Archives

March 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

July 2011 Archives

Air India Lifts off

First flight of Air India's 787 cut short by failed sensor 
Jon Ostrower/Washington, DC

Air India's first 787 made its maiden flight 31 July, though the sortie was cut short by a declared emergency traced to a failed sensor.

Operating as Boeing 233, Airplane 29, wearing Air India's colours, departed Paine Field at Boeing's Everett, Washington facility at 12:46 local time on a standard B-1 production flight for an initial checkout of the aircraft's systems.

Dubbed ZA233, the aircraft took off with an estimated 5h of fuel aboard and four crew, according to recorded air traffic communications (via Matt Cawby).

The flight marked only the third production 787 to fly to date, with the first, Airplane Nine, ZA102, flying in January, followed in March by Airplane 23, ZA177, for Japan Airlines.

Minutes after departure, the aircraft reported that it was "working a little bit of a flap problem and we might be returning" to Everett before formally declaring an emergency at 12:55, requesting a return to Paine Field, citing an issue with its flight controls.

Boeing says the aircraft "performed a safe landing" at 13:12 local time and the issue was traced to a failed sensor. The airframer declined to offer any additional information on the type of the sensor or nature of the flight control issue.

The aircraft is expected to be eventually registered as VT-AND, but has been assigned a temporary US registration of N1006N.

The aircraft, which is powered by two General Electric GEnx-1B engines, is expected to be ferried to San Antonio, Texas where Boeing has established a refurbishment and change incorporation facility for both 787s and 747-8s. Air India'a first will join ZA177, which has been in Texas since March.

The airframer expects initial type certification of the 787 with Rolls-Royce Package A Trent 1000 engines in late August, with General Electric certification to come later in the fourth quarter.

First delivery to Air India is slated for sometime late in the fourth quarter.
Photo Credit James Polivka
Air Berlin Boeing 737-800 D-ABKU

With all the discussion about the now seemingly uncertain future for Renton and its role on the re-engined 737, set off by comments yesterday from the company's CEO, it's important to note how the line achieved the status of "one of the great aerospace factories in the world." The credit, in large measure goes to Carolyn Corvi, who until 2008 was Boeing Commercial Airplanes vice president of Airplane Programs. 

Corvi played an integral role in the company's lean transition, implementing the moving lines first on the 737 and later the 777. The 50% cut in 737 flow time that resulted has laid the groundwork for the company's plans today to advance to 42 airplanes per month in 2014.

Corvi was instrumental in Boeing's path toward continuous production improvement, earning her the title The Queen of Lean fostering its adoption at all levels inside the company.

In October, Corvi will be awarded the Museum of Flight's Pathfinder award, recognizing those with connections to the Pacific Northwest who have made significant contributions to the development of aerospace. Past honorees include Joe Sutter, T.A. Wilson, Bill Allen, Scott Crossfield and Tex Johnston.

Corvi joined Boeing in 1974 holding a variety of leadership positions, eventually serving as vice president and general manager of the 737 program in 2000, and later in 2002 combined general manager and vice president of the 757 program. In 2005, Corvi was appointed vice president of commercial airplane production, where she served until her retirement at the end of 2008 when she was followed by then-787 program vice president and general manager, Pat Shanahan.

After leaving Boeing, Corvi was elected to the Goodich board of directors in June 2009 and later Continental (now United Airlines) board of directors in December 2009 and now serves as Drector of Virginia Mason Medical Center where she is the chairman of the Medical Center and Health System. In short, Corvi transitioned from brining lean techniques and continuous improvement from aircraft production to heath care. The result was Virginia Mason being named the top hospital of the decade by the Leapfrog Group.
737 Final Assembly Line

Jim Albaugh, CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes, made a comment last week on the sidelines at the American Airlines order announcement in Dallas that initially escaped my note, in response to a question about the industrial footprint for re-engining the 737 and Renton's role in building the updated narrowbody:
Albaugh: We need to look hard at what we can do within the four walls [of the Renton factory] and if the demand is there we'll have to look at: do you need to build a new factory and where might you put it? But we're getting way ahead of ourselves we just made the announcement to do it, we made the decision to do it a few weeks ago, but in the event that we need more capacity we'll look and made the best decision for Boeing.
That question was revisited in today's second quarter earnings call by CEO Jim McNerney:

Ken Herbert, Wedbush Securities: You've talked about narrow body rates now a few times getting to a 50-60 range, as you think about the cost profile of this program, how should we think about understanding considering some of the limitations up in Renton. How narrow body production may evolve to potentially support, to maintain some of your margin while at the same time looking at some of the rates you've thrown out there the next five to ten years:

Boeing CEO Jim McNerney: We haven't made the final decision on where we're going to produce the re-engined airplane, your question implies though that after the 42 per month, we do run into some challenges if Renton were the choice, some capital expenditures there to increase it. But we have other options and we're going to study them all as we think it through. But, demand could easily be that high in the timeframe we're talking about and the good news is we have options.

KH: To what extent could South Carolina step in and meet some of that demand for you?

JM: It would depend as we studied it for how competitive they could be as compared to a Renton or compared to another site, if we would study it all and come up with a decision that would make the most sense for our customers and the company.

Continuing later on...

