also have a role in guiding UAVs and UCAVs over enemy territory, and even carry weapons into space, either for attacking targets on earth or for disrupting enemy satellites.  

Boeing X-37B.jpg


Photos: J-10A vs. J-10B recognition tips

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
J-10B with WS-10.jpg

Images have emerged this week of the Chengdu J-10B (above), with bloggers speculating that the aircraft is powered by the indigenous Shenyang  WS-10 engine, which is also used on the J-11 Su-27 copy. There is also some comment about the bulges before the canards. 

For the casual observer, there are a few quick ways to tell the difference between the J-10A (below) and J-10B. 

1) The J-10B has an infrared search and track (IRST) system on the right side in front of the cockpit.

2) The J-10B has a slightly larger vertical stablizer with a rounder edge.

3) The J-10B's engine exhaust duct is slightly shorter in relation to the tail.

4) The J-10A has struts between the engine intake and fuselage. The J-10B's engine intake is flush with the fuselage, for a smoother, cleaner look.

J-10A - cropped.jpgBlow are more pictures of the J-10B, and one with the J-10B alongside the J-20.

J-10B.jpg

J-10B overhead.jpg

J-10B with J-20.jpg