Security theater could make in-flight performance



US flight attendants hold one of the most thankless jobs in the air transportation system (eclipsed, perhaps, only by the role of TSA screener).

Airlines’ pursuit of ancillary revenue has led to the unbundling of in-flight services, and in turn flight attendants have been forced to add cashier to an ever-growing job description that already includes waitress, safety instructor and enforcer, salesperson, sky police, nurse, babysitter, and in-flight entertainment troubleshooter.

Armed with handheld credit-card readers, flight attendants now spend some serious time facilitating onboard transactions for increasingly profitable airlines even as they’ve watched their own pay checks take nose dives in recent years.

So yeah, I understand why flight attendants can be a cranky bunch. What I don’t understand is why they are so deeply opposed to in-flight connectivity.

According to the Atlanta Journal Constitution, the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA wants the government to ban in-flight Wi-Fi, after terrorists tried to turn printer cartridges into bombs in an ultimately failed attempt to destroy two US-bound freighter aircraft. Add the AFA-CWA’s latest request to the union’s long-standing hostility to in-flight mobile connectivity and you’ve got one very large group of employees standing in opposition to all forms of passenger connectivity.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for Fish.JPGGovernment agencies may seek to have in-flight Wi-Fi removed fromaircraft due to fears it can detonate an explosive, but “the fact isthat an explosive rigged to be triggered by Wi-Fi can be detonatedwithout the aid of in-flight Wi-Fi Internet connectivity,” notes travelexpert Steven Frischling, who tangles with the TSA on a regular basis(he’s the guy who told the world about the TSA’s directive in the wake of last year’s panty bomb attempt).

Says Frischling:


“Should a bomb maker design a device that can be triggeredby Wi-Fi, they could attach that trigger to some sort of Wi-Fi enableddevice with a long battery life, disable the “sleep” function andincrease the signal receiving strength of the device without alteringthe look, profile or design of a device, such as a cheep $200 ‘netbook’.



“All someone on board a flight would need to do to set off the triggers is findthat netbook’s pre-created wireless network from another laptop on board. Cheapsignal boosters can easily cover the area of most aircraft, especiallyif the person detonating the device has the ability to place theirtrigger netbook in a pocket and walk to different lavatory areas tosearch for the signal from the privacy of the lavatory.



“Other devices, that are far easier to pack and disguise for bothchecked bags an carry on bags, are likely to be explored before Wi-Fidue to simplicity, size and cost. A device such as Tamrac Microsync,intended for photographers, can easily go unnoticed due to its ultracompact size and be effective within a range of 100 feet (a Boeing777-300 is only approximately 242 feet in length).



“The likelihood of an actual in-flight Wi-Fi Internet connection beingused to detonate a device is unlikely for various reasons, however inflight Wi-Fi connectivity could become the focus of security agenciesas a diversionary tactic. A diversionary tactic that would costairlines and in-flight entertainment and connectivity (IFEC) providersmillions or dollars in revenue, as well as needlessly cost people theirjobs.”

Will flight attendants convince the US government to ban in-flightWi-Fi in the name of security? That’s anyone’s guess. But let’s notforget how the union successfully mobilized its troops in 2005 when theFederal Communications Commission (FCC) dared to propose relaxing thecurrent ban on in-flight cellular telephone use.

Flight attendantsbombarded the agency with concerns about the impact of mobileconnectivity on everything from air rage and emergency communicationsto potential interference with aircraft navigation equipment and – whocan forget – terrorist coordination using phones.

Years later, when in-flight Wi-Fi became available on board US aircraftthanks to Aircell and Row 44, flight attendants raised new concernsabout having to act as “porn police” because airlines initially did notintend to filter obscene Internet content. Some airlines bended, butthe porn-in-the-skies threat proved to be a non-issue.

Thumbnail image for Thumbnail image for AFA on FAA reauth.JPGYet, the AFA-CWA uses the in-flight etiquette argument time and again. It’s latest campaign involves trying to convince lawmakers to pass FAA reauthorization legislation because it will, among other things, “ban cell phone use in-flight and many other improvements for flight attendants”.

