Archives

Recent Assets

  • X15poster.jpg
  • Boeing Concept FAXX June 2008.jpg
  • faxxslide manned alternatives June 2008.JPG
  • FAXX slide Boeing July 2009.JPG
  • Boeing Concept FAXX July 2009.JPG
  • OBL.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_8.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_9.jpg
  • SU_PAKFA_pic_7.jpg
  • 3942_Hitlers_Stealth_Fighter-13_10240768.jpg

GWOT costs USAF 65 airframes so far

| | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0) |
Air Force magazine's Michael Sirak today posts an interesting tally of USAF airframe losses since Sept 11, 2001. The count includes seven aircraft shot down or lost in direct combat and another 58 lost in "contingency" operations.


The manned contingency loss breakdown is: one A-10A, two B-1Bs, one B-2A, one C-5B, one C-130H, one F-15E, four F-16s, two HH-60Gs, two MC-130Hs, one MC-130P, six MH-53s, and one U-2.

The unmanned losses are: 39 MQ/RQ-1 Predators, one MQ-9A Reaper, and two RQ-4A Global Hawks.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: GWOT costs USAF 65 airframes so far .

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/39308

2 Comments

Well, at least the war is convenient for the selling the idea that all the losses were war related to the gullible taxpayer.

Of course the C-5B was gross aircrew error. I find the distinction on the B-52 loss with 6 aircrew as splitting hairs.

It would be far more informative if more precise details of these losses were given. One remembers the disinformation of Korea and Vietnam with rehard to losses. Why can't there be more honesty ?

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!