Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Recent Assets

  • Bristol boxkite in hangar.JPG
  • Peugeot horseless carriage.JPG
  • To start, spin flywheel.JPG
  • BSA dispatch bike.JPG
  • Hillman Minx at Shuttleworth.JPG
  • Hawkers Hart and Demon.JPG
  • Westland Lysander take-off run.JPG
  • Bleriot in hangar.JPG
  • yourfile.jpg
  • G-PLAL in LR.jpg

Dutch rock-and-roll courtesy of Tupolev

David Learmount
 on May 5, 2011 3:51 PM | | Comments (9) | TrackBacks (0) |

This Tupolev Tu-154 is demonstrating a gyration known as dutch roll, but a rather more violent example than usual.

 

The sketchy details of what's going on where are here.

Before I explain why there are several things about this film that make me a bit sceptical about what's happening, I will describe how dutch roll develops.

If an aeroplane gets disturbed in yaw, for example by turbulence acting on the fin or by rudder input, the sideways movement of the tail makes the aircraft pivot around an imaginary vertical axis that passes through the aircraft somewhere near to where the wings meet the fuselage.

Consider a yaw to the right in this Tu-154. "Right yaw" means the tail has swung right, so the nose swings left. The aircraft is effectively beginning to "skid" to the right.

During that right yawing motion the right wing is moving forward relative to the oncoming air slightly faster than the aeroplane's airspeed, and the left wing's airspeed is slightly less than that of the aircraft, which creates a lift differential between the two wings, with greater lift generated by the faster (in this case the right) wing. That lift difference starts the aircraft rolling to the left.

Another factor exacerbating the roll to the left is the fact that, because the wings have a swept-back design, the advancing right wing is presenting a longer profile to the oncoming air than the retarding left wing, generating even more lift differential in the same sense.

(The Tu-154 has another wing design factor known as anhedral - wingtips slightly lower than wing root - which is intended to dampen a tendency to roll with yaw, but not to eliminate it. On the other hand, the fact that the Tu-154's three engines are mounted in the tail means the tail is heavy, so once a swinging motion begins, it takes more time to dampen it).

Back to that first yaw to the right: the swing of the tail to the right stops when the naturally stabilising force of the vertical fin, which tends to keep the aircraft flying straight with no yaw, equals whatever force caused the disturbance in yaw. That is the end of the first yaw/roll cycle.

If, at that point, the pilot applies right rudder, that will add to the fin's force, and the tail will start swinging back to the left, and the yaw/roll effects begin to reverse. If that swing takes the tail through the point of zero yaw, the aircraft is starting another yaw/roll cycle with the forces acting to create right roll instead of the previous left roll. So the aircraft is now dutch-rolling, and under certain circumstances the cycle will keep repeating.

These gyrations also have an effect on pitch, but that is less dramatic.

Now for the sceptic's questions.

The aircraft took off and made a fairly stable climb-out. The dutch-roll didn't start immediately. When the pilots made a final approach, the aircraft had become pretty stable shortly before it landed safely. How was this stability achieved on departure and again on approach when it could not be achieved during other phases of the flight?

If pilots, on a test flight, encounter a major handling problem, they maintain plenty of altitude while they sort it out, and do not attempt an approach until they have tested handling techniques and a configuration which provides the best stability they can achieve. But this aircraft continued dutch rolling until established on short finals.

Maybe gear-down was the stabilising factor? Maybe. The crew left the gear down a long time on departure. 

Why was this flight being filmed so assiduously? On the other hand, the film doesn't look like a professionally shot one.

Were they worried about getting this long-parked aircraft airborne again? What gave them cause to worry? Should they have gone ahead if they were worried?

Dutch roll as violent as that shown in the film was not the result of autopilot input or the pilots would (surely?) have tripped the autopilot out. The failure of the yaw damper system would not, alone, cause such dramatic dutch roll.

The investigators will look carefully at pilot input. Whatever force caused the first dutch roll cycle, if pilot input attempting to correct the yaw got out of phase with the swinging motion, the phenomenon known as pilot induced oscillation can set itself up, and this can take the form of dutch roll. It's like a driver attempting to correct a skid, overcorrecting and ending up in a skid the other way.

The best way of overcoming pilot induced oscillation, if there is enough altitude to be safe, is to take hands and feet off the controls and let the aircraft sort itself out.

Now let's see what the investigators say.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Dutch rock-and-roll courtesy of Tupolev.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/199175

9 Comments

Can't blame the Dutch for this one. Russian roll, perhaps? Maybe a variation on Russian roll-ette?

;-)


David Connolly

Da Comrade Learmount !. I transited that dodgy land last evening on CA-B-744, ZBAA-EDDF, B-2469, 09hrs 09mins 01 off and 07R on, non-block. No diversions there to UUEE or UULI or UIII thankfully. Still, I am surprised you omitted to mention the distant parallel of the A-300-600 of AA-587 of Nov 12 2001 in New York.
Anhedral, as you say,damps the Dutch Roll, but, this flight of fancy, with it's TU-254 power-planted bulked-up fin, it is clear that it's spiral instability was increased, in Tupolev tradition, yawing and pitching the nose down.
In a slip, the rate of turn is too slow for the angle of bank, so the horizontal component of lift exceeds the centrifugal force, it being inertial resistance.
My upset reflex-recovery muscle memory is "Push-power-rudder-roll", with a bungee discipline eyes closed pro-forma rehersal, till PFD-Blue is up without being blown-up.It is reflective-reflexive science in emotional effect, drilled below the level of awarness to make it reflexive. The video demo is Tupolev comedy, beyond Dutch parody that is CAVOK-Clearly, no Russian laughing matter.

David Connolly

Da Comrade Peter, Russian Roll-ette, I like it. Well thought and said. Everyday is a school day and "Russian Rollette" is one for the books. I wonder if any of the Pre-Rollette Static selected Test Roulette crew is named Smirnoff ?

Most swept wing airliners will Dutch roll if they don't use a yaw damper (or roll damper or sideslip suppressor).Yaw dampers are usually a gyro device that detects yaw rate and feeds a signal back to the rudder. I suspect that the aircraft had just been maintained and maybe the rudder feedback wiring had been reversed. This would amplify the Dutch roll instead of damping it. The only sensible choice in these circumstances for the pilot is to pull the circuit breaker on the yaw damper and hand fly the aircraft to an immediate landing.

Comrade

Too much Vodka!!

Yes, you can take your hands and feet of the controls but you'll continue in heading one direction.

The behaviour of the aircraft is consistent with aileron failure - hydraulic. I don't see any banking anywhere in the videos. Heading was achieved throughout flight by jamming the rudder in direction of travel, perhaps calmer inputs and patience is advisable (seems they caught on later to this). They were jockeying the rudder a bit on a final approach in an attempt to align with the runway (picture heading into a line of parked airplanes on the side coupled with the desire to land -- you will react accordingly). On takeoff no rudder input needed and thus no skidding observed. The effects are dampened as speed bleeds off. No one would be doing that intentionally on final, clearly they were struggling to get the aircraft aligned somewhat with the runway, the outcome is miraculous, reminds me of the DC10 situation (only in this case they had elevator and rudder control).

Toejam

Looks a lot more like Stolichnaya roll to me.

Baruch

It seems like the rudder servo got into some limit cycle similar to a 737 accident when the pilot pushed the rudder to the limit and the faulty servo cilinder got jammed.

David Learmount

My favourite among the system failure theories is Lesh's.

Why? Because crossed controls is not as rare a maintenance error as one would like it to be. It sometimes happens in all countries and involves all aeroplane types.

This is still rampant speculation, however.

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!