Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Recent Assets

  • Flying close to terrain.jpg
  • ICAO ANC assembly.jpg
  • ICAO ANC screen.jpg
  • ICAO.jpg
  • Jamestown.jpg
  • St_Helena-Pos.png
  • St Helena RMS.jpg
  • A350 LR.jpg
  • A350-1000_RR_AIRBUS_V08_300dpi.jpg
  • Fake pilot.jpg

September 2012 Archives

Nepal for fliers

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Today's fatal crash of a Dornier 228-200 in Nepal was the second in that mountainous country this year. There have been nine fatal crashes of twin turboprop commuter airliners in the last ten years, and many more before that.

The crashes in the last decade included three recent fatal accidents involving Dornier 228-series aircraft, four de Havilland Canada Twin Otters and one Beechcraft 1900D.

Today's accident is different from the others, and the reason for it is not clear. Although the weather was good, the aircraft crashed only 2km from the airport where it took off, the pilots trying to return with some kind of problem. Clearly unable to stay flying, they attempted a forced landing close to a river, probably the least cluttered space they reckoned they could reach. Local speculation talks about a birdstrike. Well, Nepal is home to some very big birds, and a strike to propellers, especially both, would be dire. We'll see.

Twin-turboprops are the only category of commercial transport aircraft capable of ferrying the thousands of mountaineers and trekkers that visit Nepal each year to the remote airstrips in the Himalayan foothills - some high among the mountains - from which they can start their adventures.

As a flying environment, Nepal is demanding. Kathmandu is in a deep valley where the visibility is frequently reduced by air pollution. Nepal's mountains, the highest in the world, are a terrain threat to aviation unlike any other. The fickleness of the local weather in the high valleys and in the vicinity of remote airfields is yet another considerable challenge to pilots.

Finally the airstrips themselves are notoriously challenging, with short runways that are uneven, sloping, or both, and with approach and departure paths obstructed by high ground. When the weather changes rapidly, pilots are faced with difficult decisions about whether it is safe to continue an approach, and if the weather closes in too fast, abandoning the approach may be equally risky.

All this is not to say that Nepal couldn't do better in the next ten years. Probably the most effective advice would be from the airlines to their pilots: don't press on when you don't like the look of the  weather. Pilots who try too hard to do their job - getting their passengers to the destination they have paid for - can be dangerous. It's called press-on-itis.

Airbus takes pilots back to basics with the A350

| | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)
Airbus is going to train pilots for its A350XWB differently.

A350-1000_RR_AIRBUS_V08_300dpi.jpg
The first three days in the A350 simulator will be about letting the pilots find out that it is "just another aeroplane". Without using any of the sophisticated flight guidance systems they will be able to find out how it flies and what that feels like. These pilots may not have done that for years on the aircraft they fly now, so they might find out a few things about themselves as well as the A350.

A350 LR.jpg

Airbus' flying training manager David Owens told me at the Royal Aeronautical Society's annual Flight Crew Training Conference in London yesterday that pilots will not be allowed to switch on the automatic systems until they have learned how to fly the aeroplane.

Although Owens didn't spell it out, it seems the industry is beginning to learn that never letting the pilots treat the aeroplane like a flying machine means they never find out what it can do. And more importantly, what it can't.

Loss of control has, in the last 20 years, become a killer phenomenon. You will find plenty in this blog discussing what happens when pilots lose their feeling of having a relationship with their aeroplane, and in the process losing confidence in their ability to take over when the automatics fail them.

Well done Airbus for re-introducing what should never have been taken away in the first place.

Bumming a ride

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)
The fake Italian pilot who has been in the news for making it through security onto flights just by wearing a pilot uniform and carrying a false ID says he was imitating the character played by Leonardo diCaprio in the Spielberg movie Catch Me If You Can

The diCaprio character was based on an real American trickster called Frank Abagnale, who used a pilot identity to travel free of charge, which he did for a long time highly successfully. The Italian, operating under the name Andrea Sirlo, claims to have got his ideas from the film, which implies he was not necessarily after the actual piloting experience assumed in early media reports.

But maybe he genuinely was looking for a way into one of the front seats, and just hadn't made it there yet. His Facebook and Twitter profiles set him up as a Lufthansa Cityline first officer, police found flight manuals at his home, and the picture below strives to provide him with credibility - even if it fails because he's clearly not airside.
Fake pilot.jpg
According to UK newspaper The Guardian he made it onto the flightdeck of a Lufthansa subsidiary Air Dolomiti ATR72 as a "third pilot".

Rumour has it that what actually happened is he was permitted a jump seat ride by claiming he was "commuting" to work, which lots of genuine pilots do.

So sure, there was a major failure of security, but getting to fly is more difficult: to get rostered as crew you have to be on the payroll. The question is, how long would it have taken him to have made it onto the payroll if he hadn't been caught?

Although things have supposedly been tightened up in India now, two years ago there were several cases of "pilots" with no qualifications except a counterfeit licence and log book getting pilot jobs with airlines and operating for months without discovery.

Aeronautical telecommunications and the Wichita Lineman

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

These two companies usually sit quietly in aviation's background but are essential to its operation. The history of ARINC and SITA is the history of commercial air transport. 

ARINC was set up in the USA in 1929, SITA in Europe in 1949.
 
The two telecommunications companies were formed when air transport operators (I won't call them airlines yet) realised that as soon as their aeroplane had disappeared over the horizon they had no simple means to track it and stay in touch with the crew and their progress - and their needs. For a French carrier operating into French West African territories between the wars this was even more of a chancy business than a US carrier setting off from the east to the west coast.

