<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>The DEW Line</title>
        <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:23:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>PICTURE: RAF stalwarts make Royal farewell</title>
            <description><![CDATA[I was on a Eurostar train bound for Paris on Saturday at the same time as a flypast over central London, which coincided with the annual Trooping the Colour event and the Queen's official birthday celebrations.<div><br /></div><div>That's not something we'd&nbsp;normally&nbsp;cover on The DEW Line, but the array of Royal Air Force types on show included one of the last major opportunities to see two of its air transport fleet's true stalwarts from the last several decades in the air together. By the time the next event takes place in 2014, the Lockheed TriStar and Vickers VC10 shown in the great Crown Copyright image below will both have left service, replaced by Airbus A330 Voyager tanker/transports.</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/Blasts.jpg"><img alt="Blasts.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Blasts-thumb-560x531-178225.jpg" width="560" height="531" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div><div>I'll hope to see the pair airborne again at the Royal International Air Tattoo at RAF Fairford next month, where a Voyager is also likely to be on show. Due to bow out in late September, the VC10 in particular could provide one of the best sounds at the show.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/picture-raf-stalwarts-make-roy.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/picture-raf-stalwarts-make-roy.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">RAF</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Royal Air Force</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">TriStar</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">VC10</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>PARIS 2013: Two-seat JF-17 model</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/PAS2013-JF-17-two-seat-178219.html','popup','width=1200,height=769,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/PAS2013-JF-17-two-seat-178219.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="PAS2013-JF-17-two-seat.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/PAS2013-JF-17-two-seat-thumb-560x358-178219.jpg" width="560" height="358" /></a>The FG defense team noticed this model of a two-seat Chengdu JF-17 fighter, though it looks like it also has fatter spine aft of the cockpit. The engine nozzle also looks different from the Klimov RD-93, so this model would probably be equipped with the Guizhou WS-13 turbofan. Our Asia expert Greg Waldron will have more on this later--assuming the Chinese feel like talking (and they often do). </font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/paris-2013-two-seat-jf-17-mode.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/paris-2013-two-seat-jf-17-mode.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>PARIS 2013: Rivals Embraer and Beechcraft show off COIN aircraft</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Both the Embraer A-29 Super Tucano and its arch-rival the Beechcraft AT-6 are both here at the Paris Air Show in Le Bourget, which is located in the greater Paris region of France. The military presence here is somewhat limited compared to years past due to the lousy budget environment. The US military barely has a presence here, but Russia has stepped up its game--the Sukhoi Su-35 flew a couple spectacular qualifying demos here yesterday. That jet is just awesome.</font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Super-T-Paris-2013-178210.html','popup','width=1200,height=731,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Super-T-Paris-2013-178210.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="Super-T-Paris-2013.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Super-T-Paris-2013-thumb-560x341-178210.jpg" width="560" height="341" /></a><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/AT-6-PARIS-2013-178213.html','popup','width=1200,height=627,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/AT-6-PARIS-2013-178213.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="AT-6-PARIS-2013.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/AT-6-PARIS-2013-thumb-560x292-178213.jpg" width="560" height="292" /></a>Anyways, good defense stuff is in short supply this year&nbsp;here at Paris, but if its worth reporting the FG defense team will find it.</font></font></font></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/paris-2013-rivals-embraer-and.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/paris-2013-rivals-embraer-and.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">COIN</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Sukhoi PAK-FA spin recovery footage</title>
            <description><![CDATA[






<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
  <o:AllowPNG/>
 </o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:TrackMoves>false</w:TrackMoves>
  <w:TrackFormatting/>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>
  <w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>
  <w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
  <w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
   <w:DontAutofitConstrainedTables/>
   <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/>
  </w:Compatibility>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="276">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->

<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
</style>
<![endif]-->



<!--StartFragment-->

<p class="MsoNormal">Check out this video of the Russian Sukhoi PAK-FA
fifth-generation stealth fighter. There is some good footage of the jet
undergoing flight tests--my comprehension of the Russian language is virtually
non-existent, but I think the reporter is giving an overview of the jet's
capabilities.</p><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/_SPL8704-178151.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/_SPL8704-178151.html','popup','width=1654,height=1102,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/_SPL8704-thumb-560x373-178151.jpg" width="560" height="373" alt="_SPL8704.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><span style="font-size: 1em;">If I understood correctly--the PAK-FA has a lot of the same
features that you'd find on the F-22 or F-35 like embedded antennas and sensor
fusion. But the Russian aircraft seems to have automation to the point where it
can land itself if the pilot is incapacitated, but that could be my
misunderstanding.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p><span style="font-size: 1em;">If anyone speaks/understands Russian, I'm sure you'll get much
more out of this than me--but cool footage nonetheless. Incidentally, some of
the footage looks like spin testing, but unlike similar US testing you might
see at Edwards AFB or Pax River, the Russians don't seem to use a spin-chute.&nbsp;</span></p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/IfG0dr8cPRU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

