More B-2A crash speculation

You can look this one up. See FY 09 budget request, justification materials, US Air Force, Aircraft procurement-Vol. 2, page 71.

You’ll find on that page a detailed description for not one, but two potential mechanical problems that could cause a B-2A to crash.

Here’s a sampling (read highlighted text):

b2enginefanblade5.jpg

The problem is caused by the B-2A’s distorted engine inlets.

The distortion causes excessive wear on the stage 1 fan blades for the F118-GE-100 engines. Take that and an unplanned “foreign object damage event”, and, voila, your $1.1 billion bomber may experience a “catastrophic in-flight emergency”.

But there’s another problem. A loose fan blade also can spark an “uncontained titanium fire”. According to the same document, the titanium fire — whatever that is — may cause a “Class A event”, or what normal people call a “crash”.

The problem is listed in the budget justification documents because the USAF is buying repair blades this year to fix the problem. I’m sure it will be interesting for the investigators to find out whether the “Spirit of Kansas” had received the repairs before the crash, among other items of interest, of course.

Subscribe

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter to receive updates.

11 Responses to More B-2A crash speculation

  1. JOHN.T. 12 March, 2009 at 8:53 pm #

    it is amazing how sometimes lack of testing brings proof the hard way that there was a problem with the CONCEPT of the airplane from the start.
    engines and enginehousing should have been tested during the pre-production periode by the aircraftfactory !

  2. SMSgt Mac 14 March, 2009 at 6:52 pm #

    Maybe it is because I am the son of an ‘Engine Man’ who had been tutored in gas turbine theory by the time I was 12, but I find this information is neither alarming nor atypical of many aircraft.

    Asymmetrical airflow occurs in any asymmetrical engine inlet/nacelle, and under certain circumstances even in ‘perfectly’ round inlets. By way of example, Rohr, Boeing and CFM had a particularly tough time putting the CFM-56s on the 737-300s because the installation required rotating the engines such that the accessory pack/generators were canted AND the lower wing of the 737 (vis-√†-vis a 707 et al) required distorting the engine inlets into a sort of tri-oval design. That installation design was prone to some VERY interesting first stage fan blade bang/stall events until they got it worked out for the regime it would be operating in. All engines run the risk of shedding blades, and engine fires…and they do occur.

    As this seems to be a durability issue, obviously the 119 is not as robust in the first stage as the AF now desires, because you can bet your bottom dollar that this engine was tested on a stand WITH a representative inlet installed.

    Any assertion there wasn’t ‘enough testing’ done earlier based upon this post indicates a naivet√© concerning the purpose and scope of ‘test’ (not to mention R&M). Deducing some deficiency of concept from the improvement effort planned screams a surfeit of knowledge on aircraft design and optimization.
    Good on the AF for keeping the edge on sharpest, longest knife in the drawer.

  3. Search engine placement specialist 6 December, 2009 at 3:24 am #

    This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

  4. Watch Big Bang Theory 10 January, 2010 at 1:43 pm #

    Love this show Sheldon’s neurotic tendancies, Leonard’s kind heart, Raj’s inability to talk to women, Howard’s sleazyness and Penny is hot! Best show on tv!

  5. Washington Appliance Repair 19 July, 2010 at 12:54 pm #

    Wonderful to read!

  6. Portland Landscape Designer 23 July, 2010 at 10:53 am #

    Thank you for a great post

  7. Cordless Radar Detectors 23 July, 2010 at 10:18 pm #

    So many mists in March so many frosts in May.

  8. Max Lagerman 24 July, 2010 at 2:45 am #

    Technology is getting more amazing as time passes. I cant wait to see whats being created 10 years down the road. Electronics have been devolping at such a rapid rate. Noone can expect whats coming next.

  9. Anibal Lautner 24 July, 2010 at 6:37 pm #

    Some people just dont understand, patents are needed otherwise, when the inventor cant sell his product. the real networks Philosophy… “When you can’t sell your products on your own, just sue anyone else that does the job better.”

  10. Diabetic Kit 24 July, 2010 at 6:42 pm #

    Advantageously, the post is in reality the freshest on this worthw hile topic. I concur with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your next updates. Just saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the exceptional clarity in your writing. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any updates. Solid work and much success in your business enterprize Mens Diabetic Socks is the best place to find diabetic related accessories.

  11. Wilson Reid 16 September, 2010 at 5:55 am #

    I sort of found this blog by mistake, but it caught my attention and I thought that I would post to let you know that I really like it. I enjoyed this post and will be bookmarking you.

Leave a Reply