In my RAF Herc during the early 1970s when we landed somewhere in the world that wasn't an RAF base (ie: usually) we used the local ARINC or SITA telecomms service to report our arrival and serviceability state back to base via a clattering machine.

I find the history of telecommunications incredibly romantic. It's easy to forget just how cut off people used to be less than a human lifetime ago, but we thought nothing of it at the time. Telecommunications took over from preceding forms of communication like the original Wells Fargo.

A century ago you'd wait weeks or even months for a letter. Fifty years ago my parents, who had a telephone, would book a Christmas call to relatives in Australia three months in advance. The operator gave you three minutes and it cost my father a week's professional wage. People stumbled over words because there was too much to say in the time. It was mostly about hearing a voice.

In 1976 when I was an instructor at RAF Linton on Ouse my son, just two, would grab the phone when it rang and state confidently "Linton four-one-nine"- just the name of the exchange and three digits. He had no idea what it meant, he just knew that was what you said to the phone.

As I often do, I define my mental imagery in songs that evoke the time and the medium: Glen Campbell singing Wichita Lineman, with that morse-code motif in the music; Chuck Berry singing Memphis Tennessee ("Long distance information get me Memphis Tennessee etc"), Dr Hook singing Sylvia's Mother ... "and the operator said 40 cents more for the next three minutes, please"...

How to be safer than very safe

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Today's generation of modern jet airliners has achieved a historic safety performance high of less than one fatal accident in ten million flights, according to Harry Nelson, adviser to Airbus' head of product safety.

The challenge now, said Nelson, is to determine what can be done to improve even further.

This ratio - one in 10-7 - has a certain engineering significance, in that safety-critical components in civil aircraft must have a tested failure rate better than this if they are to be approved; it was never actually intended to apply to an entire airframe in operation, given that an aeroplane contains many components and is controlled by human beings whose failure rate cannot be tested in a comparable way.

Nelson, speaking at the 17-18 September Flightglobal Flight Safety 2012 conference at London Heathrow, was talking about what he called 4th generation aircraft, in which he includes all Airbus and Boeing marques still in production today and the latest products of manufacturers like Embraer and Bombardier.

Nelson says there is still some "low hanging fruit" - some simple measures - to reduce accidents further. His "low hanging fruit" list included: 
  • the need to stop tailwind landings when they are carried out for reasons other than safety;
  • to develop satellite-based required navigation performance approaches wherever circling approaches are still the norm; 
  • to harmonise and simplify standard instrument departures and arrivals; 
  • to ensure that pilots fully know and understand the basic physics of flying; 
  • to ensure all runways comply with International Civil Aviation Organisation recommendations and have surface grooving; 
  • and to standardise and improve runway condition reporting by air traffic controllers.
In the longer term, Nelson told the conference, the industry should optimise the collection, coordination, dissemination and use of safety data globally, which he said could provide strategic information of immense value to the industry. 

He also added that pilot training needs lots of work, including:
  • At ab-initio level training should be "anchored in Newtonian physics". 
  • Type and recurrent training needs to "keep in step" with the capabilities of high-tech cockpits and modern aircraft performance management;
  • Airlines should adopt evidence-based training;
  • Training delivery and the tools used to deliver it should also be regularly reviewed to be effective with today's young people, said Nelson, observing that "digital natives learn visually".
Finally, Nelson said that current training to deal with the emergence of loss of control accidents as a peculiarly modern phenomenon should concentrate on teaching "what it takes to be in control".

Beechcraft aeroplanes are not just for Christmas

| | Comments (9) | TrackBacks (0)

To mark Hawker Beechcraft's 80thanniversary, the company invited aircraft owners to bring their machines to its Europe and Middle East headquarters at Hawarden Airport, Broughton in England's north-west, last Friday (7 September).


IMG_7739.JPG


The company's press-release about the event contained a claim which, if it is accurate, is remarkable: "Two thirds of all manufactured Hawker Beechcraft aircraft are still in operation today, underlining why it is such a popular choice amongst corporate and private owners alike." 


Think cars for a moment. No long-established car manufacturer could make a claim like that.


Here's a challenge: think of any consumer durable, vehicle or any other product of which a manufacturer that has been in business more than 80 years could say that 66% of all the devices they ever manufactured are still in use. Then reply to this blog entry and tell us.


I suspect the other long-established manufacturers of GA aircraft like Cessna and Piper may be able to make claims that are at least similar. A glance at parked aeroplanes on the pan at any small airfield tells you that aircraft owners don't throw their craft away when they reach 10, 20, or even 30 years old.


It's impressive in a way, but a bit sad too, especially for the manufacturers of new aeroplanes. Is the average age of GA pilots, especially active leisure and sport pilots, on an upward trend too? Maybe I'd better find out.

American Airlines gets FAA approval for iPad EFBs

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)
It's doubtful that even the late Steve Jobs would have seen this coming. The FAA has just approved the use of iPads as electronic flight bags for American Airlines' crews.  Jeppesen provides the software that American's iPads run.

Lots of airlines are trialling them, thousands of pilots use them unofficially, business aviation pilots organise their lives and work with iPads, general aviation pilots navigate with them

But this is the first really big official blessing for a new way of managing information in a cockpit.


Any modern laptop with the right app can do the job, so why the iPad?

Its compact tablet format, touch-screen control and one-touch access to a plethora of functions from flight information through performance calculation to charts make it easy to use in an environment where there's very little space and a lot going on. The iPad's long battery life and high definition display also help.

It's a no-brainer really. The question now remaining is whether anything more than a cockpit-dockable tablet computer is going to be required for the EFB function in the future.