Photos: onboard the Royal Air Force's new BAE Systems Nimrod MRA4

| | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0) |

Yesterday's Farnborough air show saw a long-awaited and welcome boost for the UK Royal Air Force, with the confirmation of a production order for 12 of BAE Systems' new generation Nimrod MRA4 maritime reconnaisance and attack aircraft. Announced by UK secretary of state for defence Des Browne and BAE chief executive Mike Turner, the milestone ceremony was followed by the first public appearance of an MRA4, with prototype aircraft PA03 taking time out of its busy test programme to conduct two fly-bys. The contract's confirmation had been expected this week, as reported in the latest issue of Flight International.


Nimrod MRA4 - CH.jpg


I've been lucky enough to see the MRA4 up close at BAE's Warton site in Lancashire twice over the last year or so, but this was my first opportunity to see the RAF's future version of the Mighty Hunter airborne. Already easily distinguished from the service's current Nimrod MR2 by its increased size and by the range of exotic lumps and bumps which are set about its fuselage, the MRA4 is also markedly different from its predecessor by its engine characteristics. The most striking thing about the new aircraft is that it sounds like a large business jet on the wing, and gone too are the plumes of black smoke that betray the presence of the MR2's Rolls-Royce Speys.


My last visit to Warton on 4 July threw up a unique opportunity to get inside the belly of the RAF's largest intelligence, surveillance, target acquisition and reconnaissance beast of the future, and to talk to the joint BAE and RAF flight test team which is assessing the type's capabilities. The aircraft features a new glass cockpit, with "the office" now to accomodate a flight crew of just two pilots.


MRA4 PA03 cockpit - CH.jpg


Down the back, the MRA4's seven onboard operator stations bring a sophisticated look and deliver improved ergonomics for the weapon system's tactical operators.


MRA4 PA03 rear - CH.jpg


But the tiny size of the platform's galley is a cause of concern to the test team, which could one day be called upon to demonstrate the aircraft's maximum 14h endurance. As one RAF officer notes with alarm: "How are you supposed to prepare a decent curry using this?" Unless this is sorted by 2009, the Nimrod community's reputation as a "formation eating club" could be in danger!


BAE will freeze the external design of the MRA4 late this year, and the programme's three prototypes - which will later be modified to the final production configuration - will complete flight test activities during 2008. The RAF will have to wait until 2010 to form its first squadron of new Nimrods at its Kinloss base in Scotland's Morayshire, but you know what they say about good things...

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Photos: onboard the Royal Air Force's new BAE Systems Nimrod MRA4.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4224

3 Comments

A good thing? How long ago was this ordered? How late is it? How much cheaper would it have been to order American? How incredibly uneconomic is it to order 12 essentially custom-made aircraft? And how much smaller than a snow-ball's chance in hell is the likelihood of selling even one aircraft to anyone other than the RAF?

(Wikipedia's entry on the Nimrod has some truly staggering figures on how late and how over budget the MRA4 program is:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawker-Siddeley_Nimrod )

Tell us again why the MRA4 is a good thing?

enplaned

Very true, the project is about seven years late and about 」1 billion over budget, despite the fleet size having dropped from an orignal 21 aircraft order in 1996 to just 12 today. The simple answer is that no-one knows how much cheaper or quicker the alternative solution - a rehashed P-3 Orion - would have been to deliver, but I strongly doubt that it would have had the over-land ISTAR potential that the MRA4 has already demonstrated. Add to that the US Navy's planned transition to the P-8A MMA and the UK's capability would have been very quickly left behind. And I don't believe anyone ever genuinely expected to export an MRA4, despite some past talk of marketing it to Japan and the USA.
So why is the MRA4 a good thing? It will be substantially better than the MR2s it is to replace, and will operate seamlessly within the UK's network-enabled capability framework. And the people from the Nimrod community I've spoken to can't wait to get their hands on it, which to my mind is the most important factor of all.

Craig Hoyle

I always dream of airframe design,propulsion systems right from elementary school but gradually the hope I have for all of this is dying due to harshness of reality and u guys are not making it any easier for in Africa.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Craig Hoyle published on July 19, 2006 6:15 PM.

Randy Baseler talks about his blog (and Airbus) was the previous entry in this blog.

Farnborough: China in your hands is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

September 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30