And depending on how it goes [in South Carolina], we'll have to see how competitive the factory is. We're going to invest to make it as competitive as we can. But I think it's fair to say, just getting the 87 done over then next few years is a big challenge and we are going to succeed. But over the next few years, I don't want to dilute the effort down there with other new airplanes right away, so it could be an option down the road on re-engine, it's not at the top of the list right now."

Dominic Gates, Seattle Times: I'm a little surprised to hear you opening up this option, you hope to produce 50 to 60 narrowbodies but the end of the decade per month, so you're now talking about not doing the re-engine in Renton, that seems like such a surprising thing to bring up. You've got your most efficient line of all your aircraft programs, you've actually got a third line - which does have the complication of being an ITAR line - but it seems like in Renton you do have all the options you could possibly want to make that airplane there. Are you seriously considering doing a re-engining somewhere else? Charleston doesn't even do metal airplanes, or is this a matter of just trying to keep your options open. And what's the effect on morale of the Renton workforce when you raise this, what'd I have to call a spectre, of putting work elsewhere?

JM: Well listen, Renton is one of the great aerospace factories in the world, obviously, the idea of putting a lot of work, a lot of narrowbodies there is very attractive, I think the spirit which I was answering the question was: Until we have sorted out the milestones associated with the ramp up, the degree to which we have to modify the airplane, there would be major investments in Renton, beyond the currently planned for production rates. Until we sort that all out we can't confirm where we're going to put it precisely. But would putting it in renton be a good option? Yes.

DG: All your supply chain converges on Renton. To put it somewhere else means having Wichita send it elsewhere. It seems like more investment to do it elsewhere.

JM: I think until we study it all...Renton has a strong case, but again, Dominic, there is significant investment that we'd have to make some place beyond the current rates that we're contemplating and until we understand exactly what the plane will be and what rate we have to build it, I think we have to study that and figure it out.
The investment, put simply, appears to a back of the napkin equation: Is the cost of setting up a greenfield site higher or lower than the cost of tooling and equipment it would take to expand line three in Renton? 

Paradoxically, as it heads into the 2012 labor negotiations with the International Association of Machinists, Boeing's own stated desire for labor stability is perhaps lost when it introduces uncertainty within its own workforce. Boeing was quick to try and walk back McNerney's comments about the future of Renton, saying "We're committed to [Renton]. Jim (McNerney) might have omitted some things."
Boeing's second-quarter earnings are out and the 787 and 747-8 2011 delivery guidance has been cut by 10 from 25-40 to 25-30 combined units. The airframer gave no initial indication of how the units would be split between the types, but if previous reporting and analyst estimates are accurate, it will be heavily weighted toward 747. The commercial unit now anticipates delivering between 485 and 495 aircraft in 2011.

Also, the initial release provided no guidance on the 787-9 timeline, saying only that it expected first delivery of the 787-8 and 747-8 later in the third quarter. The 747-8F first delivery guidance rhetoric has slowly shifted from "mid-2011" now to third quarter 2011. Additionally, the release holds no mention of re-engining the 737, which is expected to be a major topic of the company's 10:30 AM ET earnings call with CEO Jim McNerney and CFO James Bell.
Boeing 787 Dreamliner N787BA ZA001

With final certification submittals to the US Federal Aviation Administration in sight, Boeing aims to deliver the first 787 to Japan's All Nippon Airways around the third week of September, but is not likely to deliver more than five or six 787s before the close of the year, say company and industry sources, who say the slow pace of progress of reworking and outfitting each airframe is taking longer than expected.

Further, ahead of a planned critical program review in the late summer or early fall, an entry into service slip of the larger 787-9 appears almost certain, say company, supplier, industry sources pushing handover to of the first aircraft to launch customer Air New Zealand into the first half of 2014 with an additional delay of three to six months, due to a slower than expected pace of design, possibly paired with a more modest production ramp up.

Boeing said it would provide updated 2011 delivery guidance at its July 27 second quarter earnings call, but declined to say if it would update its 787-9 entry into service target from its late 2013 goal, but said its current target remains unchanged.

Yet the company's near term halt in deliveries to final assembly highlights the remaining challenges of how the 787 production system learns and achieves 10 aircraft per month by 2013, all while standing up its second final assembly line in Charleston.

Sources on both sides of the US say that completion of the 787's aft body has been of particular focus during the delivery hold, which is expected to expire in early August.

"The adjustment is due to a few production areas in the supply chain experiencing temporary challenges related to spot parts shortages and remaining engineering change incorporation," says Boeing.

Going into the month-long delivery hold, the first shipsets for the newly opened Charleston final assembly were the first to be delivered with 100% completion of assembly, the first in the program's history.

While on its surface an extremely positive development for a program that has worked for years to eliminate incomplete shipsets, multiple sources confirm that both Airplane 45 had considerably lower completion in comparison to earlier aircraft, and Airplane 47 - which has not yet been delivered to Everett - was expected to carry considered travelled work before the delivery halt.

The cause, say those with direct familiarity in Everett and Charleston, stemmed from Airplanes 45 and 47 being "cannibalized" for Airplane 46's completion.

Boeing says: "We're not confirming supplier by supplier details, nor completion of assembly by line number." 

boeingfirstwings_t600.jpg The Aerospace Learning Curve

While Boeing has sought to take advantage of lean manufacturing techniques built into the production system, the reality, and the uneveness of completion, illustrates how the lean processes have been hard to meet deeper in the supply chain.

