Archives

Recent Assets

  • 8083138382_e07f5345af_ov2.jpg
  • hermes 450 560.jpg
  • AIM_120.jpg
  • ZM136.jpg
  • GR4 560.jpg
  • Hurry 560.jpg
  • fotoLo154.jpg
  • T-XdraftKPPs.jpg
  • 090304-F-3352w-044.jpg
  • vulcan 560.jpg

Saab's F-35 rebuttal to Norway

Three weeks after Norway's ministry of defense shocked Saab by selecting the F-35 over the Gripen NG one month ahead of schedule, the Swedish manufacturer has issued a rebuttal.

Here are some highlights:

  • The claim that Gripen does not fulfil the operational requirements ... turns out to be founded on simulations previously unknown to us. To our understanding those simulations must be based on incomplete performance information, simply because such information about Gripen has neither been communicated to us nor requested from us or the Swedish government.

  • "It was a great surprise to Saab when the Norwegian evaluation committee concluded that Gripen would have a higher life cycle cost. It is not consistent with what we know of the costs of keeping different air crafts operational over time. If the claimed estimates are correct it would be cheaper for Norway to obtain JSF, even if Sweden would have developed and given 48 Gripen Next Generation (NG) as a gift to Norway. It should be unreasonable."

  • "The number of aircraft has been changed from 48 to 58 and the operational life cycle has been extended from 25 to 35 years. These are two new conditions entirely decisive for the calculation. That these calculations to a large extent have been conducted without dialogue is most unusual and has contributed to an incorrect picture of the alternatives."

Read Flight's news article here.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Saab's F-35 rebuttal to Norway.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/42342