Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Recent Assets

  • Pre-flight checks.jpg
  • Hendell PC-12.jpg
  • Cropped heli.jpg
  • FIN-HELITRAK-Xa.jpg
  • Goldenrules 1.jpg
  • Golden rules.jpg
  • Flying close to terrain.jpg
  • ICAO ANC assembly.jpg
  • ICAO ANC screen.jpg
  • ICAO.jpg

February 2013 Archives

How to build a brand that cruises above the rest

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
British Airways, as a world brand, is second only to Apple among businesses with a base in the UK, and beats all its airline peers according to Business and Consumer Superbrands.

Meanwhile as a consumer brand, BA makes it to number four in a list topped by Rolex, Apple and Microsoft, in that order - and scores ahead of Coca Cola, Google and Hilton.

Quite an achievement. But how?

A brand may be an idea in people's heads, but reality has to play a part in it.

So BA must be doing at least something right simply as an airline delivering a travel product, or the image wouldn't be sustainable. 

Although BA is well known for working hard to promote its First and Club Classes, it has avoided doing so at the expense of its economy image. The airline has successfully sold the idea that all its passengers are buying a difference: something at least a little bit special. 

In a marketplace now dominated by the demand for cheap travel, success in promoting this "difference" idea without pricing one's product out of the game was never guaranteed. But BA kept the faith and is reaping the reward.

Meanwhile Ryanair, with the expansion of its cheap, ruthlessly efficient short-haul passenger processing system - has made BA's marketing job easier by creating an aviation version of economic austerity fatigue. It has heightened the distinction BA strove for.

BA's television advertisement last year was a masterstroke. Far from pushing hackneyed images of smiling stewardesses handing champagne to business travellers in a premium cabin, the airline went out on a limb. 

Instead it presented itself as a real, flying business, with a long, pioneering aviation heritage. It successfully generated the feeling of excitement, adventure and glamour that used to be associated with air travel.

Most people still want to think of travel as an adventure. BA has just tapped into their dreams.

Well done.



Single-engine IMC: is Europe going there anyway?

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)
Helsinki Vantaa-based Hendell Aviation has just been licensed by the Finnish Civil Aviation Authority for single-engine commercial flights under instrument meteorological conditions (SE-IMC) using its turboprop Pilatus PC-12s. 

Hendell PC-12.jpg

SE-IMC commercial passenger flight is recognised by the International Civil Aviation Organisation but not by all European Union states. The problem for those - usually countries with fickle weather - who don't feel able to accept the ICAO standard, is what happens in IMC if the single engine fails. If it's cargo or private flight, the argument goes, people should be allowed to take that risk, but for commercial flight the passengers should not be given the option.

Meanwhile the same passengers would be allowed to charter an ancient, unpressurised, piston-engined Piper Navajo whose performance condemns it to the icing layer below 10,000ft, and this is permitted on the grounds that it has two engines, even if its performance on one is - to put it politely - marginal, and the chances of a failure are more than twice that of a modern turboprop. 

It's easy to appreciate the dilemma the authorities have, but the arguments should be guided more now by incident statistics and the increasing performance and capabilities of modern onboard avionics and flight management systems in aeroplanes like the latest PC-12s. 

Meanwhile the authorities should start asking questions about the advisability of allowing indefinite grandfather rights for ancient piston twins that ply legally for passenger charter. They will never leave the marketplace to more modern equipment if they are provided with an artificial advantage by outdated rules.

Meanwhile Hendell's chief executive officer Matti Auterinen says his company's licence enables him to fly his PC-12s in most parts of Russia, Belarus, and Europe as a one- or two-pilot operation depending on whether the task is pure cargo, or passenger/air ambulance. 

The European Aviation Safety Agency is currently framing rules on SE-IMC operations and these, Auterinen admits, these may eventually affect his carrier. The effect could be positive or negative depending on the outcome.

Auterinen said he tends to the optimistic, reasoning that arguing a case for departing from ICAO Annex 6, Part 1 Para 5.4, which has defined successful SE-IMC operations in North America and much of the rest of the world, is legally difficult to justify, especially while far less reliable operations by vintage twin-piston-engined aircraft are permitted under grandfather rights.
 
Asked whether he believes the certification his company has just won is significant in Europe, Auterinen says categorically yes.

He sees future argument about operational limitations turning as much on the professional skills of an SE-IMC-trained two-pilot crew as the capabilities of the airframe/engine combination, explaining: "If it's done well with a properly trained two-pilot crew drilled in well-tried procedures for single-engine aircraft, we could be looking at a new era." 

With the pressurised PC-12 able to fly at flight levels close to 30,000ft, he pointed out, the glide capabilities give a crew a huge choice of landing options, and using the the UK Royal Air Force high-key/low-key glide approach technique combined with a battery system that permits the autopilot to remain engaged, SE-IMC looks a different prospect than it did some years ago.

If Auterinen is right, chartering a civilised aircraft for less than the price of a small twinjet will become an option.

Virtual first flights for the A350

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Airbus revealed today that the test-bed A350 XWB - known as "aircraft zero" - has started its vrtual first flight (VFF) programme, which the manufacturer describes as "a key step in the final preparation for the actual first flight of aircraft MSN 1 [manufacturer serial No 1] by the middle of this year".

"Aircraft zero" is, in its own way, real: it is the linking of the "iron bird" electric, hydraulic and flight control test bench with a flight deck integration simulator. The manufacturer explains: "This provides the closest core system test environment to the effective first flight of MSN 1. For this campaign, aircraft zero is equipped with a standard of equipment fully representative of MSN 1's first flight."

Airbus continues: "The campaign, set to last for several months, has two main objectives. The first is to prepare for first flight, by simulating normal and abnormal operational  scenarios prior to first flight, verifying the aircraft systems and handling aspects.  The second objective is to ensure maturity by detecting and resolving potential issues as early as possible. The VFF campaign will also allow the flight crew to fully prepare for the first flight and the subsequent flight test programme."