NASA: February 2010 Archives

In response to Buzz Aldrin's article in the Wall Street Journal Burt Rutan has circulated the following:

This sounds fine thru the lens of my friend Buzz Aldrin.  However, the reality is that the new plan has no schedules, no $ and no programs to build government hardware for ANY future manned spaceflight activity.

In 1962 we contracted North American to develop the Apollo spacecraft before we had even decided that we would need to do LOR (lunar orbit rendezvous). It was another 3+ years before rendezvous was demonstrated in earth orbit!   We boldly moved forward with the assumption that the technology would be there. In contrast, NASA has, for the last 2 decades shown that they can burn thru hundreds of billions of $ without flying anything new.  The new plan almost guarantees another decade or two of the same behavior.

Burt Rutan has given Hyperbola permission to print in full the original memo the founder of Scaled Composites sent to Congressman Frank Wolf that was the basis for the Wall Street Journal article that has sparked so much comment including from Rutan himself. Rutan's further comments that he released on 26 February can be found here in Hyperbola's previous blog posting about this episode in the US national debate over what NASA should do next

I occasionally banter with my friend, Mike Griffin on subjects that
include golf, the AGW scare and NASA policy.  After sending him my
latest tirade, he shared with me his recent letter to you regarding
taxpayer-funded space research.  I promised him that I would send you my
thoughts on the debate, which follow:

From my past comments on NASA's post-mid-70s manned space
efficiencies/accomplishments, an observer might think that I would
applaud a decision to turn this important responsibility over to
commercial developers.  However, he would be wrong.

Finally NASA has announced what has been trailled here at Flightglobal.com and Hyperbola for some time, with one twist. rather than the MPLM Raffaello becoming the PMM, it is now the module Leonardo

You can watch here NASA ISS programme manager Michael Suffredini talk about what it would take for this permanent module Shuttle mission. Incredibly NASA originally rejected this idea despite the clear gap in station spares and supplies once Space Shuttle is retired. Now the final Shuttle flight, STS-133/Discovery, will be an assembly mission adding more capability to the outpost and increasing its international contribution

NASA AND ITALIAN SPACE AGENCY FIND NEW USE FOR MODULE

WASHINGTON -- NASA and the Italian Space Agency announced a new use for an existing Multi Purpose Logistics Module (MPLM) known as "Leonardo." It will be transformed into a Permanent Multipurpose Module (PMM) for the International Space Station.

Burt Rutan has released the following statement:

To my friends in the Press...

Since the WSJ chose to cherry-pick and miss-quote my comments to Cong
Wolf and since the blogs have taken that to further mischaracterized my
comments, I am forwarding the Wolf memo in its entirety, in the hopes
that some of this gets corrected.  Some additional clarification of my thoughts follow:

Care of SpaceRefOnOrbit here is the video for NASA's Project M

Care of Spaceflight Now here is a video of the Senate commerce, science and transportation committee's science and space subcommittee hearing about the NASA fiscal year 2011 budget request and human spaceflight plans 

UPDATED: here is another video 

caption: Passed to Hyperbola will this authorisation bill have any more significance than any other?

NASA administrator Charles Bolden will be required to select a heavy lift vehicle concept and start detailed design work within six months of the enactment of the 2010 NASA authorisation act if the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee bill, as it was drafted on 9 February, is adopted

The alleged draft of the Senate committee's authorisation bill, entitled Human space flight capability assurance and enhancement act 2010, sent to Hyperbola includes the possibility of Space Shuttle extension, the expansion of NASA's commercial crew and cargo programmes to include beyond low Earth orbit capability and management by a non-profit organisation of the national laboratory that is the International Space Station's US segment

NASA's Constellation programme Ares I crew launch vehicle and Orion crew exlporation vehicle feature in the latest video from UK singer Robbie Williams. In the video footage from the Ares I-X test is used and the rocket and spacecraft send the singer on a journey through the solar system via the International Space Station and back to Earth 

Narrated by one James Doohan (where's the "Scots" accent?!) this 27min 22s is dated 1981 and promotes the Space Shuttle, in particular the orbiter Columbia, as a new epoch in exploration. Perhaps prophetically the film talks of the destiny of nations and says "time and the loss of will runs [nations] down". Loss of will, something for Congress think about maybe (and this bloggers own government)

In this 5min video (care of Galaxywire) NASA administrator Charles Bolden talks to CNN about Space Shuttle, the International Space Station and the agency's work on education

Click here to launch the Realplayer video of the 1h 38min Congressional webcast of the House of Representatives' committee on science and technology subcommittee on space and aeronautics 3 February 2010 hearing called Key Issues and Challenges Facing NASA: Views of the Agency's Watchdogs

UPDATE: Go through to the extended portion of this blog post to see a video of Bolden speaking about the end of the Constellation programme and other issues at the Johnson Space Center care of the Galveston Chronicle

Free video streaming by Ustream
Thanks to U-Stream and whomever SpaceRef which is organising this video stream you can watch the Next-Generation Suborbital Researchers Conference here at Hyperbola

credit: NASA / caption: Orion is to be cancelled but what will Congress and NASA do now?