Notably, that as completion of assembly decreases and work is pushed later in the supply chain or even to final assembly, those responsible for the task completion are denied the opportunity to learn a steady repetition in their statement of work, say those with direct familiarity with the 787's production system.

Though the 787 final assembly line in Everett is definitively improving say company sources, citing Airplane 40 as an important turning point, with the first to have all of its flight controls - including long-missing flaps - installed before leaving the factory, along with its auxiliary power unit.

Despite the steady improvement the unevenness in production, and the amount of rework required on Airplanes ahead of 40, highlight how aerospace manufacturing systems "learn" at different rates.

The industry standard places the "curve" at around 85%. An 85% learning curve denotes for every doubling of production, the cost of each completed aircraft is reduced by another 15%.

For example, if the first item is at the top of the learning curve costs $1, the second will cost $.85 to produce. The fourth will cost 85% of the second at $.72, and the eighth 85% of fourth.

"The 85% learning curve is kind of the text book long-range average," says Scott Fancher, 787 vice president and general manager, "But in fact, when we look at our database of actual learning curves across many programs, you see quite a wide variation."

"It really depends upon the automation, the maturity of that automation the complexity of the structure being put together, the quality and the experience of workforce and the training of the workforce.

"It's hard to draw conclusions about what you would expect on 787 from that number," he adds.

In areas that have seen very little traveled work and not had a lot of design changes, Fancher says, "our productivity and quality numbers are better than our projections, we're very pleased the way that aspect is coming together."

When asked if those areas were exceeding the 85% textbook curve, Fancher would only say "They're doing better than our projections" without offering specifics.

UBS Research analyst, David Strauss, said in a June report that estimated the 777's learning curve to be approximately 84%, ahead of the industry average.

"Our analysis indicates that Boeing is assuming much faster learning on 787 than it was able to achieve on 777 despite having less control of production this time," says Strauss, who estimates that each 787 costs approximately $250 to 300 million.

Based on Boeing's disclosure that it expects its per aircraft cost to fall below the program's averaged cost as it hits its production rate of 10 per month at the end of 2014, the 787 production system must achieve a 24% learning curve, nearly 50% higher than 777.

If Boeing achieves a learning curve comparable to the 777 "we see 787 burning $4 billion in cash on average annually through 2015," he adds. 

The Final Weeks

Boeing is anticipating completion of 787 extended operations (ETOPS) and systems functionality and reliability (F&R) testing by the close of July, following Airplane Nine's remote deployment to Guam, which is underway.

Company sources expect final documentation is expected to be handed over to the US Federal Aviation early to mid August with an approximately 30 day review period to follow culminating in awarding of the 787's type certificate in early September.

The handover of Airplane Eight is expected around the third week of September, with Airplane 24 to follow closely after, the subsequent airframes at Boeing ATS - are advancing, but not at the pace needed to make room allowing for the 12 to 20 787 deliveries the company forecast earlier this year.

According to Leeham Co, Boeing guidance is expected to be closer to eight or nine 787s delivered in 2011.

The first 787 for launch customer All Nippon Airways will enter revenue service in October connecting a charter route between Tokyo-Narita International Airport and Hong Kong's Chek Lap Kok Airport.

Second Photo Credit Boeing
I'll be the first to admit this is not your typical Movie Monday, even though it runs more than an hour. For the past several years, Precision Manuals Design Group, also known as PMDG, has been at work creating the world's most extensive desktop simulation of the Next Generation Boeing 737 for Microsoft Flight Simulator X. Final pricing and release dates are not yet available, but with its release to beta status the project is finally nearing completion.

UPDATE: PMDG announced this morning that software will be release on or before August 4.

The project, known as the NGX, has been developed as a product officially licensed by Boeing and has spared no detail, both visually and technically. One of the company's beta testers, Angle of Attack, has created a fly-through of the 737's virtual cockpit, highlighting the nearly uncountable number of features built in to the simulation. The AoA video is available in HD to really show off the level of depth and detail designed into the simulation. I would challenge 737 pilots, Boeing engineers and maintenance personnel to find things that might be missing, but I have a feeling you might be hard-pressed to do so.

AoA also created a considerably shorter walk-around of the external model, though if you're looking to get up close with the 737, Boeing's own gigapixel walk-around of a United Airlines 737-900ER with the updated CFM56-7BE engine and drag clean up is well worth your time.

100_1729

I had an opportunity this afternoon to record a podcast with AirInsight's Addison Schonland, Ken Herbert of Wedbush Securities and Michel Merluzeau at G2Solutions to discuss Wednesday's American Airlines mega-order and its impact on Boeing and Airbus, including the reaction of Boeing's most-loyal narrowbody customers to the timing of the decision to re-engine the 737 with CFM Leap-X engines.
 
American Airlines Boeing 737-800 N905AN

460: Total firm aircraft ordered by American Airlines, a record for commercial aviation, with 260 for Airbus and 200 for Boeing.

27: Days it took the previous record holder for largest aircraft order to fall, held by Air Asia for its 200 aircraft A320neo deal signed at the Paris Air Show on June 23.

100: Firm Next Generation Boeing 737 aircraft ordered, plus 40 options.

