Archives

March 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

January 2012 Archives

Building on last Friday's post about unlocking customers to evaluate competing airframer's products, I wanted to look a bit closer at the changes Airbus and Boeing made to develop their respective second generation 777s and A340s. For Boeing, the aircraft maker would evolve the 777-200ER and -300 into the the 777-300ER, -200LR and freighter, while Airbus would take its A340-300 and -200 to become the A340-600 and -500. 

I went digging into the Flight International archive to find the technical evolution of each model and the structural changes that were required from their respective baseline designs. The changes to create the longer range A340s were significantly more extensive with its stretched wingbox, fuselage and revised empennage

With its raised main landing gear, raked wingtip extensions and structural strengthening, the 777, by comparison did not need a fuselage stretch as the original 777-200 and -300 established the airframes for the -200LR and -300ER.

October 1996 - A340-500/600 soft launch
1996-October-A340.jpg
March 1997 - 777-200X/300X launch
1997-March-777.jpg
Additional details of the 777 and A340's evolution are below the fold.
NAS-737-Max-Winglet_560.jpg
To date, Airbus and Boeing have split three of the five announced 737 Max customers: American Airlines, Aviation Capital Group and now Norwegian Air Shuttle.
 
Norwegian's order for 100 737-8s is a big boost for the re-engined jet as it grows its firm backlog and hardly a surprise as the northern European airline is one of Boeing's stalwart narrowbody customers. Though accompanying that order were 100 more Airbus A320neos.

Fundamentally the "minimum change" Max is a derivative development from today's Next Generation 737, just as the Next Generation family was a derivative of the 737 Classic. With 75% non-commonality, the 737-600, -700, -800 and -900 unlocked the Classic's customers to consider the A320. 

The consequence of Boeing's changes to the 737; a new tail cone, widespread structural re-gauging, engine development and a raised nose gear make the Max a manageable, yet expensive (which Boeing disputes), undertaking, concluded Bernstein Research in a report earlier this week. But the result, as illustrated by Norwegian's A320neo order, may also be an unlocked 737 market for Airbus and Boeing to fight over.

Photo Credit Boeing & Airbus
AA-777-300ER-Archway.jpg
With its 1,000th unit coming down the line for Emirates, Boeing's 777 continues to evolve from its earliest incarnations. The latest interior catalog offerings, now selected by American Airlines, include a 787 and 737-style Sky Interior LED-lit entryway for its 777-300ERs, which enter the fleet in December. Long-time Boeing interior design firm Teague was believed to have been working on this feature for a while now.

The features of its 777 were hinted about last year when, just days after its bankruptcy filing, the carrier announced what would be aboard its new twin. 
Arranged in a three-class cabin configuration, the new 777-300ER will provide the airline with more passenger and cargo capacity than any other aircraft in its fleet today. Customers will be welcomed into the aircraft by unique mood lighting. American will be the first carrier to use a dramatic archway and ceiling treatment on the 777-300 to create a feeling of spaciousness.
At that point, American's news release did not include any images or additional details about the interior. Whether the Sky Interior-inspired lighting will run the length of the 777 isn't clear from the photos release by the airline. Further, the carrier appears to be an early customer for the formerly branded Panasonic Fusion in-flight entertainment system, now known as the Integrated Smart Monitor, a photo of which is below the fold.

Additional photos of its business and first class seating are available on American's Facebook page.

UPDATE 3:46 PM ET: While Boeing and American have focused on upgrades to evolve the 777's interior, the company has been finding ways to improve the environmental efficiency of building and delivering each aircraft. While environmental efficiency is the banner under which 10 improvements have been made to the manufacturing process, the bottom line is how to reduce the cost to build each 777 through continuously improving and optimizing its processes.


Photo Credit American Airlines
Royal Air Maroc Boeing 787 Dreamliner ZA151

As we approach Wendesday's Boeing full year 2011 and quarterly earnings report, which is sure to be filled with questions of the pace of 787 and 747-8 deliveries and production ramp up, the burden of travelled work and change incorporation has been the central theme of aircraft development over the past decade. 

