NASA's new human spaceflight standards may not be as rigorous as those it already demands for high profile launches such as James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) or Cassini
In an emailed answer to Hyperbola's question about NASA Launch Services (NLS) vehicle certification requirements and crew transport the US space agency says: "NLS is only applicable to NASA payloads, not crew. You should not infer any relationship between NLS and commercial crew."
Yet for high profile "class A" missions, such as JWST, to be launched on a "category three" low
risk launch vehicle NASA's certification requirements ask for a 14 consecutive successful flight history - go
here for related launch policy directive documentation
United Launch Alliances' Delta IV doesn't have that, Space Exploration Technologies' (SpaceX)
Falcon 9 won't have that until 2013 at least, Orbital Sciences' Taurus II never will because
it only has eight commercial resupply missions manifested and so only the
ULA Atlas V has an adequate launch history - is this what the final report of the
Review of US human space flight plans was referring too with its mystery booster?
Sorry, I hear you say, but that is for payloads, not crew. So are you saying that crews will ride on rockets with a lesser launch history than payloads? And if it is greater, well at least you have until 2016 for those commercial crew programme vehicles but NASA administrator Charles Bolden's hopes of something sooner seem a bit dashed
Is this situation what
Bolden was referring to yesterday in the Senate hearing when he said that
SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft was a cheaper longer term option and that instead Orion was the choice for an International Space Station
escape capsule three year's hence?
Recent Comments