100: Firm re-engined Boeing 737s aircraft ordered, plus options for 60 more.

130: Firm current generation A320 family aircraft ordered.

130: Firm A320neo family aircraft ordered.

365: Options and purchase rights provided to American for Airbus aircraft.

13,000,000,000: The number of dollars committed by Airbus and Boeing to finance the first 230 deliveries to American.

286,000,000: The number of dollars lost by American in the second quarter of 2011.

0: The number of lessors outside of Boeing and Airbus identified that will lease the first 230 aircraft to American.

2013: When the aircraft deliveries begin to American Airlines, stretching to 2022.

5: The number of years it will take American to have the youngest and most-fuel efficient fleet in the US.

2016 or 2017: The possible entry into service years for the re-engined 737.

2017: The year American receives it first A320neo family aircraft.

2018: The year American receives its first re-engined 737.

3 or 4: The number of weeks before Boeing picks a fan diameter to firm to the re-engined 737's configuration.

17: The inches Boeing needs to maintain underneath the re-engined 737's nacelle as to not collide with taxiway lighting.

61: The inches in the fan diameter of the CFM56-7BE that powers today's Next Generation 737.

63 67: The maximum number of inches in the Leap-X fan diameter that will require no change to the 737's main landing gear.

70: The inches in one potential Leap-X fan the company is evaluating for the re-engined 737.

8: The inches the 737's nose gear needs to be lengthened to carry a 70in fan to achieve 12-15% improvement in fuel burn.

78: The inches in the fan diameter of the Leap-X1A that will power American's A320neo.

920: The number of engines CFM will need supply to American Airlines between 2013 and 2022, split between 260 Leap-X1A, 200 Leap-X1B, 260 CFM56-5B and 200 CFM56-7BE.

1259: The number of orders and commitments Airbus has earned for A320neo family aircraft since launch in December 2010.

2109: The number of remaining Next Generation 737s in Boeing's backlog, selling out the company's narrowbody production line through 2016.

42: The narrowbody production rate Airbus will reach in second quarter 2012 and the rate Boeing will achieve in the first half of 2014.

3518: Aircraft forecast by Boeing to be needed in North America between 2011 and 2030 to replace today's aging narrowbody fleets.
Photo of Note: The central question of re-engining the Boeing 737
AA-737NEO_800.jpgAA-A320_neo.jpg
UPDATE 8:56 AM CT: Central to Boeing moving forward in developing this new 737 variant is Boeing's own tendency to make too much change all at once. Boeing's Jim Albaugh discussed this over a year ago, and the phase "requirements creep" us going to be one you'll be hearing a lot about in the coming months.



Also, this order is a big win for Renton, Washington, which in recent months saw the evaluations of the new single aisle (NSA) and wondered whether or not it would play a roll in building what came next for Boeing's single aisle offering. 

UPDATE 6:53 AM CT: Strong indication now coming from the airframers that narrowbody production rate increases as a result of this deal are likely. 

Boeing says that the re-engined 737 - a product currently in its conceptual phase - will likely be launched by the Boeing Board of Directors sometime this fall, placing the formal authority to offer the aircraft sometime between late September and late December.

UPDATE 6:37 AM CT: AMR said it will "benefit from approximately $13 billion of committed financing from the manufacturers through lease transactions" to reduce risk and covers the first 230 aircraft. 

Deliveries will begin in 2013 and run through 2022, with American Airlines anticipating it have the youngest US fleet within five years. 

Of the 260 Airbus aircraft, 100 will be for current generation A320 family aircraft, with 160 more A320neos beginning in 2017, plus an additional 365 options and purchase rights. 

American Airlines leadership will hold a 7:30 AM CT conference call on the massive order, followed by a 10 AM CT press conference with Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Jim Albaugh and Airbus CEO Tom Enders.

6:01 AM CT: AMR, parent corporation of American Airlines, has placed an order for 460 aircraft, including 260 Airbus A320s and 100 Next Generation Boeing 737 and 100 yet-to-be-launched re-engined 737s, powered by CFM Leap-X engines.

The agreement with Boeing is for up to 300 aircraft, with the addition of 40 options on current model 737s and 60 options on the re-engined model.

This is a breaking story and will be updated. 

Second Photo Credit Airbus 
A320 production line_560.jpg
DALLAS -- While the hours count down to a final early morning board meeting of AMR corp, parent company of American Airlines, industry sources briefed on Airbus's North America strategy say the sales play by the European airframer is the opening salvo of the coming fleet replacement battles with US airlines that may eventually push Airbus production to record rates as high 60 A320 family aircraft per month after 2016 to meet the replacement demand. 

The announcement, now expected in Wednesday's early morning hours, is to split some portion of a 300 to 400 aircraft order between rivals Boeing and Airbus, with suggestions the number could rise even higher.

Industry analyst consensus, as well as prevailing wisdom inside Boeing concludes that the European airframer cannot achieve 60 A320s per month without major expansions of its Toulouse, Hamburg or Tianjin, China lines and opens the door to a US based final assembly line in Mobile, Alabama, current site of an Airbus engineering center sometime late in the decade to meet the replacement demand in North America, while its other lines are devoted to meeting growth demand in the rest of the world.

