Archives

Subscribe by E-mail

Recently in Military Category

VIDEO: view of Avalon from KC-30A taking off

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Last week at the Avalon air show I had a unique opportunity to fly aboard the RAAF's new KC-30A while it conducted the air-to-air refuelling of two F/A-18C aircraft.  I was super busy at the show, so only now do I have the chance to post my photos and a video of the trip.

Riding the KC-30A (AKA Airbus Military A330 Multi-Role Tanker Transport) is, well, like flying in an airline. Aside from the lack of IFE, the interior is identical to that used by Qantas in its A330s. 

Immediately below is a video of the takeoff that gives a good perspective of the Avalon show: static park, chalets, and the C-17 used in the flying display. Just below this is a clip blogger Mike Yeo (@thebaseleg) put together that shows the refuelling itself.  He also wrote a great blog entry about the trip. 




IMG_20130227_141734.jpg
IMG_20130227_140558.jpg
IMG_20130227_141556.jpg















"That's right, Ice Man. I am dangerous."

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

During lunch last week my colleague @runwaycontact and I were standing around Changi Business Park waiting for some passport photos to be developed - just part of the significant waiting required for attending Aero India.

We noticed a trailer for the 2012 South Korean movie Soar into the Sun playing outside a video shop.  Although I've become used to inaccurate depictions of military equipment - aircraft especially - over the years, this video really takes the cake. 

That said, I'd love to see a T-50 - or any jet, for that matter - do a last minute tail stand in the middle of a city, blowing women's skirts all over the place. I've also never seen a jet's afterburners shred an office building's windows.  That would be a neat trick at an air show.

And if the fighter action is no enough, the film also appears to offer good dialogue:

Officer 1: Why did you accept such a troublemaker?

Officer 2: Because he's too good.

Hmmm, what 1980s film could have inspired those lines? 

Must read: Chinese Aerospace Power, Emerging Maritime Roles

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

For readers with a more than passing interest in Asia Pacific military affairs, Chinese Aerospace Power, Emerging Maritime Roles is the book for you.  Edited by China defence experts Andrew Erickson and Lyle Goldstein, the book is a series of essays and papers about China's capabilities and possible intentions in regard to the use of air and space assets in a war off its coast. It also spells out the implications of this for the US air force and US navy.

 The book is divided into five sections:

1) Chinese Aerospace Development, Emerging Maritime Roles

2) Chinese ISR and counter-ISR

3) Contrasting strategies: protecting bastions or projecting power?

4) Maritime strike: air-launched cruise missiles

5) Maritime strike: ballistic missiles

6) Maritime implications of Chinese Aerospace Power

What's not to like?

For those who think China would be a pushover for the USA, the book provides sobering reading. In the event of a conflict, China is gearing up to fight intense, high-technology conflicts close to its shores. The crux of China's strategy would be to reduce enemy air bases in the region with ballistic and cruise missiles.

In regard to American warships, the much touted DF-21D anti-ship ballistic missile would not necessarily be used to sink ships, but possibly shower them with sub munitions. A rain of bomblets falling upon an aircraft carrier's deck would create havoc and certainly result in a mission kill. One of the writers in the book says the test of such a system - presumably against a fast moving ship far out at sea - would be a public relations coup similar to China's test of an anti-satellite missile in 2007.

Even if the DF-21D does not prove as effective as advertised, firing off volleys of ballistic missiles toward the general vicinity of American carrier battle groups would force AEGIS escorts to expend valuable anti-ballistic missiles. Eventually the magazine capacity of these  warships would be exhausted, again resulting in a mission kill for the carrier group.

Chinese Aerospace Power also discusses areas of weakness. China appears to have a long way to go before it can mount successful joint forces attacks, say involving ballistic missiles and air-launched cruise missiles striking an enemy base simultaneously.  For long range strikes, there is also some question about the speed of its sensor-to-shooter abilities: i.e. it may identify a target, but does it have the command and control structure to shoot quickly enough? China also has a long, long way to go in key areas such as long range anti-submarine warfare, airborne early warning & control, and air-to-air refuelling.

Nonetheless, this a timely and well written book that puts issues around China's airpower in useful perspective. 

VIDEO: Skipper of China's first carrier speaks

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

It's been a big few weeks for China, with the emergence of a new fighter (J-21? J-31? F-60?) and this week's christening of the Liaoning, China's first aircraft carrier. It's a good sign they didn't name it Shi Lang after the historic admiral who invaded Taiwan in 1683. Of course, they could always call their next (and certainly more capable) aircraft carrier after this grand individual.