I've recently started reading a new book called Smart Trust, by Stephen Covey and Greg Link, recommended to me by a colleague. It explores the role of trust in creating a prosperous, more energetic and happier organization, whether in microfinance in developing nations, the actions of governments and its citizenry or the relationships between customers and suppliers. 

I'm still early on in the book, but one quote jumped out at me. While it wasn't referring specifically to aerospace and aircraft development, this paragraph captured the connection directly:
When trust goes down in a relationship, on a team, in an organization, or in a country, speed goes down and cost goes up. Why? Because of the many steps that have to be taken to compensate for the lack of trust. This is a tax-a low-trust tax. Everything takes more time, and miscommunication, redundancy, and rework create costly delays.
To look at the recent history of Airbus A380's wiring woes, the 787's supply chain, the lessons of both are seen in the A350 and CSeries programs, both working to position themselves to avoid similar pains. But was the prevalence of traveled work the root cause of the delays to these aircraft programs or just a symptom of something much deeper both between customer and supplier and within an organization?
BA-Privatair-CS100-Crop_560.jpg
As part of its PrivatAir CSeries CS100 order announced yesterday, Bombardier provided a significant allusion to one of its unannounced customers.
"Included among the 11 customers that have selected the CSeries aircraft are major network carriers, national carriers, premium airlines serving city centre airports, a low-cost airline, leasing companies and now, with the order from PrivatAir announced today, a full service provider to airline partners," said Philippe Poutissou, Vice President, Marketing, Bombardier Commercial Aircraft. 
The orders are indicated as follows: Firm orders for Republic Airways, Lufthansa, Lease Corporation International, Korean Air, Braathens Aviation, an unidentified major network carrier, an unidentified European customer, a well-established, unidentified airline, and letters of intent from Atlasjet and Ilyushin Finance.

With PrivatAir specifically not included in its list of operator descriptions above, Bombardier appears to be tipping its hand about its prospects for already having secured a premium configured CSeries operating out of a city center airport, like that of London City, which sounds an awful lot like the rumoured Odyssey Airlines.

Photo Credit Bombardier
At yesterday's Airbus Training Center event, professionalism and transportation safety kept coming up as a topic of conversation and how it remains the centerpiece for maintaining the integrity of global transit. While it wasn't mentioned explicitly, these were the two pictures that kept coming to mind.

Submitted without further comment.

1459-Concordia.jpg
Lufthansa Boeing 747-8I D-ABYE/N6067U RC021

Its first delivery of the 747-8 Intercontinental internally slated for February, Boeing is locking out the tail fuel tanks of its new jumbo after a structural flutter was found to occur in the event of a certain structural fitting failure. FULL STORY
"Boeing certified the 747-8 Intercontinental with the tail fuel tanks locked out because during design review of flight test data...it was discovered that, under a certain regulatory-required structural failure scenario, the airplane can experience flutter events when the fuel tanks in the horizontal stabiliser are filled over 15% of their capacity," said Boeing.

To comply with US Federal Aviation Administration regulations, Boeing will deactivate the tail fuel system to satisfy the requirement that no structural flutter be present in the airframe after any single failure condition.

"These conditions do not present themselves when the tanks are empty," Boeing said of the structural failure evaluations, which were only found to occur if the aircraft's wing-to-strut join fitting had failed.

The "requirement for all key structural fittings...need to have a design tolerant of 'any single failure'", said Boeing. "We're actively working on ways to activate the fuel tanks for the long term."
The lock-out will be achieved through the pulling of a circuit breaker and the physical disconnection and capping of fuel lines running to the horizontal stabilizers' 3,300gal tanks.

Boeing says the restriction will shave 300-400nm off the range of the VIP configured 747-8 and will have little impact to the airline configured aircraft, as tail fuel usage is precluded if the non-fuel weight exceeds 60% of the aircraft's maximum structural payload. In such a situation, the fuel payload would be entirely carried by the wing tanks.

