October 2011 Archives

On a recent holiday I read The Age of Airpower by Martin Van Creveld. If reading something so obviously work related on holiday marks me as a workaholic then so be it. Perhaps worse, I couldn't put it down.

The book is an A-Z of military campaigns in which airpower played a role. Best of all it discussed a number of obscure campaigns, such as the Italians' use of airpower in Libya before World War I, and the British policy of Air Control in the interwar period.

It also details the role of airpower in the major wars, and how different airpower doctrines evolved and were executed by major the five main WWII belligerents - the USA, the UK, Russia, Japan, and Germany.

Through all this Van Crevald manages to weave the apprehension the world's army's and navies have always felt toward airpower. Armies feel airpower is best employed in a close support role, whereas air forces - ever mindful of their independence - see a bigger role, with airpower best employed in interdiction, or in knocking out the enemy's command and control systems as the US demonstrated in the first Gulf War.

Despite the positive title The Age of Airpower will give defence contractors cause to reflect. It points out that no two powers capable of making advanced fighters have engaged in hostilities since WWII owing to the threat of nuclear weapons, which he feels obviate the role of combat aircraft.

He also questions the wisdom of spending billions on expensive aircraft such as the F-22, F-35, and Eurofighter. These modern aircraft simply cannot be mass produced and rapidly deployed like the Mustangs, Spitfires, Focke Wolfes, and Messerschmitts of WWII.  In a modern war of attrition, he suggests, belligerents would soon be forced to fall back on less advanced systems.

All in all a great, entertaining read about a deeply fascinating subject.  

Throw a rock into the air at this week's Seoul Air Show and it would likely have come down on the head of a top international defence executive. Several industry bigshots who gave Paris a miss in June spent days at Seoul, meeting with South Korea's defence acquisition mandarins and generals.

"This show was extremely well organized," said the PR chief from one major prime contractor. "Delegations arrived at our stand as scheduled, and there was intense interest in our technologies."

The international boss of an Ameican firm said foreign air shows such as Seuol and India offer better value for defence firms than traditional shows such as Farnborough and Paris.

"Farnborough is too expensive for us," he said. "In Asia, meanwhile, people are still spending money on defence. And they keep track of who makes the effort to visit the show. We'll definitely be back."

Though there was a great deal of high-level hobnobbing at Seoul, covering it was no cakewalk for journalists. Unlike more established shows the big defence players made few, if any, big announcements. They also held few briefings. It was up to journalists to hit the stands and chalets, getting news the old fashioned way. That said, as  regional shows such as Seoul and Aero India become more important, companies be expected to save a few big stories for coverage in the show dailies. 

By day four the defenc titans who attended Seoul have given way to families and enthusiasts. Nonetheless, Seoul 2011 has demonstrated the trend toward regional shows is very much alive.