Archives

Subscribe by E-mail

July 2012 Archives

Surprise! All of China's military kit was developed at home

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Z-10 is an Chinese attack helicopter.jpg
Chinese defence ministry spokesman Yang Yujun has defended the indigenous nature of the  AVIC Z-10 attack helicopter. This follows United Technologies' (UTC) admission in June that it knowingly supplied China with a Pratt & Whitney Canada engine for the type.

Basically, the Chinese are saying "we built it on our own," while UTC has paid a $75 million fine for supplying an engine in addition to hundreds of other arms export violations.

Here is what the Chinese have to say (full text here):

A Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Thursday refuted reports that China's military attack helicopter Z-10 pirated U.S. technologies, saying the helicopter's manufacturer had used independent intellectual property rights...

"China's attack helicopters and their engines are all self-developed, and have proprietary intellectual property rights," said Yang, adding that the so-called piracy "is far from truth."

What gives? I was going to write a formal story about this statement, it was even on the day's to-do list, but I just cannot bring myself to take these comments at face value. And then, halfway through the release, the spokesman drops this bomb:

Yang said the development of China's military equipment has always followed the principle of independent innovation, and relied on its own capability in research and production.

Wow.

Where do I start? Reverse engineering the Su-27 to create the J-11B? The use of Lavi blueprints in the development of the J-10? Guys busted trying to smuggle fighter components from Russia to China? And why does the Z-9 look exactly like the Dauphin?

Either Yang has a very, very dry sense of humour or he's been hitting the party-line Kool Aid very hard indeed. Perhaps UTC can use these comments to tender an appeal? 

VIDEO: MiG-29KUB touch and goes - but not on Vikradmaditya, sadly

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

One of the more glamourous aspects of covering defence aerospace for Flightglobal is chasing public relations guys at the region's defence ministries. Earlier this week I was chasing India's ministry of defence for confirmation of reports that a MiG-29KUB had conducted the first touch and goes from the deck of the INS Vikramaditya, which is undergoing sea trials in the icy seas off Northern Russia.

They have yet to get back to me, so I'll keep chasing them. I decided to check Youtube in the hope that one of the Russian engineers aboard the ship had made a surreptitious video of the flight tests and uploaded it to Youtube. Regrettably no such skulduggery seems to be taking place.

I did, however, find a clip from May 2011 showing the MiG-29KUB performing flight tests from the Russian carrier Admiral Kuzntesov.

The Vikramaditya that India is buying is smaller than the Kuznetsov, and a heavily modified Kiev class ship. The Cold War era Kievs embarked a handful of the risible Yak-38 Forger and 20 Kamov helicopters, with the foredeck occupied by anti-surface and anti-aircraft missiles. It was designed to be a formidable warship even without the embarked aircraft.

The Kuznetsov is more like a US carrier, although it did pack some cool anti-surface missiles in vertical launch tubes beneath hatches under the flight deck. The Russians think of some really cool stuff. 

Anyway, back to the Vikrmaditya. Mindef is probably not getting back to me because they want to do a big PR event when the first Indian pilot lands on the ship. Can't blame them: the Vikramaditya is a huge advance for Indian naval air, and the type of thing military PR guys love to play up. Sooner or later we'll be hearing a lot more about this ship. 

Book Review: Boeing 787 Dreamliner

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

As if I was not getting enough of an aviation fix at Farnborough last week, I decided to read the Kindle version of 'Boeing 787 Dreamliner' by journalist Guy Norris and photographer Mark Wagner to help me decompress after the show at night.

Norris, I am told, formerly worked for Flight - he lists a number of past and present Flight journalists in the acknowledgements - and is now at a rival publication.

For a good understanding of the issues and challenges involved in developing a modern aircraft this is a great read.  As it was published in 2009, it misses more recent developments in the programme and the 787's service entry in late 2011.

I found the early chapters most fascinating, because here Norris discusses the Sonic Cruiser at length. The 787, it turns out, was originally a 'reference' type against which airlines could assess the Sonic Cruiser concept. While aviation fans no doubt regret that the Sonic Cruiser never saw the light of day - that thing sure did look cool - the airlines simply didn't want it.

The book also sheds light on Boeing's decision to forgo further development of the 747 series in the 1990s. Again, lukewarm airlines.

Norris does a superb job explaining why the 787 is special: the revolutionary use of composites, the aircraft's innovative use of fly by wire technology, and its space age power system. He also spends a good deal of time discussing the Rolls Royce Trent 1000 and GE GEnx engines and how this pair was chosen over Pratt & Whitney's alternative.

Norris also captures the heady optimism of the 787's early days. One gem is Boeing's promise to the Chinese carriers that all of them would have the 787 in time for the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Oops!

Like a horror novel in which things just keep getting worse for the protagonists, the programme's problems start to mount: unfinished subassemblies arrive unlabelled in Seattle, there is a severe shortage of fasteners, and quality control becomes a major problem. Boeing eventually sorted all this out, but only at great cost to its prestige and after serious delays.

Although 'Boeing 787 Dreamliner' is a satisfying read, it would have been good to learn more about Boeing's interactions with airline customers as programme delays became legion. What were customers saying to Boeing executives? How, specifically, did the 787's late entry hurt the airlines' plans for specific routes? What compromises was Boeing forced to make to keep customers waiting?

Given that the 787 has yet to enter service for most of the carriers who will eventually fly it, these questions are still very sensitive. Most of the key players involved in developing, selling, and buying the aircraft are still very much in play. Thus, reminiscing about meeting room battles is not something 787 stakeholders will be keen to do for several years. 

By the time they are willing to open up, the 787 will be a reliable and ubiquitous work horse, warranting barely a glance as it slides up to the boarding gate. Boeing, Airbus, and the world's other airframers will have moved on to other developmental dramas.



787 book cover.jpg

A cursory glance at Asia's presence at Farnborough this year

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Thumbnail image for IMG_20120708_105431.jpg

With just over 12 hours before the Farnborough air show kicks off in earnest - the Flightglobal team has already been working hard to produce tomorrow's show daily - I thought it would be good to outline the Asian presence at the show this year.

The most visible Asian presence is the Malaysia Airlines A380, which dominates the static line. There is also a CRJ in China Express Airlines livery, and an AW139 in the livery of Malaysia's Weststar, which will use the type to ferry oil workers to and from offshore rigs.

IMG_20120708_151847.jpg

Walked all over the place and could not find the Korea Aerospace Industries  T-50, but KAI has asked me to meet them at it tomorrow at 4pm. Perhaps it just has not arrived yet. The biggest disappointment was the  no-show of the JF-17 and CATIC - this after I wrote a big feature about  China's fighter escort prospects. 

COMAC, meanwhile, has a big stand. My colleague Mavis has written an excellent feature about China's commercial aerospace ambitions that is available in the FG Club - which is free to join. India's HAL has a huge chalet, but when I swung by earlier it was largely empty.  Not sure what they are  flogging here. With luck I'll be able to get a meeting with the company's new chairman. Several big Japanese companies are also present.

Look forward to seeing how much Asian carriers swell the order books of the big airframers over the next few days. 



Enhanced by Zemanta

PICTURE: Thai Smile takes delivery of its first aircraft

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Thai Smile, a subsidiary of Thai Airways International, has taken delivery of its first aircraft, an Airbus A320.

The aircraft, named Ubon Ratchathani, was delivered to the carrier on 28 June in Hamburg.

Airbus -  A320_THAI_SMILE.JPG

© Airbus

Thai Smile will initially start operations with services from Bangkok to Macau, before operating on domestic routes to Krabi, Chiang Mai, Surat Thani and Phuket.