Sorry guys and gals, if my flight is going down due to the detonation of a Tamrac Microsync-turned-bomb, I’d like to make a few calls to loved ones. Wouldn’t you?!?





, , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to Security theater could make in-flight performance

  1. Bob November 17, 2010 at 6:48 pm #

    I guess the Feds forgot to fill Steven in on the safegaurds built in to both the Aircell and Row 44 systems to prevent this sort of attack. The protections have been there from the start. Next time someone should be sure to tell him so he doesn’t look like such an idiot.

  2. Steven Frischling November 17, 2010 at 7:13 pm #

    Bob,

    The safeguards have nothing to do with the ability to utilize a laptop or netbook’s wireless computer-to-computer capabilities to detonate a device. This type of trigger can be used on a flight with in-flight wifi or one without in-flight wifi.

    The actual connectivity of GoGo and Row 44 are irrelevant.

    Open your laptop in public, search for wifi (at least with a Mac) and you’ll see wireless networks, not just wireless connections. It is these networks, not wifi internet options, that would allow for wifi technology to be used in a less that intended manner.

    Having spoken with DHS anti-terrorism experts on this they think that the use of a laptop or other wireless devices wifi is unlikely, as many other less expensive and less complex trigger options exist.

    Happy Flying!

    -Fish

  3. fred perry July 29, 2013 at 8:00 am #

    If anyone is fascinated, this great article “Mitt Romney’ t Strangely Careless Penny-Pinching Compulsion” by means of Alex MacGillis within the Brand-new Republic web page illustrates precisely why Romney is absolutely proper not to relieve deeper taxation statements, not really as a intervalle much more. Just simply make sure to read this crap to see what lengths away in to the weeds a fervent reportorial minus musician such as MacGillis will go if provided absolutely nothing of importance or maybe attention. It can be a masterwork regarding pointless mudslinging concerning maussade terms within the duty code that definitely convince Mr.. MacGillis that Romney is really a NEGATIVE GENTLEMAN. n nThe taxation assessments of a prosperous buyer, it should come as not strange, are difficult matters. To assess these adequately involves the skills associated with an curator and a income tax legal professional. Only in that case, soon after carrying out those mind-numbing assignments, may possibly any individual able to to tell apart concerning precisely what is correct along with unbalanced, legitimate and bogus. Mister MacGillis nonetheless desires everyone in order to miss out to the justice period no strike that towards the penalties cycle. Romney’s rich. He’s got used taxes breaks. Sinful? Certainly your dog is sinful. And MacGillis’ received barrows packed with perfectly puzzling along with hopelessly comprehensive information to feed the barrier lifetime of his convoluted, thought-deadening, ahem, rédigée style. in nThe previous couple of a few months have shown further than reach of cavil the fact that criminal party normally referred to as often the Obama to get President Marketing campaign has adopted RESTING AS A PURPOSIVE APPROACH. Ala Coleman their particular saying is definitely “Just declare it! inches Correctly, the actual Democrats likes nothing a lot better than to be able to inveigle their particular mass media allies in to paying another three months accomplishing almost nothing yet talking about Romney’s income tax collection by range (and everyone knows the fact that music need treasured little in the form of inveigling). And to if we all the folks would certainly actually rather not necessarily, if we would choose gouging out each of our sight as compared to digging like termites into 4,000 webpages involving tax statements, recognized and unbiased experts just like the duty wizards Wolf Blitzer, Erin Burnett, Jesse Gregory, typically the aforesaid Mr. MacGillis, and George Stephanopoulos might be in to spell out for you to all of us exactly how questionable as well as my many advantages! oftentimes how unlawful typically the deductions believed online 53 involving additional routine J (as changed 1983) more than likely is actually; not to mention that claimed consumer credit is in infringement regarding Segment 200-1g (section 512, subsection LII, paragraph 69) of the Utah taxes computer code, and also supporting, about, the bringing of a offender actions from the Governor on the grounds that he evaded coverage income acquired through light slavery within abuse in the Marketing Moonshine to be able to Mormons Action of 1934, along with we have to merely reserved the several weeks regarding September along with Sept to essentially be able to the bottom of this. n nCats may pursue dogs along with snow dark prior to we need to look at an end into the décor.

Leave a Reply