Archives

Recent Assets

  • ITAF_QRA.jpg
  • Hawk KSA 560.jpg
  • 7117003209_0a89e5b7fa_h.jpg
  • 7176702010_df702a73fc_b.jpg
  • Voyager.jpg
  • Voyager 560.jpg
  • Grizzly 560.jpg
  • MSN2 560.jpg
  • 111207-F-AQ406-219WICf22.jpg
  • 120510-F-AD344-089t6vance.jpg

F-35 vs 787, part 4: The Finale

BF-2 rolled off the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter assembly line in Fort Worth last Saturday. Completing the fourth prototype came about one week late, but, Lockheed Martin says, still well "within the noise" of the overall production schedule. More significantly, Lockheed is still pumping out one aircraft per month, a rate that must be sustained through the end of 2009 to finish off the prototype fleet on time to support an aggressive flight test schedule.

So far, so good.

bf2.jpg

But what happens when the annual output rate basically triples from 2010 to 2012 (12 to 32 + a few foreign orders), then almost quadruples from 2012 to 2014 (32+ to 118+)?

F-35 program manager Lt. Gen. Charles Davis, who I interviewed last month, told me he already is seeing the strains of simultaneous ramp-ups for both JSF and the 787 as he visits production sites worldwide. "I'm fighting for space in the plant that's for 787 stuff," Davis said.

Davis also takes a philosophical view on the causes of recent production system meltdowns for any aerospace program, including the 787. The increasing sophistication of tools for designing aircraft has simply outpaced the progress in manufacturing technology and capacity, creating an unhealthy imbalance as programs transition from the development to the production phase.

The JSF program is hoping to cope with this phenomenon by investing an extra $1.5 billion in upfront tooling, mainly to bring second-source suppliers, such as TAI in Turkey and Terma in Denmark, up to quality and rate standards for the F-35 program, Davis said. He describes the $1.5 billion investment as a necessary cost growth in the beginning of the program that will pay huge dividends by the sixth and seventh years of production, as the monthly production rate exceeds 10 aircraft.

Behind the scenes, the US and UK industry partners are working intensely with other foreign manufacturers that will serve as second source suppliers on critical parts in the full-rate production phase. Northrop Grumman's Randy Secor, a vice president for the F-35 program, told me earlier this month that TAI's employees have been trained on the production line with Northrop's mechanics and assemblers. "Lack of a critical part at a single supplier will stop you dead in your tracks," Secor said.

But F-35 industry officials are also realistic about the difficulty of staying on track as the production rate escalates after 2012. Secor told me that he expects "huge challenges" with meeting the one aircraft per day target after 2016, but it is achievable if the entire industry team works together to solve the problems that arise rather than pointing fingers.


0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: F-35 vs 787, part 4: The Finale .

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/33665