<!--EndFragment--> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/sukhoi-paf-fa-spin-recovery-fo.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/sukhoi-paf-fa-spin-recovery-fo.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 04:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Pentagon procurement czar &apos;cautiously optimistic&apos; about F-35 production ramp up</title>
            <description><![CDATA[







<p class="MsoNormal">The Pentagon's top acquisitions official says that he is
cautiously optimistic that the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter has
made enough progress in its development to ramp up its production rates
starting in fiscal year 2015. </p><p class="MsoNormal">"At this point I can say that I'm cautiously optimistic that
we will be able to raise production as planned," says Frank Kendall, the
undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics. "The
development programme is executing close to plan, a couple of areas are
slipping a little bit in schedule, but the slips are not dramatic."</p><p class="MsoNormal">As such, Kendall says unless some sort of serious new
problem emerges, the Pentagon will be able to order a ramp-up in production of
the tri-service stealth fighter later this "fall". The decision would be
reflected in the President's 2015 budget proposal, he says, and will follow the
existing five-year spending plan. </p><p class="MsoNormal">That means the Pentagon will buy 42 planes in fiscal year 2015,
62 in 2016, 76 in 2017 and 100 in 2018. Production is currently running at 29
aircraft per year plus a few more for international customers.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Kendall says the while sequestration cuts are a problem, the
Pentagon will do everything it can to increase the F-35's production rates.
"The F-35 is our highest priority conventional warfare weapons system," he
says. "Because of that, we'll do everything we can to protect it."</p><p class="MsoNormal">Meanwhile is also good news on the sustainment costs, which
are projected to come down "significantly", Kendall says. The Pentagon is
working hard to reduce those lifecycle costs--which could involve adding
competition to sustaining the jet. "I think we will make a substantial dent in
the current projections," he says.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Kendall adds that the F-35's cost per flying hour should
decline significantly after a review he expects to conduct in the fall. The
current cost figures are based on older estimates by the Pentagon's Cost
Assessments and Program Evaluation office, he says, but those need to be
updated. "I can tell you that the number is coming down," Kendall says.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Kendall cautions, however, that the F-35 programme still has
a long way to go. The jet is only 40% of its way through its flight-test
programme, and there are still many aerodynamic and structural tests that have
still to be completed. <span style="mso-spacerun:
yes">&nbsp;</span>Additionally, software needs to be developed and weapons
integration needs to be tested. There are also fixes to problems that were
discovered earlier that need to be verified. </p><p class="MsoNormal">As always, software development could still be an issue. For
example a critical design review for the next software block has slipped by 45
days. But there has been "nothing dramatic" that might derail the programme.</p><p class="MsoNormal">"It's too early to declare victory," Kendall says, but the
programme is on a much more sound footing than it was two years ago. "There is
plenty of risk left in the programme."</p><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/8950779619_eafa1cc0af_z-178147.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/8950779619_eafa1cc0af_z-178147.html','popup','width=427,height=640,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/8950779619_eafa1cc0af_z-thumb-560x839-178147.jpg" width="560" height="839" alt="8950779619_eafa1cc0af_z.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a><p class="p1">






<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
  <o:AllowPNG/>
 </o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:TrackMoves>false</w:TrackMoves>
  <w:TrackFormatting/>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>
  <w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>
  <w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
  <w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
   <w:DontAutofitConstrainedTables/>
   <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/>
  </w:Compatibility>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="276">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->

<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
</style>
<![endif]-->



<!--StartFragment-->























<!--EndFragment--></p><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/pentagon-procurement-czar-caut.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/pentagon-procurement-czar-caut.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Joint Strike Fighter</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 23:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Chinese aerospace renaissance underway?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[






<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
  <o:AllowPNG/>
 </o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:WordDocument>
  <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
  <w:TrackMoves>false</w:TrackMoves>
  <w:TrackFormatting/>
  <w:PunctuationKerning/>
  <w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridHorizontalSpacing>
  <w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>18 pt</w:DrawingGridVerticalSpacing>
  <w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayHorizontalDrawingGridEvery>
  <w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>0</w:DisplayVerticalDrawingGridEvery>
  <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
  <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
  <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
  <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
  <w:Compatibility>
   <w:BreakWrappedTables/>
   <w:DontGrowAutofit/>
   <w:DontAutofitConstrainedTables/>
   <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx/>
  </w:Compatibility>
 </w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="276">
 </w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]-->

<!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
 /* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
	mso-style-noshow:yes;
	mso-style-parent:"";
	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
	mso-para-margin:0cm;
	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-ascii-font-family:Cambria;
	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
	mso-hansi-font-family:Cambria;
	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
</style>
<![endif]-->