The big question, of course, is when the Liaoning will commence flight tests. In the below Youtube interview with the ship's captain I listened carefully for a first flight date, but he kept mum on this. I guess the reporter was under orders not to ask. For my part, I would have pressed him hard on this.



With luck Beijing will give the commencement of flight ops the same heavy coverage given to the christening. Perhaps Hu Jintao or Wen Jiaobao will fly out to the ship to watch Su-33s performing arrested landings and ramp-assisted take offs.

Though the Liaoning will never be as capable as a US carrier, it sounds like it will be more fun. Buried in an article entitled "Q&A about aircraft carrier "Liaoning Ship"" on the defence ministry web site, I found this paragraph about the crew's R&R options:

"The aircraft carrier "Liaoning ship" has messes, supermarket, post office, laundry rooms, gym, rubbish disposal stations and so on. Even the bars have both the noisy type and the quiet type. Therefore, the life is relatively convenient on board."

Sadly, the US Navy has no bars - either noisy or quiet - on any of its ships. This extends back to 1914 and secretary of the navy Josephus Daniels, a rabid abolitionist.

How cool would it be to stand on the bridge of the Liaoning, beer in hand, observing Su-33s? Wow.

PICTURES: Cockpit pics of Chinese JH-7s on the deck

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Came across some cool shots on my favorite Chinese web site (China Defense Mashup) of Xian JH-7 fighter bombers on the deck snapped by a People's Liberation Army Navy pilot.

In the book I'm now reading - Chinese Aerospace Power: Evolving Maritime Roles - one of the contributors talks about PLAN pilot training as the role of PLAN air assets evolve. In the past, PLAN aircraft were mainly tasked with defending naval bases and ports, but a major emphasis is now placed on using aircraft to hit naval targets far out at sea.

As such, one key area of pilot training is low altitude ingress tactics coupled with precision munitions. Apparently Chinese military thinkers were impressed by Argentina's effective use of such tactics against the technologically superior Royal Navy during the Falklands war of 1982. 


Thumbnail image for 7822136584_bbee5a305f_z.jpg
7822065842_dc1f8c0d13_z.jpg
7822064998_9a094b8163_z.jpg

PICTURE: Shaanxi Y-8 variant with side looking radar?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
strange y-8 variant.jpg

During my morning stroll through China's defence web sites I came across what could be yet another version of the Shaanxi Y-8, the four-engined turboprop that China seems to adapt to every role imaginable.

The bulges on the right side of the fuselage suggest side-looking synthetic aperture radar, but not sure about the winglets on the tips of the horizontal stabilizers, or the large wing-tip fairings.

Coincidentally this image has emerged just a few days after photos of what could be a tested for a new carrier-borne AEW&C aircraft.

Never a dull moment following China.  

Give me your thoughts on twitter: @AsiaJetWatch

Surprise! All of China's military kit was developed at home

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Z-10 is an Chinese attack helicopter.jpg
Chinese defence ministry spokesman Yang Yujun has defended the indigenous nature of the  AVIC Z-10 attack helicopter. This follows United Technologies' (UTC) admission in June that it knowingly supplied China with a Pratt & Whitney Canada engine for the type.

Basically, the Chinese are saying "we built it on our own," while UTC has paid a $75 million fine for supplying an engine in addition to hundreds of other arms export violations.

Here is what the Chinese have to say (full text here):

A Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Thursday refuted reports that China's military attack helicopter Z-10 pirated U.S. technologies, saying the helicopter's manufacturer had used independent intellectual property rights...

"China's attack helicopters and their engines are all self-developed, and have proprietary intellectual property rights," said Yang, adding that the so-called piracy "is far from truth."

What gives? I was going to write a formal story about this statement, it was even on the day's to-do list, but I just cannot bring myself to take these comments at face value. And then, halfway through the release, the spokesman drops this bomb:

Yang said the development of China's military equipment has always followed the principle of independent innovation, and relied on its own capability in research and production.

Wow.

Where do I start? Reverse engineering the Su-27 to create the J-11B? The use of Lavi blueprints in the development of the J-10? Guys busted trying to smuggle fighter components from Russia to China? And why does the Z-9 look exactly like the Dauphin?