Boeing recently updated, then removed - pending review - its 747-8 and -8F maxiumum structural payload and operating empty weight (OEW) weights:
The document listed the maximum structural payload for the passenger configured model as 82.1t (181,000lb) and the pre-service bulletin for the 747-8F at 134t (295,200lb), which increased after April's update to 139t (306,000lb).
47-8 airline launch customer Lufthansa says, "For our mission profile it's not a problem at the moment," adding the tail fuel restriction would not restrict the aircraft's deployment on its initial routes, which have not yet been announced. 

"Of course you want an airplane that can run as long as possible" in unrestricted operation, it added.

MIAMI -- I'm here in Florida for the next two days for an Airbus simulator training that will explore the European airframer's digital fly-by-wire philosophy, which has oft been a point of discussion about the role of computers and the role of pilots in flying. 
For Airbus, fly-by-wire has resulted in hard limits on the aircraft flight envelope, preventing over-speeding, stalling, and over-banking of the aircraft. The maximum bank allowed is 67-deg, with nose-down pitch not exceeding 15-deg and a 2.5g limit. An auto-thrust system complements the A-floor protection by automatically spooling up the engines, limiting nose up pitch (angle of attack) to prevent the aircraft from stalling and providing best climb performance.
Those philosophical discussions, both of which diverge and converge amongst commercial aircraft manufacturers, have guided aircraft development for three decades now, with some implementation of fly-by-wire included on every single new aircraft in development. The systems have evolved from simply providing a flight control input all the way to being the basis for structural design through limiting loads on an airframe.

The video above shows the technology in action aboard an A320 family aircraft operating around South America in routine operation and presented in rather dramatic fashion. 
All Nippon Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner JA801A ZA101

Over the next two weeks, the 787 will add four new destinations, including its first international long-haul route, aided by a growing number of deliveries from Boeing.

The 787's first two and a half months in service have provided a light trial with a only four daily flights with two aircraft and a combined 325min of flying between the Haneda Airport in the Japanese capital and Hiroshima and Okayama. Those light operations have yielded a 96.3% dispatch reliability, compared to 96.5% for ANA's total operations. 

The only deviation of note during the first months of service was the November 6 incident in which the landing gear failed to deploy on the first attempt while on approach to Okayama.

As Boeing and ANA have closely tended to the first two 787s, the expansion of 787 services will provide the aircraft's first major test.

UPDATE 4:42 PM ET:PianoX performance analysis of the deployment the 787 on these regional routes indicates that the inherent nature of the aircraft's long-range configuration means ANA is far from yielding the benefits of Boeing's touted 20% improvement in fuel efficiency over the 767.
The B787-8 is used by ANA in domestic and regional service over distances of 300 to 1200 nm (HND-OKJ, HND-PEK). Such usage is ill-matched to intrinsic design-sizing considerations for this aircraft. For example, when carrying 25 tonnes over 1000 nm the B787-8 burns approximately 10.6 tonnes of fuel (and more for early deliveries with acknowledged performance shortfalls). In contrast, a B757-300W is better sized to carry the same payload over the same distance, burning merely 8.6 tonnes despite its senescence, albeit at economy-class comfort levels (no deterioration, best engine option). The B767-300ERW burns 10.3 tonnes under the same circumstances. The factual significance and operational reality of such (counter-expectational) mission-specific fuel burns can appear negated or reversed through contrived definitions of efficiency metrics based on point conditions. 
Further, the analysis suggests that on the coming long-range route to Frankfurt, ANA will only yield a 1.2% fuel burn advantage with the 787 compared to a new 767-300ER with winglets.