The strategy assumes at least a partial win with American Airlines by Airbus, delivering A321neos to replace the aging fleet of 757s, which serve as the workhorse of the carrier's fleet. And more broadly a supply chain that can handle the record rates.

Key to Airbus sales strategy is the commoditization of narrowbody travel in the US, guiding consumers selecting travel based on the fare price rather than differentiated product that can be leveraged for a higher price tag.

Wielding a nearly 25% improvement in seat mile costs, according to an AirInsight report comparing the A321neo to the 757, American Airlines would gain a significant upper hand in crowded and price sensitive markets.

The result Airbus is banking on is American's legacy US competitors, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and US Airways, all following suit with major orders to secure delivery positions to replace their own aging fleets of 737 Classics, MD-80s and 757s with A320neos.

Airbus was aiming to capitalize on Boeing's perceived indecisiveness on the future of the 737, though news of a re-engined 737, or at least some version of it, offered to American Airlines may stave off a mass exodus of customers to the A320neo, say those familiar with the European airframer's thinking.

Though a split but, say industry watchers, allows American to compete Boeing and Airbus on an airframe by airframe basis, forcing both to trade margins for marketshare.

Mobile Rising

When it first bid on the US Air Force KC-X tanker contract, Airbus and then-partner Northrop Grumman said it would establish an A330/KC-45A final assembly line in Mobile, Alabama after the initial test articles were produced in Toulouse.

To reduce its risk further, Airbus was to build A330-200 freighters in Mobile as well, providing the airframer an expansion of its industrial footprint at Boeing's doorstep, as well as providing its business access to non-Euro Zone based production costs.

Boeing was able to block that foothold at the end of the protracted and winding tanker competition, with its KC-X win that will see it build the Air Force's new KC-46A, though the Air Force now says the cost of the project is now forecast to be a billion dollars higher than the company's winning bid.

Though despite its victory in the strategic deal, Airbus may look to Mobile to build A320neos to serve the demands of US fleets.

The European airframer has been expanding its footprint in the US with approximately 200 engineering jobs at the Mobile facility focusing on cabin engineering for its widebody aircraft, says Airbus.

While Japanese car-maker Toyota built its first Kentucky plants in 1988 because of import tariffs intended to protect US car makers on their home turf, Airbus faces no such barrier with the Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft (ATCA), says Teal Group vice president of analysis Richard Aboulafia, which has afforded equal market access to Airbus and Boeing onto the opposition's home turf.

Though the Toyota comparison may be even more apt, fitting within Piepenbrock's Red-Blue, steadily advancing production rates in worldwide markets, incrementally advancing production rather than leaping forward, only to cut production later.

Airbus CEO Tom Enders said July 15, the airframer was looking into additional production rate increases on the A320 family, examining the capability of suppliers to meet the anticipated demand for the A320neo production ramp up, adding that increases would be "in notches" and "not big jumps."

Narrowbody production is set to reach 42 aircraft per month by the fourth quarter of 2012, with increases to 44 being explored, which follows increases from 18 to 22 A320 family aircraft at the turn of the decade to a near doubling today, all incrementally increased over the past ten years.

As it heads to a rate of 42 narrowbody 737s per month by the first half of 2014, Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Jim Albaugh said last week that his company was distantly exploring what it would take to build 60 competing 737s per month, echoing a sentiment reflected in Airbus own strategy: "It'll be a while before we go that high, but I tell you what if they can build them I think we can sell them."

Photo Credit Airbus
American Airlines Boeing 757-200 N7667A

American Airlines is expected to purchase an undisclosed number of aircraft on Wednedsay, splitting the order between Airbus and Boeing, industry sources tell FlightBlogger. 
American Airlines Boeing 737-800 N905AN

American Airlines will announce Wednesday a purchase of commercial aircraft, ending a month of speculation since the Paris Air Show about the timing of the order, which could be for more than 250 single-aisle aircraft, an industry source confirms. The breakdown of the order between Boeing and Airbus, however, remains unknown.
Continuing in the theme of Movie Mondays devoted to space exploration, this week's edition takes you on-board the Space Shuttle Atlantis and more specifically outside for the Shuttle Program's final spacewalk last week. Today's Movie Monday is the STS-135 flight day five highlights running just shy of 40 minutes and inclues a recap of the final 6h 31min extravehicular activity (EVA) by International Space Station expedition crew members Mike Fossum and Ron Garan. Enjoy!
 
Boeing 787 Dreamliner N787EX ZA002

Boeing is laser sharp when it comes to its use of language, especially in press releases. As ZA002 completes its time in Japan for Service Ready Operational Validation, the company's line on 787 first delivery has changed in a subtle, but important, way. When the company first announced in May it planned to take ZA002 to Japan it narrowed its handover of the first 787 for All Nippon Airways to August or September, that target is now identified as "later this year."

The official Boeing Commercial Airplanes Twitter account responded: "No change to our current plan to deliver the 1st Boeing 787 Dreamliner in August or September timeframe. FYI @flightblogger #787EIS #Boeing"

The progression of announcements is as follows.