<!--StartFragment-->

<p class="MsoNormal">During the first half of 2013 a couple of new Chinese
military aviation projects have come to light. One recent development was the
sighting of China's Sharp Sword unmanned combat air vehicle, which was revealed
in May. More recently, images have emerged of a structural model of what
appears to be a new Chinese stealth bomber.</p><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/sharpsword2-178122.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/sharpsword2-178122.html','popup','width=550,height=247,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/sharpsword2-thumb-560x251-178122.jpg" width="560" height="251" alt="sharpsword2.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 1em;">While many are tempted to dismiss the Chinese developments
as mere knock-offs based on stolen Western technologies, there are those who
believe that we, particularly those of us here in the United States, are
underestimating China's capabilities.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Having examined the Chinese designs, a number of highly
experienced US aerospace engineers--all of whom have extensive experience
designing low observable aircraft--are convinced that not only are the new
designs original, but that they are viable stealth airframes (even if they are
not all-aspect stealth machines in some cases). "There is an aerospace
renaissance underway in China," one engineer says.&nbsp; "It was just a matter of time."</p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/sharpsword-178125.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/sharpsword-178125.html','popup','width=427,height=147,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/sharpsword-thumb-560x192-178125.jpg" width="560" height="192" alt="sharpsword.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a><p class="MsoNormal">The Sharp Sword not only looks viable as a low observable
aircraft from many angles--save for the distinctly non-stealthy exhaust, it
looks like it is an original design, one engineer says.&nbsp; Asked about the structural model for
the Chinese stealth bomber, the engineer says that his unfortunate conclusion
is that the aircraft is in fact a viable design. </p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">While China is not yet an adversary of the Unites States,
there is potential that as the country continues to reemerge as a great
economic and military power that it could become one. In that case it would be
foolish to underestimate the capabilities of Chinese engineers. "They have
talented designers," one engineer says.</p><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Chinesestealthbombermodel-178128.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Chinesestealthbombermodel-178128.html','popup','width=476,height=211,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Chinesestealthbombermodel-thumb-560x248-178128.jpg" width="560" height="248" alt="Chinesestealthbombermodel.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a>

<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 1em;">If it does come down to some sort of new Cold War, this time
around the United States would be facing-off against an enemy with a vibrant
economy, as a learned friend notes--a marked contrast to the Soviet Union,
which was always hamstrung by its command economy.&nbsp;</span></p>