The coming expansion is aided by recent deliveries to the airline, including the December 30 handover of Airplane 31, the first 158-seat long-haul configured aircraft and the January 12 delivery of the fourth, Airplane 41. The fifth delivery, Airplane 9, likely taking place today, says a program source, will expand the 264-seat regionally configured fleet to four aircraft. 
The airline will begin its first international service between Haneda and Beijing on 14 January, followed by services on 17 and 18 January and its first long-haul flight between Tokyo Narita airport and Frankfurt, Germany on 21 January.

Domestic operations are set to expand on the Okayama and Hiroshima routes on 13 January, moving from one to two flights per day.

ANA will begin Haneda flights to Yamaguchi Ube and Itami (Osaka) from 23 January.

After the commencement of its 2012 fiscal year on 1 April, ANA will add Haneda to Matuyama and Narita to Seattle and San Jose, California.
The Beijing route will be initially operated with a international long-haul configuration on January 14, 17 and 18 before moving to the Frankfurt flight, which will be flown daily with 787 as of March 1, alternating between 777-200ER and 787 service from January 21 after delivery delays in November and December slowed the introduction.
First A350 XWB Section 15

Since September, structural parts for the first two A350-900s have traversed the Atlantic ocean and the European continent on their way through Airbus's most distributed commercial supply chain.

Monday, Spirit AeroSystems delivered its first center fuselage from its St. Nazaire, France facility to Airbus's facility pre-final assembly next door. The handover marked the first time on a new Airbus aircraft that a non-EADS company has supplied major structure for a first unit.

Following the build-up of parts and their transition from the airframer's wholly-owned and independent structural suppliers has at times been challenging, while understanding the sequencing of the aircraft's early production.

With the static test airframe, MSN5000, scheduled to be the first A350 to enter final assembly later this quarter, the first deliveries by Spirit, Aerolia and Premium Aerotec to Airbus were in fact MSN1, which will be the first A350-900 to fly. 

Airbus and Spirit confirmed yesterday that while the first forward fuselage section to arrive in Toulouse for final assembly was for MSN5000, as noted last month, that structure was delivered is actually the second to pass through the St. Nazaire site after the first deliveries of parts for MSN1. 

The reason, explained Airbus, is MSN1 will spend longer in pre-final assembly for systems installation and says MSN5000's passing the first A350 to fly on its way to Toulouse is "fully in accordance with the planning."

Flight deck structure (Section 11-12) from Aerolia was delivered in September, followed by transfer of the MSN1 center fuselage panels (Section 15) from Kinston, North Carolina to Spirit's St. Nazaire facility in October and the first forward barrel (Section 13-14) from Premium Aerotec in November to Hamburg for systems installation. This page incorrectly noted that those deliveries had been for MSN5000 and have since been corrected.

The second shipments from Aerolia and Premium Aerotec for MSN5000 were joined together in early December before the end of the month handover to Toulouse. The Premium Aerotec Section 13-14 for MSN5000 bypassed Hamburg for systems installation completely as they weren't required for the static airframe.

Spirit's second unit, MSN5000 or ES, has begun partial build up in St. Nazaire, the aerostructures manufacturer explains:
The Crown Panel, Left Lateral Panel and Right Lateral Panel (also known as the Upper Shell when assembled) for MSN5000 have been shipped to Spirit's St. Nazaire assembly center and is in work there. The Forward Lower Shell and Left and Right Lateral Junction Panels for MSN5000 are still in Kinston and will ship to our St. Nazaire facility later this month.
Tailcone.jpeg
Further, MSN1's Section 19, the A350's tail cone, was shipped in December from Getafe, Spain to Hamburg for build up with the Section 16-18 panels. That aft section's side panels and floor grids are fabricated by Premium Aerotec and shipped to EADS in Hamburg for integration, but it is not known if they have been delivered. 

Photos Credit Spirit AeroSystems & Airbus

I received word this morning of the passing of legendary Grumman test pilot Robert "Bob" Smyth. Smyth, 84, was responsible for an extraordinary contribution to civil and military aeronautics and astronautics.

