Archives

Recent Assets

  • ITAF_QRA.jpg
  • Hawk KSA 560.jpg
  • 7117003209_0a89e5b7fa_h.jpg
  • 7176702010_df702a73fc_b.jpg
  • Voyager.jpg
  • Voyager 560.jpg
  • Grizzly 560.jpg
  • MSN2 560.jpg
  • 111207-F-AQ406-219WICf22.jpg
  • 120510-F-AD344-089t6vance.jpg

AVIC JF-17 vs CATIC JF-17

jf-17.jpg
Somebody should get the AVIC and CATIC marketing staffs back on the same page.

I realized yesterday that I had picked up two different product cards in the exhibit halls of the Paris Air Show for the JF-17 Thunder, the low-cost, multi-role, Chinese-Pakistani collaboration.

One of the product cards came from AVIC, the JF-17 designer and manufacturer. The other card was produced by CATIC, office export/import for Chinese aerospace products. Each card shows different statistics for the same aircraft. I understand that different assumptions could drive changes in maximum take-off weight and ferry range. But surely the overall length and height of the airframe should be the same?

My guess is that CATIC is the culprit. I checked the CATIC web site, and the JF-17 page lists specifications that more closely match-up with the AVIC product card. 

SpecificationsAVICCATICDifference
 
Takeoff weight 9,100kg9,100kgSame
SpeedM1.6M1.6Same
Length14.26m14.0m(-) 0.26m
Wingspan9.46m*8.5m(-) 0.94m
Height4.77m5.1m(+) 0.24m
MTOW13,300kg12,700kg(-) 600kg
Ceiling16,000m16,700m(+) 700m
Ferry range2,037km3,000km(+) 963km
 
 
*AVIC wingspan includes wing-tip missiles

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: AVIC JF-17 vs CATIC JF-17.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/203291