A broad look at the QANTAS/Jetstar 787 cancellation and deferral


The news came early this morning in Sydney, that Australia’s largest airline, Qantas had made significant changes to its 787 order, deferring the 15 787-8s it was supposed to receive starting in mid-2010 for Jetstar, while canceling 15 additional 787-9s scheduled for delivery in 2014 and 2015.

First, lets examine the changes:

  • Jetstar’s first 15 787s will now be 787-9s, not 787-8s and will arrive in mid-2013.
  • The 15 deferred 787-8s will be put into domestic operations starting in the 4th quarter of 2014 over the following 12 months.
  • The remaining 20 787-9 will be for Qantas and Jetstar operations, with the first deliveries in the 4th quarter of 2015 through 2017.
  • Total firm order stands at 50 787s, down from 65, with options for 50 more

Qantas cited the volatile economic climate as the reason for the significant shift in its order, and noted that the latest delay in first flight had no bearing on the decision. The deferral negotiation was first announced on April 14th when the airline delayed its A380 deliveries.

Though the cancellation of 15 787-9s is very significant for the 787 program, lowering the total orderbook to 840 units from 56 customers, the disclosure of the revised plans for the aircraft is perhaps the more significant story.

Qantas was originally allocated three aircraft – LN21/24/27 – in theearly 787-8 production run. That number was later increased to five with LN22and LN29 reallocated to the Australian carrier after Delta/Northwestdisclosed it was retooling its delivery schedule. These early 787swould have benefited from the second blockpoint weight improvements that are planned for LN20.

Ofthe first 30 787s being built, 24 are production standard aircraft.Since 2007, seven of 12 787 launch customers have deferred theirdeliveries of the block of the first 30 aircraft. The five airlines areDelta/Northwest, Air China, Shanghai, China Eastern, Grand China Air,China Southern and now Qantas.

The question becomes which customers backfills the 15 open spots on the 2010 787 delivery calendar. Just last week, Pat Shanahan, vice president of airplane programs at Boeing affirmed that early demand for 787s continued unabated despite the economic downturn. As a result, Boeing maintains its goals for its production pace even with the latest delay in first flight and the uncertainty of the overall schedule.

Long Enough legs?
Before today’s order shift, one source very familiar with the airline’splanning says that a configuration of up to 330 passengers was beingconsidered for the Jetstar 787-8s to connect Australia to Europe. The source adds that the 787-8 would have been able to perform thatmission, but not without two intermediate fuel stops, a reality thatlikely played into the airline’s decision making. The increasing emptyweight of the -8 and resulting reduced performance at these high loadswould have economically prohibited the high density European routes with the 787-8.

The switch by Qantas to the 787-9 is a further “feather in the cap” for the first 787 derivative, which will benefit from what is learned during flight test on the 787-8 its first years in service with a longer range. Though, the deployment of the -8 beginning toward the end of 2014 on only domestic operations as a 767-300ER replacement within Australia speaks volumes about how the airline perceives the future performance of the airplane and timelines for weight reduction.

AirAsia X Factor
The Jetstar competitive landscape is also crucial to understanding the motivation of the airline. Kuala Lumpur-based Air Asia X has had bold plans to expand its low-cost, long-haul network to the US and to Europe.

Australia Aviation blogger and journalist Ben Sandilands captured the competition:

And AirAsia and Jetstar are competing new model trans border lowfare airline franchises. The business models are identical, and not yetfully proven, just like the jets they have chosen for future long hauloperations.

Both have international divisions, with AirAsia X the Malaysia basedbrand’s long haul subsidiary already flying A330s to Kuala Lumpur fromthe Gold Coast, Melbourne and Perth, with Sydney expected to beconfirmed soon.

Their international ambitions also overlap on the ‘kangaroo routes’between Australia and Europe, where the originally promised, repeatedlypromised, long range capabilities of the 787-8 would allow Qantas tore-enter markets such as Amsterdam, Rome and Manchester and expand thenetwork into new ones.

Those promises turned to dust. The Qantas strategy for Jetstar, atleast as far as timing is concerned, has been usurped by AirAsia X, andto say that senior management has been embarrassed and very unhappywith the situation is an understatement that quickly cost Boeing $292million in cash compensation.

At the Paris Air Show last week, AirAsia announced a firm order for 10 A350-900 aircraft seating 400 in a two-class layout with a 10-abreast economy seating. First deliveries of the aircraft are due to take place in the first quarter of 2016. Before the delays stalled the program, Jetstar’s first 787-8s were to arrive in August 2008, later revised to June 2010.

AirAsia launched service to London-Stansted on March 11th of this year using an A340-300, after detailing its expansion last October. Had the 787-8 arrived in Jetstar’s fleet on time in 2008, the airline would’ve had a low cost carrier with access to the the European market ahead of AirAsia, however the change of forture for the 787 program has given the Malaysian carrier a lead into Europe.

For Jetstar, selecting the larger -9 to launch service to the US and Europe against AirAsia’s A350 XWB will pit the larger 787 against its composite rival, with a more equivalent ability to pack its planes in a high capacity configuration.

7 Responses to A broad look at the QANTAS/Jetstar 787 cancellation and deferral

  1. Christopher Dye June 26, 2009 at 8:28 pm #

    Jon – Has Boeing finalized the 787-9′s payload/range specs, and if so could tell us what they are?

  2. jsarf June 27, 2009 at 12:54 am #

    How to plan for weight improvements without a validated model ?

  3. Uwe June 27, 2009 at 4:45 am #

    > The question becomes which customers backfills the 15 open spots on the 2010 787 delivery calendar

    Santa flies first this year!

    Under the assumption that first flight will happen
    before New Year 2009 Boeing will take at least
    another 12 month for certification. ( Independent
    of what the ministry of truth sends to the press )

    Thus there will be _no_ delivery slots in 2010.
    Additionally I do not see a lot of deliveries
    in 2011 ( getting all those hickups fixed into
    manufacturing is a very large job on its own.


  4. Vero Venia June 27, 2009 at 6:19 am #

    Please follow the link

    US-Australia routes will be a crowded sky.
    Qantas needs to re-assess their strategy. Perhaps they will cancel other aircraft types.

  5. Khoa Huynh June 27, 2009 at 10:15 am #

    “Australia to Europe. The source adds that the 787-8 would have been able to perform that mission [with 330 pax], but not without two intermediate fuel stops”

    From a superficial perspective – that’s not great is it ?

  6. 7K7 June 27, 2009 at 1:04 pm #

    All those planes will be incredibly uncomfortable for such long flights at such high densities.

  7. herbal colon cleansing November 19, 2010 at 1:55 am #

    I bought this product with the idea of losing some weight. When I first tried this product combination, I did not notice much of a change, but over the weeks the difference was noticeable. I notice this product and a little exercise a week makes great results!