Archives

Recent Assets

  • X15poster.jpg
  • Boeing Concept FAXX June 2008.jpg
  • faxxslide manned alternatives June 2008.JPG
  • FAXX slide Boeing July 2009.JPG
  • Boeing Concept FAXX July 2009.JPG
  • OBL.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_8.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_9.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_7.jpg
  • 3942_Hitlers_Stealth_Fighter-13_10240768.jpg

Congress: USAF under-reported C-130J costs

| | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0) |
Confusion about the L-3/Alenia C-27J's price tag relative to the C-130J's sparked one of history's most memorable lines from a Congressional hearing earlier this year on military acquisition. Here's that famous exchange between Rep Neil Abercrombie and USAF acquisition head Sue Payton:

"REP. ABERCROMBIE: Ms. Payton, you are right on the edge of getting into the Blues Brothers.

MS. PAYTON: Sorry sir, I don't mean to be there. I --

REP. ABERCROMBIE: That's when -- when Jake says, Bill, but you lied to us about the band. They lied to me when I was in prison about the band. You haven't kept the band together. He goes, I never lied to you. I bullshitted you a little bit, but I never lied to you."

Six months later, Abercrombie's hunch proved right on the mark. The defense appropriations conference report approved by the House last week explains that the twin-engined C-27J costs much less than a four-engined C-130J after all. Here's the language:

"The report (H. Rept. 110-652) accompanying the House bill noted that, at the time of the report, the Air Force was reporting a unit cost for JCA of $60.7 million, and was reporting a unit cost for C-130J aircraft of $56.7 million.

After further discussion with the Air Force acquisition officials and clarification of terminology, we believe that a fairer, apples-to-apples comparison of such costs would raise the comparable average procurement unit cost for a C-130J to $84.2 million, in terms of fiscal year 2007 dollars."

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Congress: USAF under-reported C-130J costs .

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/36101

4 Comments

Is it just me or is the USAF the most troubled procurer? You know what they say - the common link in all of your failed relationships is you.

At LAST

Now this explains the massive bill for every single FMS deal covering the Hercules Juliet...

To be fair, the listed amounts are much higher than the flyaway price for both aircraft. The C-27J flyaway price is about $33 million, according to the army. FMS packages are loaded with extra costs for spares and logistics.

Anonymous


Yes, FMS packages are loaded with extra costs. But if we use the flyaway price listed for the Juliet by the USAF the costs more than double, more often than not they almost triple!
Comparing with the C-17 FMS deals this seems to be ununsually high.

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!