Follow This Blog

Add to Google











Lijit Search

Archives

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      

United States of America(USA).pngFrance.png


Recently in Airbus Category

A320-20in-Aisle.JPG
SEATTLE -- There was a collective "why didn't I think of that?" realization that dawned on the crowd at the Pacific Northwest Aerospace Alliance conference in Lynnwood, Washington this afternoon when Airbus said it was offering a 20in aisle seat to airlines for the A320 family.

The goal is to use the 20in-wide seat as additional ancillary revenue opportunity (aka charge more) for the aisle seat in a six-abreast configuration. Some airlines charge for the aisle seat today, though the difference is that there's no major product differentiation with the middle and window seats. Airbus said the width of the A320's cabin allows for the 3in flexibility in the aisle seat in comparison to the other four seats at 17in.

Varying the width of certain seats isn't new for commercial cabins, Bombardier offers a 1in wider middle seat on the CSeries to make the five-abreast 3-2 configuration more attractive to the 20% of customers who will end up in that seat.

No word yet if any airlines have selected this for its A320 family aircraft.
Building on last Friday's post about unlocking customers to evaluate competing airframer's products, I wanted to look a bit closer at the changes Airbus and Boeing made to develop their respective second generation 777s and A340s. For Boeing, the aircraft maker would evolve the 777-200ER and -300 into the the 777-300ER, -200LR and freighter, while Airbus would take its A340-300 and -200 to become the A340-600 and -500. 

I went digging into the Flight International archive to find the technical evolution of each model and the structural changes that were required from their respective baseline designs. The changes to create the longer range A340s were significantly more extensive with its stretched wingbox, fuselage and revised empennage

With its raised main landing gear, raked wingtip extensions and structural strengthening, the 777, by comparison did not need a fuselage stretch as the original 777-200 and -300 established the airframes for the -200LR and -300ER.

October 1996 - A340-500/600 soft launch
1996-October-A340.jpg
March 1997 - 777-200X/300X launch
1997-March-777.jpg
Additional details of the 777 and A340's evolution are below the fold.
NAS-737-Max-Winglet_560.jpg
To date, Airbus and Boeing have split three of the five announced 737 Max customers: American Airlines, Aviation Capital Group and now Norwegian Air Shuttle.
 
Norwegian's order for 100 737-8s is a big boost for the re-engined jet as it grows its firm backlog and hardly a surprise as the northern European airline is one of Boeing's stalwart narrowbody customers. Though accompanying that order were 100 more Airbus A320neos.

Fundamentally the "minimum change" Max is a derivative development from today's Next Generation 737, just as the Next Generation family was a derivative of the 737 Classic. With 75% non-commonality, the 737-600, -700, -800 and -900 unlocked the Classic's customers to consider the A320. 

The consequence of Boeing's changes to the 737; a new tail cone, widespread structural re-gauging, engine development and a raised nose gear make the Max a manageable, yet expensive (which Boeing disputes), undertaking, concluded Bernstein Research in a report earlier this week. But the result, as illustrated by Norwegian's A320neo order, may also be an unlocked 737 market for Airbus and Boeing to fight over.

Photo Credit Boeing & Airbus

MIAMI -- I'm here in Florida for the next two days for an Airbus simulator training that will explore the European airframer's digital fly-by-wire philosophy, which has oft been a point of discussion about the role of computers and the role of pilots in flying. 
For Airbus, fly-by-wire has resulted in hard limits on the aircraft flight envelope, preventing over-speeding, stalling, and over-banking of the aircraft. The maximum bank allowed is 67-deg, with nose-down pitch not exceeding 15-deg and a 2.5g limit. An auto-thrust system complements the A-floor protection by automatically spooling up the engines, limiting nose up pitch (angle of attack) to prevent the aircraft from stalling and providing best climb performance.
Those philosophical discussions, both of which diverge and converge amongst commercial aircraft manufacturers, have guided aircraft development for three decades now, with some implementation of fly-by-wire included on every single new aircraft in development. The systems have evolved from simply providing a flight control input all the way to being the basis for structural design through limiting loads on an airframe.

The video above shows the technology in action aboard an A320 family aircraft operating around South America in routine operation and presented in rather dramatic fashion. 
First A350 XWB Section 15

Since September, structural parts for the first two A350-900s have traversed the Atlantic ocean and the European continent on their way through Airbus's most distributed commercial supply chain.

Monday, Spirit AeroSystems delivered its first center fuselage from its St. Nazaire, France facility to Airbus's facility pre-final assembly next door. The handover marked the first time on a new Airbus aircraft that a non-EADS company has supplied major structure for a first unit.

Following the build-up of parts and their transition from the airframer's wholly-owned and independent structural suppliers has at times been challenging, while understanding the sequencing of the aircraft's early production.