After leaving the US Navy as a pilot in the Grumman F8F Bearcat, Vought F4U Corsair and McDonnell F2H Banshee and de Havilland 112 Venom, Smyth joined Grumman Aircraft Engineering in 1955. Smyth served as assistant project pilot of the Gulfstream I, consulting pilot and astronaut liaison to NASA on the Lunar Excursion Module during the Apollo program.

Smyth was at the controls for the first flights of the Grumman A2F (later the A-6A Intruder) and captured the experience in 2001, writing:
Now, the real purpose of a first flight is to make a successful landing. There is a tremendous level of interest at this point. Hundreds of people have worked long hours for months to reach this point; a large part of the company's future is tied to the airplane's success; and the customer is anxious to see what he's buying. All this creates a great deal of pressure on all concerned. One person has it within his power to bring instant relief to all hands: the lucky guy who gets to make the first flight.
His career spanned an extraordinary variety of aircraft, being the first to fly the Gullfstream II and as chief Grumman test pilot, flew the F-14A for the first time in 1970. Smyth left Grumman and joined Gulfstream Aerospace in 1981 and retired as vice president of flight operations in 1993.

Smyth spoke to the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum in 2007, discussing his incredible career and his indelible contribution to aerospace in the video above.

Smyth passed away yesterday at his home in Florida and is survived by his wife, Sally, and two sons, Robert and Andy.
Il76-static-Sator_560.jpeg
RosK-Factory-Sator_560.jpg
SSJ100-FAL-1-Dolya_560.jpg
SSJ100-FAL-2-Dolya_560.jpg Last week brought an odd re-occurring pattern of sorts: Different people, from very different places pointed me toward two different photographers who both captured the past and present of Russian aerospace in a series of extraordinarily detailed and artistically poignant photo essays. This page in the past has explored the immediate post-Soviet era in commercial air transport, though photographers Lana Sator and Sergey Dolya each have taken another step in telling that story, illustrating both the decay and fledgling rebirth of the country's aerospace industry.

Sator strolled effortlessly into a former Soviet Roscosmos missile factory and what appears to be a facility once used by Illuyshin for static testing, while Dolya explores - in extraordinary  detail - the process of fabricating and assembling the new Sukhoi Superjet in at the company's facilities in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Dolya, with the apparent permission of Sukhoi, brings to life the first metal cut for each aircraft all the way through final assembly to the flight line in what must be bordering on proprietary detail. In lieu of a moving Movie Monday, the 200 photos should occupy the eye for quite a while.

Photos Credit Lana Sator & Sergey Dolya
BA-CIASTA-Interior_900.jpg
"It'll fly when it's ready", as goes the perennial line from aerospace leaders about the maiden flight of new aircraft.

In a wide-ranging interview yesterday, Stephen Trimble and myself sat down with CSeries vice president and general manager Rob Dewar, covering what's ahead as the CS100, the aircraft maker's first clean sheet commercial aircraft design, pushes toward its goal of flying at the end of 2012 and entering service late next year with its undisclosed launch customer.

The margin for error is gone, acknowledged Commercial Aerospace president Guy Hachey, during October's National Business Aviation Association in Las Vegas, so hitting every note over the next 24 months is the path to meeting the schedule. Though CEO Pierre Beaudoin says a three to six month slip to the first half of 2014 falls within the realm of acceptable delays.

CIASTA - the Complete Integrated Aircraft Systems Test Area - Bombardier's "iron bird" began commissioning systems late in December, with its Aircraft 0 beginning tests on the pedestal, throttle quadrant and FADEC software. That activation is the first of many systems that will come to life inside CIASTA over the first quarter of this year. 

What makes CIASTA different from other "iron bird" systems integration rigs is Bombardier's emphasis on having every non-fuel system running inside the building. On one side of the facility, accounting for 90% of the aircraft's systems, is the hydraulics, avionics, electrics and primary flight controls, known as the Integrated Systems Test and Certification Rig (ISTCR). 

