caption:European Space Agency director general Jean-Jacques Dordain is second from right
During a short conversation with European Space Agency director general Jean-Jacques Dordain this morning here in Paris, at the 3rd European Conference for Aerospace Sciences, Hyperbola asked him about India, South Korea and China
During the first public meeting of the Reveiw of US human spaceflight plans committee on 17 June Dordain had referred to these three countries specifically during his telecon with the meeting - listen below - when talking about the future of the International Space Station
With an extension of the life of the ISS to 2020 and beyond becoming increasingly likely (the Review committee will address the issue this month) there is a need to start discussing who will provide what beyond 2015. This had been the notional date for the end of ISS use when it was originally agreed in the 1990s although no date appears in the inter-agency framework agreement that underpins ISS
With China's proven crew transportation capability and India's plans to have its own manned space programme by about 2015 these two countries could prove crucial to ISS logistics support. South Korea is another soon-to-be space faring nation with its Korea Space Launch Vehicle (built with the help of Russia's Khrunichev Space Center) expected to launch for the first time later this month
I can't see any political problems with Korea and India, Korea having had a close relationship with the US since the Korean war in the 1950s and the billion citizen democracy and superpower-to-be India's ties with the US have been strengthened over the last ten years. But China's involvement faces a lot of US Congressional obstacles, I can't see how that officially Communist government is going to get onboard anytime soon
But either way Dordain's view is that "the question of these countries" must be raised soon and to not raise the question of other countries involvement in ISS and these nationos in particular is in Dordain's opinion, "the very worse thing we could do"
U.S. Human Space Flight Committee-Washington, DC Part 2 from U.S. HSF Committee on Vimeo.
on July 6, 2009 2:01 PM | Reply
The problem with South Korea is that they're next to North Korea. The State Department doesn't want to export technology to the RoK that they could use to offensively attack the DPRoK...
Simon ;)
on July 7, 2009 1:22 AM | Reply
Robbie, could you please clarify:
South Korea appears to claim that while KSLV1 is built at Krunichev the follow-on launchers will be home-grown.
How can that be? Making propellant tanks and even avionics is one thing - building engines (even under licence) is quite another.
I seem to remember that Rolls-Royce had a hard time getting their copy of the Atlas 1 engine to work for ELDO.
It is inappropriate to lump South Korea in with China and India as far as spaceflight is concerned. They fit better with Brazil.
on July 7, 2009 10:10 AM | Reply
Perhaps you're not aware Simon of the thousands of US troops that are always on alert with South Korean forces on their side of the demilitarized zone. And Khrunichev is a Russian company so it has nothing to do with Uncle Sam. There is no political problem with south Korea joining the ISS. None.
on July 7, 2009 10:13 AM | Reply
A, Jean-Jacques is 'lumping' Korea in, as you put it, not me and, b, where did you see these Korean claims? I hope to visit Kari later this year so I can provide more details then.