With the static test airframe, MSN5000, scheduled to be the first A350 to enter final assembly later this quarter, the first deliveries by Spirit, Aerolia and Premium Aerotec to Airbus were in fact MSN1, which will be the first A350-900 to fly. 

Airbus and Spirit confirmed yesterday that while the first forward fuselage section to arrive in Toulouse for final assembly was for MSN5000, as noted last month, that structure was delivered is actually the second to pass through the St. Nazaire site after the first deliveries of parts for MSN1. 

The reason, explained Airbus, is MSN1 will spend longer in pre-final assembly for systems installation and says MSN5000's passing the first A350 to fly on its way to Toulouse is "fully in accordance with the planning."

Flight deck structure (Section 11-12) from Aerolia was delivered in September, followed by transfer of the MSN1 center fuselage panels (Section 15) from Kinston, North Carolina to Spirit's St. Nazaire facility in October and the first forward barrel (Section 13-14) from Premium Aerotec in November to Hamburg for systems installation. This page incorrectly noted that those deliveries had been for MSN5000 and have since been corrected.

The second shipments from Aerolia and Premium Aerotec for MSN5000 were joined together in early December before the end of the month handover to Toulouse. The Premium Aerotec Section 13-14 for MSN5000 bypassed Hamburg for systems installation completely as they weren't required for the static airframe.

Spirit's second unit, MSN5000 or ES, has begun partial build up in St. Nazaire, the aerostructures manufacturer explains:
The Crown Panel, Left Lateral Panel and Right Lateral Panel (also known as the Upper Shell when assembled) for MSN5000 have been shipped to Spirit's St. Nazaire assembly center and is in work there. The Forward Lower Shell and Left and Right Lateral Junction Panels for MSN5000 are still in Kinston and will ship to our St. Nazaire facility later this month.
Tailcone.jpeg
Further, MSN1's Section 19, the A350's tail cone, was shipped in December from Getafe, Spain to Hamburg for build up with the Section 16-18 panels. That aft section's side panels and floor grids are fabricated by Premium Aerotec and shipped to EADS in Hamburg for integration, but it is not known if they have been delivered. 

Photos Credit Spirit AeroSystems & Airbus
A350-MSN5000-FWD2_800.jpg
A350-MSN5000-FWD4_800.jpg
On a wintery morning in St. Nazaire, France today, the first fuselage section of the Airbus A350 static airframe was loaded onto the A300-600ST Beluga transport aircraft. It's destination was Toulouse, France, site of the aircraft's final assembly operations. This airframe, also known as ES or MSN5000, will never fly and will be used in ground testing to validate the static strength of the aircraft's composite wings and paneled fuselage.

This particular section began mating in St. Nazaire on December 9, after it was delivered on September 27 from Aerolia which makes the Section 11/12 forward-most fuselage section in Méaulte, France. MSN1 followed MSN5000 to St. Nazaire and had begun initial assembly as of early-November.

The MSN5000's forward fuselage will be mated to the center fuselage beginning in the first quarter next year and final assembly of MSN1 in Toulouse will begin in the second quarter. First deliveries of the A350-900 are now planned for the first half of 2014.

Additional photos are available below the fold.

Photo Credit Airbus
CSeries-CS100_560.jpg
The reported existence of a customer for the Paris Air Show mystery order for 10 CS100ER aircraft is now pinned to Odyssey Airlines, a possible new trans-atlantic start-up out of London City Airport. Though one question in particular keeps coming up: Can Bombardier's 125-seat aircraft fly the mission in an all-premium configuration?

Narrowbody aircraft not designed with the over-water mission in mind, infrequently find themselves in a niche role crossing the pond. Most notably, the Airbus A318, with its extra long fin has been flying the Atlantic for British Airways from London City in the heart of the financial district since October 2008 with a great deal of success. This is where Odyssey finds its chief competition.

With its steep approach capability and just 32 B/E Aerospace Minipod business class seats in the cabin, the aircraft is able to arrive and depart the 4,984ft runway at London City. Because of the easterly winds and the weight of the aircraft's restricted take-off roll, BA001 makes a fuel stop in Shannon on its westbound hop while passengers are pre-cleared through US Customs. 

British Airways was seriously considering expanding to additional cities on the east coast including Boston and Washington, DC, but that expansion has not yet materialized. As it looks to the future, the double shrunken A318, will not be re-engined with CFM International Leap-1A and Pratt & Whitney PW1100G-JM like its larger siblings and won't benefit from the decrease in fuel burn. However, the A318 will eventually be fitted with sharklets.

To try and answer the question of the A318's probable performance against the CSeries, PianoX, an independent aircraft performance analysis tool was employed to calculate payload capability, emissions and fuel burn over a given segment. 

