Is Pratt’s broken blade a break for GE/R-R’s JSF engine?

Timing is everything. Bad timing is breaking your engine on the very day your customer tries for a third time to cancel your rival and a new report rubbishes the benefits of competing engines. But that’s what happened to Pratt & Whitney on February 4, when a turbine blade on an F135 Joint Strike Fighter engine broke during “proof testing”. That was the day the Pentagon told Congress it still intends to cancel the General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 alternative engine.

The blade problem is not news. That’s why the engine was being proof tested, to see if it was susceptible to a unique blade vibration that causes high-cycle fatigue. This follows a blade failure on a test stand in August last year. What is news is that this latest incident will delay the first flight of Lockheed Martin’s F-35 STOVL JSF, which was scheduled for mid-year.


The two blades that have failed so far were in STOVL F135s – Pratt thinks the problem is tied to the heavier load on the third turbine stage in the STOVL engine, because the low-pressure turbine has to work harder to power the shaft-driven lift fan. The latest engine to fail was to power the first F-35B – aircraft BF-1 – now Pratt will have to proof-test a replacement engine, which will delay the start of STOVL ground testing by a month – maybe more, they don’t know yet.

, ,

2 Responses to Is Pratt’s broken blade a break for GE/R-R’s JSF engine?

  1. polo ralph lauren 9 August, 2013 at 3:41 am #

    Heya i am the first time here. I stumbled upon this kind of aboard u come across it genuinely practical as well as it allowed me to away very much. Hopefully to give some thing and also assist other people just like you allowed me to.

  2. fred perry uk 9 August, 2013 at 3:46 am #

    Main congrats Donald with another amazing resource that will serve your entire sector.

Leave a Reply