USAF re-orients frustrated jamming strategy
By Stephen Trimble/Washington DC
The US Air Force has dramatically changed the focus of a
frustrated, decade-long attempt to revitalize its ability to jam radars and
communications systems.
After abandoning a second attempt earlier this year to
convert some Boeing B-52Hs into standoff jamming platforms, the USAF investment
strategy has shifted to fielding less expensive "stand-in" systems that could be
delivered within a few years.
"In this new environment, as we look at this
fiscally-constrained world, we've got to figure out how to do it with less
money, but we also have to figure out how to do it faster," Maj Gen David J.
Scott, air staff requirements director, said 20
October.
![When Stealth Technology Become Useless / On 27 March 1999 [ PowerRussia ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oI1zfIUHtGI/hqdefault.jpg)
Scott, addressing the Association of Old Crows annual
convention, cited Raytheon's miniature air launched decoy-jammer (MALD-J) as a
key priority in the new strategy. The MALD-J remains in development, but, when
deployed, will fly into defended airspace and jam hostile radars.
The USAF also has revealed plans to adopt a low-cost
strategy to augment its aging and heavily used EC-130 Compass Call fleet.
Compass Call crews jam communications systems ranging from the command and
control networks of peer militaries to mobile phones carried by insurgents for
coordinating ambushes or triggering improvised explosive
devices.
Two weeks ago, the
The USAF may acquire low-cost, communications jamming
pods for "existing aircraft", and deploy them no later than 2012, the survey
notice says.
Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), fighters, bombers and
transports could be used to carry the pod, the notice says. Performance
requirements for the jamming system are classified, but the survey notice says
some are "challenging". If a company is unable to deliver a fully compliant
system by 2012, it should explain how it could be upgraded to meet all of the
requirements later, the notice says.
The low-cost, stand-in jamming strategy is the latest plan for addressing the
The USAF chose not to replace the EF-111 Raven fleet,
retired in 1997. Two years later,
In 2002, the USAF launched the airborne electronic
attack system of systems strategy, which called for acquiring the B-52 standoff
jamming system. But the USAF cancelled the programme in 2005, claiming the
programme's cost had ballooned from $1 billion to $7
billion.
A scaled-back version of the B-52 concept was revived in
2007, renamed the core component jammer. But the USAF acknowledged that the CCJ
programme was eliminated in budget plans earlier this year.
"I think when you see the final [Fiscal 2012 programme
objective memoranda and FY2011 budget request], I think you'll see that we've
tried to do some things to improve those capabilties," Scott
says.

on October 23, 2009 3:13 PM | Reply
Little typo just below your headline. Quote,"Click on the video to hear Lt. Col. Dale Zelko describe the moment a Serbian missile shot down his F-117 stealth fighter. " Shot down WHO'S stealth fighter? Scott O'Grady was piloting the F-117 not Lt. Col. Zelko.
on October 23, 2009 3:15 PM | Reply
Ooops! Double post sorry!
on October 23, 2009 3:24 PM | Reply
Hi Flightdreamz. I actually made that mistake a couple of days ago. Scott O'Grady was shot down over Bosnia in 1995 in an F-16. Zelko was shot down in 1999 in an F-117 over Serbia. But both incidents very often get confused by me and many others.
on October 23, 2009 6:28 PM | Reply
I stand corrected, thanks for the quick response.