May 26, 2011
Boeing plans to deliver the first 787 to ANA in the August to September timeframe.
June 21, 2011
Launch customer ANA is expected to take delivery of the first 787 in August or September.
June 27, 2011

"We are ready for this final phase of flight testing," said Scott Fancher, vice president and general manager of the 787 program. "The team has created a solid plan for accomplishing the hours and test points required for F&R and ETOPS testing in support of delivery to our customer ANA in the August to September time period."
July 4, 2011
Boeing plans to deliver the first 787 to ANA in the August to September timeframe.
July 12, 2011
ANA's first scheduled service with the 787 will be either the Tokyo Haneda-Okayama or Tokyo Haneda-Hiroshima route when deliveries begin later this year.
Either Boeing has decided to add a bit of variety to its wording for 787 first delivery or there is ground work being laid for a delivery after September.

I hope it's the former.
Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner ZA260

Boeing has instituted an approximately one-month hold on the 787 final assembly line and a halt in structural deliveries to its Everett factory due to supplier part "spot shortages" and "remaining engineering changes", the company confirms, another in a series of halting stops and starts as the production system works to get beyond two aircraft per month.

While the company will not comment on any impact to downstream deliveries, Boeing plans to update to its 2011 delivery guidance on during its July 27 second quarter earnings call.

The hold leaves unaffected the August or September first 787 delivery to All Nippon Airways and the company maintains its short and long-term plans to ramp the 787 production line remain unchanged, with plans to advance from two to 2.5 aircraft per month later this summer and 10 per month by the end of 2013.

The line was supposed to have advanced forward during the first week of July, but instead began a 20-manufacturing day hold which is expected to last until the first week of August, says Boeing, which adds that production continues on all aircraft.

A typical monthly manufacturing calendar includes 21 days.

This is the company's first 787 line hold in 2011, following four holds in 2010 due to Alenia Aeronautica-built horizontal stabilizer workmanship issues, part shortages and engineering change incorporation.

Airplanes 40, 41, 42 and 43 are currently occupying the four assembly stations inside the Everett factory's 40-26 building, with a full complement of aircraft structures for Airplane 44 at position zero, and wings and horizontal stabilizer for Airplane 45, the first 787 for United Airlines now in the factory.

Boeing would not say whether or not it anticipated an upward or downward revision to its 2011 787 delivery guidance, which currently calls for 12 to 20 of the new jets to be in the hands of customers by the end of the year, though customers are already experiencing delays to 2012 deliveries.

Ethiopian Airlines regional director for China, Fikre Degife, told the Wall Street Journal the carrier now expected its first 787 in March 2012, a slip of three months from its previous expectation of January. Airplane 44, now holding in place inside the factory, is the second built for the East African carrier and Boeing has not been specified which airframe will be handed over first.

United Airlines CEO Jeff Smisek said Saturday the carrier expects to "proudly take delivery of [its first 787] early next year, we hope."

The US carrier will deploy the 228-seat twin-jet on its inaugural Houston to Auckland, New Zealand route, requiring the aircraft to have 330 minutes extended operations certification, which is not expected to be available until just before the aircraft's delivery.

Further, the company's new South Carolina facility is in the early stages of beginning work on Airplane 46, the first 787 to be built outside of Washington state. Final assembly operations are expected to formally begin later this week, with forward fuselage delivery from Spirit AeroSystems anticipated during the third week of July.
As a docked Atlantis orbits overhead with the International Space Station, I felt it only appropriate to delve into the YouTube aviation archive once again and pull out vintage NASA footage from STS-1, the first mission by Space Shuttle Columbia that began on April 12, 1981. Flown by astronauts John Young and Robert Crippen, the mission was a two-day checkout flight of the spacecraft. 

Today's Movie Monday takes you to the April 1981 coverage of Columbia's first liftoff and and landing as reported by NBC and ABC News. Rather than embed each of the 27 parts below, the players is in a playlist format that allows you to step from one part to another. The news coverage of STS-1, as well as a 30-minute NASA documentary of the flight runs a whopping 4 hours and 30 minutes. Enjoy.



Photo of Note: The Lights of Atlantis

SOMEWHERE ON THE ROAD TO KENNEDY SPACE CENTER -- As the dateline would suggest, I'm in transit. In what has become a series of lines, that lead to more lines, I am on a bus bound for Kennedy Space Center Visitor Center - another in a series of stops - that will eventually take me to the causeway that sits about 4 miles from Pad 39A, currently hosting a Space Shuttle for the final time.

OV-104, more commonly known as Space Shuttle Atlantis, began fueling a little past 2:00 AM here in Florida, but weather - not technical readiness - appear to be the big obstacles to an on-time launch at 11:26 AM ET. NASA gives the launch about a 30% chance of taking place with a chance of thunderstorms in the area. As a baseball fan .300 are odds I'll take. Much of this day, I suspect, will be spent playing the waiting game.

So there's no confusion, my beat remains commercial aircraft, and my business here in Florida is separate from any official Flightglobal coverage, but seeing an opportunity to see a shuttle launch in person, I seized it, which is not to say I wasn't going to write something about the goings-on here at the cape.

More from Florida to follow as the morning rolls on, but it's just shy of 3 AM now, and I'm going to try and briefly add to the 90 minutes of sleep I got "last night" while I still have the chance. JO, out.

ANA-787-SH-Biz_560.jpg
With ZA002 bouncing between airports in Japan this week, 787 has been on display for the aircraft's Service Ready Operational Validation (SROV). While the external paint matches that of the 787's launch customer, All Nippon Airways, the interior could not be more dissimilar. 