On the other, a complete cabin systems and Environmental Control System (ECS) demonstrator with pressurization, heating, cooling, lighting and cabin management systems, accompanied by smaller test laboratories and a CAE-supplied engineering simulator.

The on-site expansiveness exceeds that of both the Boeing's 787 Integrated Test Vehicle (ITV) (pdf) and Airbus's Aircraft 0 iron bird

"This is really the first time someone has really made sure we integrated all the systems, all the software in a real aircraft production configuration in one building," said Dewar, who says 4,800h of testing are planned for the facility.

In short, CIASTA is a structureless reproduction of the the CS100.

BA-CIASTA_900.jpg
Moving toward production of the first "structured" CS100, the static test airframe will be first to inaugurate its final assembly facilities, which will eventually be sized for a rate of 20 aircraft per month or one aircraft per manufacturing day. The center wing box for that aircraft, called the Complete Aircraft Static (CAS) test article has been delivered to its Belfast, Northern Ireland facility.

At Mirabel Airport's final assembly line, Dewar says the plastic comes off of the first set of tooling next week and all its tools will be in place later in the quarter. 

After the static airframe, Bombardier will build five test aircraft dubbed its Flight Test Vehicles (FTV). FTV1 will be the first 100 to 125-seat CS100 to fly around year's end, kicking off a 2,400h flight test program. Part of its certification trials will include a 180min extended operations (ETOPS) certification for over-water flights, such as those connecting London City Airport and New York.

Such a mission was part of the initial requirements for the CSeries, and the aircraft maker confirmed it is in "advanced discussions" with a customer for an all-business class layout.

The CS300, due in 2014, will add two additional FTVs for certification of the stretched jet.

With its late-2013 first handover planned, CSeries production will see a gradual ramp up, delivering 40 aircraft in 2014, 80 in 2015 and 120 in 2016. Delivery slots for 2014 and 2015 are both sold out and 2016's positions are 60% booked.

Photos Credit Bombardier
British Airways Cargo Boeing 747-8F G-GSSE RC575

Boeing has reported its orders and delivery totals for 2011, confirming the 9 747-8 and 3 787 deliveries in 2011. In addition, the company reports that 737 Max commitments have topped 1,000 from 15 customers, though still holds only one firm order for 150 from Southwest Airlines, which receives its first re-engined 737 in fourth quarter 2017. Boeing also added 25 new 787 orders to its backlog from an unidentified customer, lifting the total program orders to the positive for 2011.
 
Gross Orders   Net Orders   Deliveries   Unfilled Orders   
 
737 6255513722,365
747  7-1997
76742422072
77720220073380
78745133857
 
 9218054773771
Japan Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner ZA176

Boeing failed to meet its 2011 delivery guidance of 15 to 20 747-8s and 787s, delivering just 12 of its newly certified aircraft, including nine 747-8 freighters and three of the long-range majority-composite twins to launch customer All Nippon Airways.

Beyond its missed forecast, the company faces a larger challenge of a gap in 787 deliveries after the preliminary batch of aircraft are delivered to ANA, Japan Airlines and Air India, while the company works to match its factory production rate with its delivery rate as it manages post-certification re-work.

ANA's third 787, equipped with the recently-certified Package B Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines and long-range 158-seat configuration, was contractually delivered to the carrier on December 30 and is expected to depart Paine Field in Everett for Japan as early as today, say company sources.

The aircraft was to have delivered in November, delaying the start of ANA's service from Tokyo-Haneda to Beijing from December to January, part of a block of seven that the carrier expected before the close of 2011.

Airplanes 41 and nine, both for ANA, were due for delivery in 2011 as well and will both be contractually delivered to the carrier in the first half of January. Both received US Federal Aviation Administration airworthiness certificates just before the close of the year, say company sources.

Boeing will make official its 2011 delivery figures Thursday.

