« Cessna sets sail for new territory with Columbus | Main | Picture of the year (so far) - V-22 Osprey in Iraq »

Is Pratt's broken blade a break for GE/R-R's JSF engine?

Timing is everything. Bad timing is breaking your engine on the very day your customer tries for a third time to cancel your rival and a new report rubbishes the benefits of competing engines. But that's what happened to Pratt & Whitney on February 4, when a turbine blade on an F135 Joint Strike Fighter engine broke during "proof testing". That was the day the Pentagon told Congress it still intends to cancel the General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 alternative engine.

The blade problem is not news. That's why the engine was being proof tested, to see if it was susceptible to a unique blade vibration that causes high-cycle fatigue. This follows a blade failure on a test stand in August last year. What is news is that this latest incident will delay the first flight of Lockheed Martin's F-35 STOVL JSF, which was scheduled for mid-year.

F135%20on%20test.jpg

The two blades that have failed so far were in STOVL F135s - Pratt thinks the problem is tied to the heavier load on the third turbine stage in the STOVL engine, because the low-pressure turbine has to work harder to power the shaft-driven lift fan. The latest engine to fail was to power the first F-35B - aircraft BF-1 - now Pratt will have to proof-test a replacement engine, which will delay the start of STOVL ground testing by a month - maybe more, they don't know yet.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/20946

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 7, 2008 12:04 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Cessna sets sail for new territory with Columbus.

The next post in this blog is Picture of the year (so far) - V-22 Osprey in Iraq.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.