As a test aircraft, ZA002's interior is stocked with racks of instrumentation and bare insulation sidewalls, not the stylized interior that Boeing offers with each 787.

The first 787 that will be delivered to ANA, ZA101, Airplane Eight, is currently parked at Factory South undergoing change incorporation and cabin outfitting. When it is handed over to All Nippon Airways in August or September it will not immediately enter service as the carrier waits for the formal regulatory sign-off from the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau to begin passenger operations.

When it does begin revenue operations, the 787 is expected to remain on domestic operations to begin its life with ANA for pilot training before stretching its legs to regional destinations. The airline announced this past weekend it had narrowed its choices for the first 787 route to two cities from Tokyo's Haneda International Airport: Hiroshima or Okayama

ANA's fifth 787 will be its first to fly on long routes from Japan, and will be configured with around 200 seats in a two-class configuration with its staggered business (1-2-1 and 1-1-1), a configuration it unveiled at the Paris Air Show along with the special paint scheme for its first two aircraft.

The first four 787s delivered, thought to be Airplanes Seven, Eight, Nine and 24 will feature a two-class cabin configured for the short to medium-haul missions. However, ANA has not officially unveiled the cabin details for its medium to short-haul 787s, footage published at ZA002's arrival at Haneda this past weekend provided the first look inside the aircraft. The same footage can be seen on the airline's Made with Japan promotional film (interior at :47) on the airline's youtube channel.



A bit of digging revealed that ANA has selected Sicma AIRgonomic FX seating for its economy seats, laid out at eight-abreast in a 2-4-2 arrangement. Like its 777-300ERs, ANA appears to have opted for a 24-seat mini-economy cabin ahead of the door two LED archway on the short-haul configuration and behind a second zone of staggered business seating for the long-haul arrangement. Also at the archway appears to be a counter-height bar unit, presumably for economy passengers.

ANA-787-SH-Bar_560.jpg
ANA Sicma Majesty 1.jpgANA-787-SH-Y_560.jpg
The only notable difference between the long-range and short-range economy cabins appear to be a smaller seat pitch (34" on long-haul), 9in IFE (10.6in on long-haul) screen that doesn't include a Panasonic eXport iPod jack. Up front, ANA has chosen a 2-2-2 arrangement with Sicma Majesty up front in its regional business class configuration. 

After the jump you'll find three videos from Boeing and ANA which give you a look inside ZA002's cabin on its flight to Japan, and most notably for those who love the view out the window, a look at the 787's wing flex at takeoff and cruise. The videos also include progress reports on the SROV missions at Haneda, as well as the 14 minute raw video of ZA002's arrival in Tokyo.
Bombardier Aerospace announced today that one of its own, James Hoblyn, passed away on July 3. Hoblyn served as President, Bombardier Customer Services & Specialized and Amphibious Aircraft.

I first met James last year on my way to EBACE in Geneva. My colleague John Croft and I joined a small group of journalists and staff from Bombardier aboard a Global 5000 aircraft for the trans-Atlantic flight. We were all very much awake for the day-time crossing and had a lot of time to talk with one another. His warmth and enthusiasm for work and his love for his family was immediately apparent. During the downtime before he held on-the-record court in the jet's mid-cabin, we talked tech and cars. Weeks earlier he had gotten a Mini Cooper, which he joked his teenage daughter wasn't allowed anywhere near.

James had an affinity for technology and got a real kick out of the fact that I was live-tweeting and blogging the crossing on my iPad somewhere between two continents. He was a proponent of social media inside Bombardier, using his own internal blog, called The James Exchange - which he wrote himself - to connect with his employees, solicit feedback and cultivate dialogue. 

This industry spends much time discussing how social media is used outwardly, but James found a way to harness its power inside of Bombardier to nurture transparency and openness amongst his staff. Every time I would see him he would let me know how his experiment was going. Today, James' Blog had 10,000 visitors from inside Bombardier and more than 120 comments have been left in remembrance. Bombardier Aerospace has 30,000 employees.

For conservative companies, such experiments can often backfire, but James was excited at the possibilities his blog held to build a more effective team. Whether he knew it or not, James Hoblyn was a pioneer in advancing corporate transparency.

James is survived by his wife Josée and their three daughters. He was 46.
Paris Air Show 2011 Header

DSC_2922

The second in a two part Paris Air Show news analysis exploring the strategic questions facing Boeing and its decision about the future of the 737. This analysis builds on the discussion of tactical decisions facing Boeing as it develops the technology for the new conceptual jet. READ PART ONE
PARIS -- Amid the temporary chalets, noisy press conferences and overcrowded flight line, the Paris Air Show featured a traditional straw poll of sorts. Boeing's stalwart narrowbody customers quietly - and some not so quietly - cast their vote in favor of a New Small Airplane.

As the ink dried on a purchase agreement for 15 more 737-800s, Norwegian Air Shuttle CEO Bjorn Kjos told a room of journalists he was "lining up in the queue to tell Boeing to build a new aircraft" and was urging Boeing it was time to take "the next giant leap."

Steven Udvar-Hazy employed the pages of the Seattle Times to send his message: "We're ready to sit down (with Boeing) and make a deal on a new airplane, that's how strongly we feel."

