The Great Debate: UAV vs UAS

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0) |

As far as unmanned aviation has come in the last decade, it remains the rare niche aviation market that can't agree on what to call its signature product.

As an acronym, do we call them a UAV, UA or UAS? As a word, should we describe them as unmanned, uninhabited or unpiloted?

Never one to join the crowd, the US Air Force has coined its own new term: Remotely Operated Aircraft (ROA, anyone? Frankly, we think that's already DOA, or should be).

Now, the US Department of Defense is proposing to settle this nomenclature madness once and for all. Here is DOD's new and long-awaited Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap. Among other things, it decrees the term UAV is passé.

Henceforth, the DOD will recognize two terms: an unmanned aircraft (UA) and an unmanned aircraft system (UAS). The UA is to be used when referring to the flying component of a UAS, which refers to a ground station linked with one or more UAs.

"This change in terminology more clearly emphasizes that the aircraft is only one component of the system, and is in line with the Federal Aviation Administration's decision to treat 'UAVs' as aircraft for regulatory purposes," a footnote reads.

There may be some logic to this. It reflects the fact that unmanned flight requires more than just an aircraft to work - and, thus, for governments to regulate. And it substitutes the smoother word, "aircraft", for the clunky and possibly anachronistic term,"air vehicle." (Who came up with "unmanned air vehicle" anyway? Any theories?)

But there is a catch. Even if the aim is to clarify, it doesn't do you any favours if few others in the English-speaking world know the difference between a UAS and a UA. Or, for that matter, a UAS and a UAV.

It is something we're thinking about among our editorial team. Flight International uses the term UAV, which has its flaws but at least is commonly understood. This may have to be discarded at some point, but we are asking two questions: when? and with what?

Technorati tag:

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The Great Debate: UAV vs UAS.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4084

1 Comments

Dear Stephen,

I see initiatives like this one could create even more confussion in the aviation community.

For me it is cristal clear that the acronym UAV meaning "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle" is perfect for the purpose of identifying all types of vehicles (i.e. fixed wing, rotary wing and aerostat).

Following this line, the acronym UAS meaning "Unmanned Aerial System" is perfect to identify the whole system and not just the vehicle.

Consequently, I would advise not to change unnecesarily these terms in order to benefit from all these years of using acronym UAV to describe a..... UAV.

Best regards,

A. Arjonilla

Agustin Arjonilla

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Stephen Trimble published on August 10, 2005 5:13 PM.

Discovery is safe, but what next for the fleet? was the previous entry in this blog.

BA's perfect storm is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31