Time to restart Su-25 production, but where?
The Sukhoi Su-25 fought on both sides and once again proved an irreplaceable tool of close air support [CAS] for troops on the battlefield.
This mirrors the A-10A case with the USAF, as demonstrated
in
Armored attack aircraft with high maneuverability and heavy weapons load remains the best CAS solution. Although the five-day war took a heavy toll on both Russian and Georgian Su-25 inventories, this is, in a sense, another indication of the important role the aircraft played in the conflict.
If any troops experienced "aerophobia" during this war (and
quite many surely did), this is a great deal due to the awesome Su-25. The
Georgian war makes the case even more impressive, knowing that Su-25s fighting
on both sides were made by
The enterprise has been without work for more than 15 years,
with very vague chances for revival. Besides, many components came to
(Admittedly, Georgian government considered this option some time ago, with intent to place a worthwhile order).
At the same time,
The plant still keeps some parts in stock for Su-25UTG and Su-39 (advanced version of Su-25). The Russian navy is known to have requested a batch of Su-25UTGs to supplement few in service on its only carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov.
While the UTG may require nor or little changes, the Su-39 must find a new, more modern engine, as well as avionics set, to become worthy of series production.
Some time ago. the Russian air force was looking for solutions to its need for a "Lightweight Combat Aircraft". A single seat version of the Yakovlev Yak-130 fighter trainer was the leading contender.
Can an armed version of a dedicated trainer actually replace well-armored, purposely designed attack aircraft? Perhaps, it can only supplement it.
Recent Comments