Here it has been used to compare 32-seat configurations aboard the Airbus A318 against available data on the Bombardier CSeries CS100ER between LCY and JFK. Dimitri Simos, who built PianoX, put together the following analysis comparing the two aircraft across the Atlantic. 

An initial analysis was originally conducted in late 2009 and updated this month. The complete analysis is included below the fold, but can also be found here (PDF).

Airbus just announced that A320 MSN001 - fitted with Sharklets - has completed its first flight from its Toulouse, France base. Video of the flight itself isn't yet available, though Airbus has released footage of the installation process of the new fuel-saving wingtip treatments.

A320-MSN001-Sharklets-A2A2.jpg
A320-MSN001-Sharklets-A2A3.jpg
A320-MSN001-Sharklets-A2A1.jpg
Photo Credit Airbus
A320-Sharklet-2_800.jpg
Following last week's roll-out of the first Airbus A320 fitted with Sharklets - and the new addition of its shark teeth - there were a lot of questions about what modifications were required to actually fit the new winglets to the narrowbody. 

The extent of the modifications made to A320 MSN001 should provide an indication of why a retrofit program may prove to be extremely costly for in-service pre-2012 A320s. 

The flight testing had initially been slated to begin in October, though the installation of the required structure for the Sharklets proved "tedious", with additional work needed in the original 1987-model narrowbody, which has been changed multiple times during its life as a flight test aircraft.

To equip an already-built A320 for flight test, Airbus had to remove the wing's flaps and slats to then remove the wing skin for internal reinforcement and installation of flight test instrumentation. While there are no changes to the wing's spar configuration, the outer spar and most ribs are strengthened with added material.

Of the ribs in the wing of an A320, Rib 27, the outer-most, has been fully redesigned to offer compatibility with the current wing fences and the option to fit the Sharklet at a later date. All of the ribs outboard of Rib 8 have been strengthened after Airbus re-studied the higher bending yaw and torque loads that would come from the installation of the new wingtip treatment.

A320-Sharklet-Rib-Changes.jpg
Further, Airbus is also strengthening the aircraft's center wing box in some local areas, though rather than make second modification for the updates to the structure for the A320neo starting in 2015, the airframer will add "all the modifications in pretty much one pass" on the first Sharklet-equipped A320, says Tom Williams, Airbus executive vice president programmes.

"So we think we'll have it done in a way that will take care of both Sharklet and Neo without having to have two iterations of it," he adds of the incremental approach to the new variant's development.

Additional inboard rib and spar reinforcement for the added maximum takeoff weight and new CFM Leap-1A and Pratt & Whitney PW1100G engines will be incorporated when the A320neo goes into production well ahead of the October 2015 service entry with Qatar Airways.

The strengthened Sharklet center wing box will mean higher structural weight in those areas, though Williams says an airframe-wide weight-reduction plan of around 440lbs (200kgs) will make the reinforcement weight neutral. 

"If you take a delivery of an aircraft last year (2010) and an aircraft next year (2012)," Williams said in April, "You'll not be able to tell the difference between fuel burn and performance of those aircraft; whether they're Sharklet-ready aircraft or not. So, I think it's a pretty good incorporation of some very sound engineering work."

The new Sharklet-ready wings are expected to enter the production system in early 2012 and will be delivered to customers with wingtip fences before being modified with the new winglets following their EASA certification late next year.

Photo Credit Airbus
A350-S13-14-Hamburg.jpg
Spotters in Hamburg captured A350 forward fuselage Section 13/14 being loaded into the Beluga SuperTransporter on Monday. The four-panel Section 13/14 is fabricated and assembled by Premium Aerotec in Nordenham, Germany, another wholly-owned EADS subsidiary and sent by boat to Hamburg for equipping. 

UPDATE: Pictured in the photo is MSN1.

Judging by the photograph, the section was being shipped from Hamburg Airport to St. Nazaire where it will be joined with Aerolia's Section 11/12, the A350's nose and flight deck. The fully joined forward fuselage will be reloaded onto the Beluga for shipment to final assembly in Toulouse. 

Airbus will first activate its final assembly line with the A350 static airframe, dubbed 'ES' by the airframer, followed by the first test aircraft MSN1. After being assembled, ES will be tested in the L34 facility in Toulouse.

Airbus said MSN001's Section 13/14 had been handed over to the Hamburg facility on October 20, while Premium Aerotec said its "first A350 XWB fuselage section" made the 12hr boat journey to Hamburg on November 10 - not saying explicitly if that was ES or MSN001. The announcement came the same day the airframer delayed the new majority-composite jet's entry into service to the first half of 2014. It not clear from the photo if this particular Section 13/14 is ES or MSN001.

Photo Credit Helmut

FlightBlogger Friendfeed

Aviation News and Opinion