Subscribe by E-mail

Google Translate

Recent Assets

  • asteroid double Orion.jpg
  • wk2 cables closeup.JPG
  • Administrator WK2_FAA.JPG
  • side to rudder compressed.JPG
  • urm1 test.jpg
  • all video blog post pic.JPG
  • F9QualTank2.png
  • will whitehorn w560.JPG
  • WK2 Branson is seated.JPG
  • WK2 interior rear.JPG

NASA's LADEE to place propulsion contract in May

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)
|
ladee landerW445.JPG
credit NASA / caption: This hovering, lander test

The latest "low cost" Moon mission, the $80 million Lunar Atmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer (LADEE) spacecraft, is to place an award for its propulsion system in May, which will be the second phase of a two phase process. The first phase is for a $50,000 propulsion preliminary design, the deadline for offers for which is 15 January

The team working on LADEE have also been working on a low cost lander with Google Lunar X prize team Odyssey Moon Ventures and has released video of hover tests, pictures of which you can see here

LADEE has also been the focus of a Wired article. You can follow LADEE's progress via its Twitter page here

You can see Hyperbola's previous coverage of LADEE here

Still, it looks remarkably like India's Bhaskasa satellite, which was launched by the Soviet Union in June 1979, but who am I to make such an observation

bhaskara.jpg

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: NASA's LADEE to place propulsion contract in May.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/43712

2 Comments

gaetano marano

.

the NASA Ames center give an UNACCEPTABLE advantage to Odyssey Moon to WIN the """Google""" Lunar X Prize!

as explained here: http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/041odysseywins.html

I did not understand WHY all other GLXP teams STILL don't protest for the GIANT advantage Google and NASA are giving to Odyssey Moon!

.

Chris Boshuizen

The NASA Ames lunar lander design is open to any team, US and otherwise (if ITAR concerns are addressed) and every effort is made to be fair. Any team that wants to draw from this design is able to.

There is no reason to reinvent the wheel. If you wanted restrict teams to using only non-NASA developed technologies, they would be using glue and sticks, because frankly nearly everything in common use derived from NASA (or similar agencies) at some point.

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!

Follow This Blog

Hyperbola Friendfeed