Either Yang has a very, very dry sense of humour or he's been hitting the party-line Kool Aid very hard indeed. Perhaps UTC can use these comments to tender an appeal? 

Chinese J-21 Emerges! (well, something emerges - sort of)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
j21.jpg

The China Defense Blog and other Chinese defence sites have revealed photos of a mysterious airframe travelling aboard the back of a truck, apparently from the Shenyang Aircraft Corporation to Xian Aircraft Company.

This is no J-20 moment: there has yet to be a magical appearance on a runway, followed by obsessive tweeting and blogging about a first flight.

In the photos this new fighter airframe is draped by a camouflage covering and is riding unglamorously along a highway. It bears a morbid resemblance to those photos of retired RAAF F-111's being towed to museums or landfills. Either the tail has yet to be mounted or was remove to help the rig pass under bridges. In any case this isn't a real aircraft just yet, just a large portion of an aircraft to be.

Some bloggers have speculated that this new type is a supplement to the heavy weight, MiG-31-class Chengdu J-20, which continues flight tests at Chengdu. One blogger even said it could be an export type to compete with the F-35. This export idea is a bit farfetched: China (with Pakistan) needs to get JF-17 sales off the ground before even pondering something as ambitious as an F-35 alternative.

So what is it? Judging from the photos, the type will have two engines. Unlike the J-20, there does not seem to be an obvious place for canards. I am intrigued by the protrusion just above the intake. This is too far along the fuselage for the cockpit. Dare I suggest that this is a lift fan door, similar to that found on the F-35B? That would be cool.

Flightglobal will be at Zhuhai in force this November. With luck we will learn more there - or perhaps this aircraft will one day make a J-20 style appearance, surprising us all. 

PICTURES: Thai air force museum, home of some seriously exotic aircraft

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Bangkok: city of great food, smiling people, awesome massages, and much more. During a recent weekend there my friend suggested we take his five year old son to the Royal Thai Air Force museum out near Don Muang airport.

"My son especially likes this big transport plane with a ramp at the back," said he.

His son's favourite aircraft turned out to be a Fairchild C-123B Provider that has seen better days. Its engines are gone and the seats have no cushions, but there are still plenty of switches to flip in the cockpit and a great jump seat outside the cockpit door above the ladder.  Its cargo hold seemed to be as wide, if not a bit wider, than that of a C-130. For me, the coolest part of the C-123B turned out to be the Fairchild logo proudly displayed on the rudder pedals.

Other highlights include an F8F-1 Bearcat. I had no idea that the RTAF flew this beast of a piston fighter, and that they received 204 of the type, which served from 1951-1960. There was also a great old Supermarine Spitfire XIV with a big Thai roundel. The RTAF had 34 of the type in the early fifties, including four PR19 reconaissance examples.

There were also a range of cool helicopters, such as the Westland WS-51 Dragonfly, Sikorsky Yr-6A, and Hiller UH-12B Raven.

The collection included some locally developed and produced aircraft that likely can't be found anywhere else in the world. For instance, how many aviation geeks are aware that the first aircraft completely designed and built by Thais was a two seat biplane called the Baribatra? The type served from 1927 to 1940.

For serious military aviation geeks the RTAF museum is well worth a visit.

IMG_20120617_102204.jpg

IMG_20120617_102417.jpg

IMG_20120617_102809.jpg

IMG_20120617_103629.jpg

IMG_20120617_103748.jpg

IMG_20120617_103936.jpg

IMG_20120617_104652.jpg

IMG_20120617_104917.jpg

IMG_20120617_104950.jpg

IMG_20120617_110957.jpg

IMG_20120617_115032.jpg

IMG_20120617_115250.jpg

PHOTOS: RNZAF UH-1H's loaded onto RAAF C-17

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

The New Zealand Defence Force has released photos of RNZAF Bell UH-1H Iroqouis helicopters being loaded onto a RAAF Boeing C-17 for transport to Papua New Guinea to help out in election monitoring.

Though I've seen the C-17 at air shows and had a chance to walk around inside, I'm still blown away by how massive the cargo hold is. The UH-1H is a pretty big helo, but it is dwarfed by the C-17.

Boeing recently said that India, which has confirmed orders for 10 C-17s, could buy 6-8 more. 

20120612_OH_K1023900_0007.jpg

20120612_OH_K1023900_0009.jpg

20120612_OH_K1023900_0010.jpg

20120612_OH_K1023900_0014.jpg