If president Barack Obama's plan for human spaceflight wasn't disconcerting enough with little detail then the lack of consultation with NASA personnel in its formation speaks volumes

NASA's deputy associate administrator for strategic partnerships, and prolific blogger, Wayne Hale spoke to the Orion project office's "all-hands" meeting that was held last Friday at Johnson Space Center. Hyperbola has been told that Hale said the agency submitted its fiscal year 2011 request and never received any feedback around Thanksgiving when it normally would. But neither was this just some sort of delay, this time around everybody, and apparently it was everybody, found out what the budget was at the same time this journalist and everyone else clicked on the webpage at nasa.gov

credit: NASA / caption: the VASIMR engine could be on the ISS by 2015

Click here to go to the webpage to listen to the 3min 43s interview with Ad Astra Rocket company president and chief executive Franklin Chang Diaz, former NASA astronaut and inventor of the VAriable Specific Impulse Magnetoplasma Rocket (VASIMR). Chang Diaz talks about his plans for VASIMR and co-operation with NASA that could see commercial services for the propulsion technology during this decade. Above is a NASA created image of the company's VX-200-1 VASIMR flight engine installed on the International Space Station

NASA Edge has tweeted about this time lapse cupola video so here it is in its full glory 

This NASAtv video shows highlights of Space Shuttle Endeavour's STS-130 mission flight day eight, Monday 15 January, and begins with an introduction with Nick Patrick, British born NASA astronaut and STS-130 mission specialist

In what must have been a hell of an edit job Constellation supporters have edited together soundbites from the open meetings of the Review of US human spaceflight plans committee for what some might call good effect and others down right propaganda

C-SPACE says: "NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and others spoke to reporters and answered questions about NASA's fiscal year 2011 budget. The budget cuts most of the funding for missions to the moon and includes new funds for commercial space flight." 
 

A US space agency has undertaken a major manned Moon programme, a new administration is not prepared to fund it any further, vehicles are being cancelled and a report provides options for what happens next, sound familiar? It should it is what NASA has gone through over the last year and it is what happened, more or less, in 1970

Or it is if this history blog is correct in its re-telling - discovered by this blogger via English language Indian tweeter Pradx - of that key moment in US space policy when the Richard Nixon administration ended Apollo

According to the Beyond Apollo blog site Nixon's NASA was presented with five options for what the agency could do next as the Moon programme was wound down

Watch Florida Democratic party senator Bill Nelson describe Review of US human spaceflight plans chairman Norman Augustine's statement about the new Obama spaceflight plan and NASA budget request as "a namby pamby watered down statement"

The joint statement by the International Space Station partners can be found here welcoming president Barack Obama's comitment to extending ISS use and the boost for station related space operations in the fiscal year 2011 budget request. The statement says:

The MCB also noted that the U.S. Administration's 2011 NASA budget submission continues the ISS to at least 2020 and expands efforts to utilize this unique platform for scientific, technological, and educational purposes by increasing the ISS budget by $2B over four years.

 

Tweeted yesterday by Hyperbola, below is the full text of Scaled Composites founder Burt Rutan's response to Associated Press science writer Alicia Chang:

That is not a "NASA plan"; it is the proposed budget from the White House.  It will likely be revised by the Congress. I am for NASA doing either true Research, or doing forefront Exploration, with taxpayer $.

Ares/Orion is more of a Development program than a Research program, so I am not depressed to see it disappear. I am concerned to see NASA manned spaceflight disappear, since they provided world leadership in the 60s and part of the 70s.  The result was America's universities being the leader in Science/Engineering PhDs.  

Many American kids will be depressed by the thought that our accomplishments will not be continued and thus America will fall deeper away from our previous leadership in Engineering/Science/Math.  I believe our future success depends on our ability to motivate our youth.

I would support a restructuring of goals and funding so NASA can be allowed to perform like the 60s on space Research and on Exploration.  There is not a shred of evidence that the President sees any value in those goals.

