« Are these the (allegedly) defective F-22 parts? | Main | Will "buy American" become the defense spending debate of the 2008 election? »

Study: Flying Predators bad for pilot's health, family life

A research team from the Naval Postgraduate School last month quietly published some surprising findings about MQ-1 Predator flight crews.

A previous study found that the shift-work nature of Predator flight operations takes a toll on the crews. The average MQ-1 crew -- a pilot and sensor operator -- was likely to show signs of severe fatigue more often than crews for any other "high-demand/low-density" asset in the US military aircraft inventory.

The USAF made some big changes after the first study was published. To help crews adapt their circadian rhythms to the grind of shift-work, MQ-1 operational tours switched from weekly to monthly. Crews also were given three days off instead of two to help recover.

All those changes were supposed to help relieve the fatigue problem, but the research team for last month's follow-up study found that nothing had changed. Despite operating from a home base, Predator crews are still the most fatigued flight crews in the military.

Here are some more findings from the study:

Overall Assessment: Based on the data collected, the investigators noted the following: • Survey results were essentially unchanged compared to one year ago and indicated a pervasive problem with chronic fatigue. • Nearly 50% of surveyed crewmembers met the diagnostic threshold for levels of daily sleepiness which can be expected to adversely impact job performance and safety. • Duration of being a shift worker, decreasing sleep quality, and impaired domestic relationships were all associated with increased fatigue. • M&S did not identify an alternative shift schedule which would result in improved work effectiveness over that predicted for the current schedule. • The root problem for this population was not the shift system features themselves, but rather a lack of adequate manpower to provide sufficient recovery opportunities.
predatorpilot.jpg

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/25486

Comments (2)

RTLM:

The USAF might ought to follow the Army model in their approach to UAV crews: They allow senior enlisted and Warrant Officers to pilot their UAV's instead of assigning only trained USAF pilots (Officers) to fly the platforms.

This is demonstrated by the Army's push for 45 MQ-1C Warrior squadrons.

LINK

Juan:

Maybe the USAF should buy the Raytheon Universal Control System.

http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/ucs/epress/index.html

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

ADVERTISING <

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 15, 2008 12:19 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Are these the (allegedly) defective F-22 parts?.

The next post in this blog is Will "buy American" become the defense spending debate of the 2008 election?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.