Archives

Recent Assets

  • X15poster.jpg
  • Boeing Concept FAXX June 2008.jpg
  • faxxslide manned alternatives June 2008.JPG
  • FAXX slide Boeing July 2009.JPG
  • Boeing Concept FAXX July 2009.JPG
  • OBL.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_8.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_9.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_7.jpg
  • 3942_Hitlers_Stealth_Fighter-13_10240768.jpg

Using UAVs as anti-missile escorts for airliners?

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0) |
Honeywell has applied for a patent to use drones as anti-missile escorts for airlines as they approach and takeoff from major airports. Interestingly, the patent application filed on 14 August uses a drawing of a Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk as the notional aircraft.

droneinterceptairliner.jpgSource: USPTO.gov

The idea is to use the UAV to detect the missile launch and dispense flares that should divert the heat-seeking missile's attention.

This is apparently Honeywell's alternative to the more direct method of installing directed infrared countermeasure turrets on the airliners.

According to the patent application, here's how the idea works:

"This formation drone aircraft, which carries various missile detection and diversion equipment, is controlled by a wireless data link that is coupled directly into the airliner's flight control system.

When the formation drone determines that a missile is being viewed by a missile sensor head, the formation drone lays down a predetermined pattern of exploding flares to divert the missile away from the airliner, attempts to spoof the missile using laser countermeasures, or sacrifices itself to protect the airliner."



0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Using UAVs as anti-missile escorts for airliners?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/34983

2 Comments

Fascinating. Of course we'll need an armed Predator to keep track of the Global Hawk in case it happens to stray too close to the airliner. Then, F-16s to patrol nearby in case the Predator goes astray. etc, etc, etc.

Interesting. But, I only see it "practical" for the protection of a single high value target.

The numbers required to protect every inbound to Reagan National would be quite large, not to mention a logistics nightmare (where to land/takeoff the drones, traffic deconflict, etc.)

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!