Alicia, my thoughts have also been distributed to other Media.

credit: Sierra Nevada / caption: Sierra Nevada's Dreamchaser docks with the International Space Station

In the picture above Sierra Nevada Corporation's Dreamchaser reusable vehicle concept docks with the International Space Station. Of NASA's five Commercial Crew Development initiative funded space act agreements announced on 2 February Sierra Nevada won the largest sum, $20 million out of a total fund of $50 million

Sierra Nevada's Mark Sirangelo told Hyperbola: "We are planning to mature our rocket motor system and develop an early prototype drop test vehicle under this programme and supplementing it with our own resources.  It is only an eight month programme in its current form. Our programme goal is to have a usable orbital vehicle in service by 2014. The vehicle will take seven crew and critical cargo to and from [low Earth orbit] destinations and be able to land on a 3,000m [9,800ft] runway.  Our team consists of seven prominent space companies and universities all with considerable experience."

credit: Lockheed / caption: cancelled? but it could fly in 2013 says Lockheed

The total annihilation of the Constellation programme with the culling of the Orion crew exploration vehicle and any vestigal remains of the Ares V cargo launch vehicle was a surprise for this blogger. Despite the prospects for Constellation beginning to look bad last year with the Review of US human spaceflight plans Lockheed Martin officials could still be seen smiling at the technical conferences I attend while Ares contractors were obviously not happy bunnies

And that big smile on Lockheed's employees' faces seemed justified because, for what has felt like forever, we have been hearing that a commercial provider could deliver crew and cargo to the International Space Station but something else would take the brave explorers beyond low Earth orbit. Throughout all of the kerfuffle over the cancellation of Constellation in the last few days this blog has not spotted (correct me if I'm wrong) any one asking the question, what are the astronauts travelling beyond LEO to travel in?     


credit: Boeing / caption: Boeing's commercial crew capsule, so that's what happened to the Northrop/Boeing Orion

click on any of the images in this blog post to see larger versions in the same browser window

Constellation supporters sent Hyperbola this video, watch and make your on mind up

NASA's first foray into private spaceflight, the commercial orbital transportation services programme, also known as COTS, has seen a 60% hike in the agency's investment with the fiscal year 2011 budget

Originally planned to cost $500 million which the agency would match against private finance to help develop new transportation systems, the real cost now looks to be at least $800 million

In today's exploration FY2011 budget teleconference NASA exploration systems mission directorate head Doug Cooke admitted that the $312 million for "commercial cargo" was $300 million of additional monies - over the $12 million originally planned for FY2011 under the FY2010 budget

While the FY2011 budget document refers to "additional incentives" under commercial cargo on page 10 Cooke said in the telecon that the $312 million was "insurance" so they, the COTS companies Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) and Orbital Sciences could succeed; and that the money would help accelerate the programme with "more flights" and enhancements such as "downmass," which could be a reference to Orbital's Cygnus spacecraft that unlike SpaceX's Dragon was not originally conceived as being able to bring back cargo

The hike could be an embarressment for president Barack Obama's new spaceflight vision and his NASA administrator Charles Bolden because the agency and administration has, in the past 48 hours, invested so much confidence in what is effectively the privatisation of low Earth orbit transport of crew and cargo - with the announcement of the Commercial Crew Development initiative funded space act agreement winners

Perhaps the big surprise of the NASA budget teleconference was the sudden announcement by agency administrator Charles Bolden of the winners for NASA's $50 million Commercial Crew Development initiative

This bloggers question, if selected during the teleconference Q&A, would have been, how does CCDev tally with this new commercial crew transportation programme that will get $500 million in fiscal year 2011. Is CCDev, for example, going to be the COTS to the commercial crew programme's CRS?

COTS being the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services demonstration project that is funding Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) and Orbital Sciences and CRS, or Commercial Resupply Services, being a competitively tendered contract for ISS cargo resupply

The winners Bolden announced are Boeing, United Launch Alliance, Blue Origin, Paragon Space Development and Sierra Nevada Corporation. We know that Bigelow Aerospace has teamed with Boeing. Space Exploration Technologies told this blog off the record a whileback that they were not expecting to be selected for CCDev

Deputy administrator Lori Garver explained during the teleconference that the companies that were part of the Constellation programme could use some of the output from that, from the approx. $9 billion invested, to offer spacecraft for the new commercial programme

More detail will be given tomorrow at the 2 February 10:00h local time (15:00h GMT) press conference at the National Press Club when NASA administrator Charles Bolden and John Holdren, assistant to the president for science and technology and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, speak about the new commercial efforts

US spaceflight website space.com has revealed that in a teleconference yesterday the US government's Office of Management and Budgets' director Peter Orszag and the White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer confirmed that president Barack Obama's fiscal year 2011 budget request for NASA does not include the Constellation programme

But with the NASA aprorpiations bill for FY2010 requiring Congressional approval to cancel the Constellation programme the mere fact that Obama has requested in his budget for FY2011 that it be cancelled does not make it so. Healthcare bills anyone?

OMB releases NASA budget higlhights - care of Jeff Foust

Hyperbola is and will be working east coast time to cover the NASA budget publication and reactions to it