Still outstanding is the regulatory approval of the General Electric GEnx-1B-powered 787, requiring Airplane 35 for Air India to serve as a production article to fly functionality and reliability (F&R) validations, now expected to make it maiden flight in the middle of the month. GE certification was to have been completed by year's-end, clearing the way for deliveries to the Indian flag carrier and Japan Airlines, which begins its first service from Tokyo-Narita to Boston in April.

JAL's first 787, Airplane 23, which completed change incorporation in San Antonio, Texas, is slated to be delivered in mid-February, said the carrier in December. The slip from the end of 2012 further confuses its status as GEnx-1B launch customer despite Air India's claims its first delivery would be ahead of JAL's.

An Economic Times of India report indicated Air India expected its first 787 later in January, a date that seems unlikely to be met with the outstanding certification requirements for the type. The carrier says it expects seven 787s to be delivered by June, all of which will undergo sale and leaseback transactions as part of Air India's financial restructuring. At least one of those seven, Airplane 46, will be delivered from Boeing's Charleston, South Carolina final assembly line.

According to its Z24 schedule, formalized in November, Boeing plans to deliver 45 787s to customers in 2012, or approximately three to four each month, down from the 61 it had planned in Z23. Boeing maintains its goal of meeting a rate of 10 aircraft per month by the end of 2013.

While, Boeing has focused its resources on preparing its early ANA, Air India and JAL aircraft, some 10 787s, including the late 2011 planned deliveries, the company continues to run its final assembly operations at 2.5 aircraft per month, building aircraft that will require re-work, albeit less, to prepare for delivery.

With travelled work still flowing to final assembly in Everett, the company slows its own learning curve by continuing to flow out-of-sequence assembly tasks that would otherwise be done by its suppliers or facilities in Charleston, increasing the difficulty of learning a consistent delivery of a completed statement or work, say industry observers.

Further, the concern, say several directly familiar with the manufacturing operations, is as much the near-term pacing of aircraft as it is the aircraft parked in long-term storage and shuffled around the Everett campus that have not yet gone through significant change incorporation and rework, creating an "air pocket" in deliveries after the initial batch is delivered as resources are brought to bear on the less-complete aircraft.

Boeing aims to build a 787 that will not require any re-work by Airplane 63, say those familiar with the plan, delivering the factory complete jetliner directly to its pre-flight preparations for production and customer evaluations. 

The company has received parts for 787s up to Airplane 56.

If Boeing meets its goal of making Airplane 63 its no-rework aircraft - a goal that at one point was to be met by the 16th and 34th 787s built - fully 59 aircraft will have required post-assembly modifications, including three of the six flight test aircraft.
Chet-Fuller_560.jpg
Chet Fuller, senior vice president at Bombardier Commercial Aircraft, sat down with Canada's Business News Network last month for an extended interview discussing the ins and outs of the CSeries and what it takes to sell the new 125 to 149-seat jet to the world's airlines. 

Interestingly, the conversation does not touch on the tactic of price as a weapon in a sales battle, an often blunt instrument that Boeing and Airbus have used to maintain their edge in the duopoly. Fuller continually emphasizes the technical merits of the aircraft as its selling point and his fierce belief that the capabilities of the aircraft are its trump card.

Additionally, Phillipe Poutissou, Bombardier Commercial Aircraft marketing vice president, sat down with Air Insight's Addison Schonland recently to discuss progress on the new program and he provides an update on the Complete Integrated Aircraft Systems Test Area (CIASTA) "iron bird" test facility which will come online to mature the aircraft's systems prior to the start of flight testing. The CSeries is slated to make its first flight later this year, followed by it service entry late in 2013.

The candid interview with Fuller runs 30min in three parts and can be found here. At the end of each 10min segment, the video will automatically advance to the next part, though you can find links here for parts one, two and three. Enjoy! 

Editor's Note: I'm just back from a week's vacation which took me all over the southeast United States on a 2,300mi road trip across Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi and Tennessee. It was a much-needed break and I'm rested and ready for 2012. Happy New Year, everyone!

Cookies & Privacy