Contemplating a 200 aircraft order from China's Comac, Morgan Stanley industry analyst Heidi Wood called Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary's actions as "dual-pronged" with a loud message to Boeing's Chicago headquarters: "Notice served; Ryanair wants a new plane."

Even all-Boeing operator American Airlines pursuit of the A321neo to replace its 757s, as reported by Bloomberg News, was the carrier's way of saying the Next Generation 737 isn't enough. The story shot a bolt of panic through Seattle as its "cannot lose" customers cast their vote one by one.

The message is far from subtle, Boeing's customers want an all-new airplane, yet the decision, by "market-driven" Boeing, isn't so simple.

Paris demonstrated the A320neo accomplished one clear feat - Airbus found an effective means to lock in its customer base for another decade, despite the protests of lessors. In the first six months of 2011, Airbus has earned 668 firm orders for the A320neo, more than the total combined net orders for 2009 and 2010. 

Boeing's math may tell it today's 737 is still 2% more cost effective to operate than the A320neo, yet that 2% disadvantage still compelled Airbus customers to make big investments in the re-engined jet, which touts a 15% improvement in fuel burn over today's A320.

A clean-sheet New Small Airplane would be a complete break from today's 737, unencumbered by commonality in both parts and pilot type rating, and by its very definition would unlock Boeing's 737 customer base to disregard switching costs between types as it considered the A320neo against the NSA.

Would the relatively low cost investment by Airbus to develop the the A320neo to provide a 15% improvement in fuel burn give the European airframer the ability to use selling price to flip Boeing customers who have been unlocked from the 737NG? Is this a recipe for loss of market share?

"If we did a new small airplane," insists Nicole Piasecki, Boeing business development vice president, "We would not do a plan that has us losing market share. We would have a plan that would have us gaining market share. That means that we have to understand with confidence how to keep our exising customer base and grow it.

"And that means, again the NG is going to stay in production for a long period of time and that family is competitive as possible as well. So we will not abandon the NG at the same time we are going through the transition," emphasizing the 737+ developments for the next tranche of incremental improvements to the narrowbody, will provide a technological bridge to a New Single Aisle.

Though, Boeing Commercial Airplanes CEO Jim Albaugh is unapologetic about the price tag of its narrowbody: "Our view is the 737 should command a higher price and we charge a higher price because of the capability it provides," adding that a re-engined 737 or an all-new airplane would be no different.

Piepenbrock's Red-Blue suggests mature markets are battlefields for cost competition. Whether Boeing likes it or not Airbus is playing a cost game while Boeing is playing a value game, prompting price sensitive airlines and lessors to invariably weigh the value of efficiency and fuel burn if its delivered up front as as price cut.
  Boeing 787 Dreamliner N787BA ZA001

The Dreamliner Constraint

Though inextricably, the path to the New Small Airplane runs through Everett, Charleston, Wichita, Nagoya, Grottaglie, Foggia, Frederickson and Salt Lake City. To pay for a massive new development program - its design and its industrialization - Boeing must make its current clean sheet 787 profitable, before it sets out on the next.

Both UBS Investment Research and Bernstein Research have recently published a reports raising questions about the pace of achieving profitability on 787, recognizing the contractually established supplier costs coupled with the low locked-in aircraft sale price over more than 800 aircraft.

UBS's David Strauss predicts "flat to progressively worse 787 cash flow over the next several years" as the production system comes down the learning curve, coupled with prices that make 787, says Berstein's Doug Harned a "victim of its own success. With 787 production sold out until 2019, pricing is largely fixed at prices we believe were set too low in the beginning."

This page's own reporting reflects this trend, with an average airframe sale price of $76 million, locked in on at least the first 300 aircraft, a conservative estimate that has not taken into account return buying by the early tranche of customers.

"At this point in time our product development investment decision we are assuming success and progress and momentum on all of that so we're not constraining our thinking around that," says Piasecki.

"But as you and I can imagine, if we're a board member and the company isn't executing on what it needs to, there are going to be some questions around it. We have to be accountable for getting to profitability on the 87 and the 47-8, no question about it, top priority."

As Boeing brings into focus the considerations around the cost of making another big leap, the benefits of incrementally improving the 737, weighed against the development requirements for the 787-9 and -10X, as well as crafting a more comprehensive competitive response to the A350 in the 777-8X and -9X, the constrained path forward may point to re-engining the 737.

"There are tradeoffs, I think the re-engine is a very, very attractive option," says Piasecki. "From a perspective, if you're looking for minimal disruption to the industry, maximum flexibility to make a move on the 777, and those are all the sorts of things that we're thinking about as we move through this decision."

Boeing last deliberation about replacing the 737 Classic with an all-new jet came in the early 90s, in the midst of a constrained environment that focused the organization's attention toward the development of the clean sheet 777. Out of those constraints the Next Generation 737 was born.

The result, an incremental development strategy that considerably grew the capability of the 737 family, has yielded 3,700 deliveries, a 6% improvement in efficiency since 1997's first delivery and has brought the company great riches, high production rates and arguably the leanest, most productive supply chain in all of aerospace, that seamlessly joins together a quarter million parts 31.5 times every month.

As it looks down the road to an all-new narrowbody and its all-new production system, then back at its stalwart best-selling product, Boeing is again a company at a crossroads.

Cookies & Privacy