<!--EndFragment--> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/chinese-aerospace-renaissance.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/chinese-aerospace-renaissance.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Deep thoughts</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Industry Fads</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Source Watch</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Unmanned</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 06:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bell-Boeing awarded V-22 multi-year</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span lang="EN-GB">
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Bell-Boeing is being awarded a $4.89 billion contract modification to "definitize" a multi-year production contract for the V-22 Osprey tilt-rotor, the Pentagon announced 12 June. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The contract covers the manufacture and delivery of 92 MV-22 Ospreys for the US Marine Corps and seven CV-22 special operations aircraft for the US Air Force. But, moreover, it "definitizes" a previously "undefinitized" contact to build Lot 17 production aircraft and solidifies plans for the advance acquisitions of long lead items for the eighteenth production lot of Ospreys. According to the Pentagon release, the work will be completed in September 2019.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Boeing had said earlier that it was expecting to sign the multi-year contract for the V-22 on 13 June, which had been delayed to due budgetary squabbles within the US government. Company officials could not immediately comment on the contract award, but say they will make a statement on 13 June. <a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/5517548638_d09d6ea6eb_oV2-178116.html','popup','width=640,height=467,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/5517548638_d09d6ea6eb_oV2-178116.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="5517548638_d09d6ea6eb_oV2.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/5517548638_d09d6ea6eb_oV2-thumb-560x408-178116.jpg" width="560" height="408" /></a><o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p></span>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/bell-boeing-awarded-v-22-multi.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/bell-boeing-awarded-v-22-multi.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 22:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>F-35A AMRAAM launch video</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">This is a video footage of last weeks' F-35A AMRAAM launch. Enjoy.<a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F35_AAVI-177943.html','popup','width=1200,height=683,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F35_AAVI-177943.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="F35_AAVI.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F35_AAVI-thumb-560x318-177943.jpg" width="560" height="318" /></a>.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5EnttHIgx8s" frameborder="0" width="560" allowfullscreen></iframe>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/f-35a-amraam-launch-video.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/f-35a-amraam-launch-video.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Joint Strike Fighter</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>F-35A launches first AMRAAM</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<span lang="EN-GB">
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The Lockheed Martin F-35A Joint Strike Fighter made its first Raytheon AIM-120C5 AMRAAM launch earlier this week at Edwards AFB, California.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>The instrumented missile was launched from aircraft AF-1, which was flown by US Air Force Lt Col George Schwartz, over the Point Mugu Sea Test Range off the California coast.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F35_AAVI-177943.html','popup','width=1200,height=683,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F35_AAVI-177943.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="F35_AAVI.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F35_AAVI-thumb-560x318-177943.jpg" width="560" height="318" /></a>"The AIM-120 launch is one small, but critical increment toward proving combat capability," says F-35 weapons director Charlie Wagner. "We've spent years working on the design of the aircraft, and many months ensuring that weapons could be contained within the aircraft and dropped as designed."<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The significance of the AMRAAM launch is that it demonstrates a successful launch-to-eject communications sequence and firing of the weapon's rocket motor after its release. <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>The test will help pave the way for targeted launches later this year in support of Block 2B configuration, which will the first software load with actual combat capability. "We're rolling into a lot of additional weapons work in the coming months to put that expanded capability on the aircraft," Schwartz says.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Both the USAF and US Marine Corps will declare the F-35 operational with versions of the Block 2B (rehosted as Block 3i for the USAF) <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>software in 2016 and 2015 respectively. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Meanwhile, Kongsberg and Lockheed have completed a fit check of the Norwegian Joint Strike Missile (JSM) inside the internal weapons bay of the F-35. The weapon has already been fit checked on external pylons--those tests took place about four weeks ago.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p></span>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/f-35a-launches-first-amraam.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/f-35a-launches-first-amraam.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Joint Strike Fighter</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 20:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>We fly the A400M</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/fg-club/in-focus/A400m-flight-test/video/">As a Friday treat, FG Club members can enjoy an early read of Mike Gerzanics' excellent flight test report on the Airbus Military A400M</a>, which is incidentally the cover feature for <i>Flight International</i>'s main Paris air show edition. If you're not already registered, it's free and quick to do so, and well worth it.<div><br /></div><div>It's three months since we flew MSN6/"Grizzly 5" from Toulouse Blagnac, and as our video report shows, we really put the European transport through its paces. We didn't quite achieve the maximum 120˚ banked turn that some of you will have seen at air shows, but 105˚ still felt pretty sporty to me from the jump seat at the end of a 3<i>g</i> pull-up manoeuvre.</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/105%20560.jpg"><img alt="105 560.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/105 560-thumb-560x400-177937.jpg" width="560" height="400" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div><div>The A400M also proved to be pretty agile down low (sorry, but you'll have to go to the report page to watch the video for now).</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/07/Low%20560.jpg"><img alt="Low 560.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/Low 560-thumb-560x400-177939.jpg" width="560" height="400" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div><div>Mike's article tells you all about what the 37t payload capacity airlifter is like to fly, and <a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/a400m-delivery-to-launch-export-drive-says-airbus-military-386673/">you can catch up with the A400M's production and delivery status and export prospects in my news story published elsewhere on Flightglobal earlier this week</a>.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/we-fly-the-a400m.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/we-fly-the-a400m.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">A400M</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Airbus Military</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Flight test</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Grizzly</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Toulouse</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>AVX joins Bell, Sikorsky/Boeing for Army&apos;s JMR-TD development</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The US Army has picked AVX Aircraft Company's design for its high-speed Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator (JMR-TD) program. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">AVX, which was formed by Bell Helicopter veterans in 2005, says it is in negotiations with the service for a JMR-TD contract, which is expected to be awarded in mid-September. The company joins Bell and a joint Sikorsky/Boeing team in being selected for the program, which is expected to lead into the army's nascent Future Vertical Lift effort to replace the Sikorsky UH-60 and potentially the Boeing AH-64 Apache in the 2030s.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">"The AVX proposal offers the capabilities the Army wants for the future fleet of utility and attack aircraft at a very attractive price," the company says. Like the Sikorsky/Boeing design, AVX's proposed design is a coaxial-rotor compound machine.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/JMR MPS Attack Operational Suitability 300 (2)-177904.html','popup','width=1200,height=713,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/JMR MPS Attack Operational Suitability 300 (2)-177904.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="JMR MPS Attack Operational Suitability 300 (2).jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/JMR MPS Attack Operational Suitability 300 (2)-thumb-560x332-177904.jpg" width="560" height="332" /></a>AVX says it has teamed with "a number of experienced aerospace companies for development of the AVX JMR design", which the company claims will mean a lower price tag than the competing designs.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">Meanwhile, Piasecki, another smaller firm competing for the army's business, did the not make the grade. "Unfortunately Piasecki was NOT selected for the JMR-TD," the company says. Additionally, EADS North America dropped out of the program--it is not known if their design was found to be acceptable by the army or not.<a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/JMR MPS Utility Operational Suitability 300 (2)-177907.html','popup','width=1200,height=714,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/JMR MPS Utility Operational Suitability 300 (2)-177907.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="JMR MPS Utility Operational Suitability 300 (2).jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/JMR MPS Utility Operational Suitability 300 (2)-thumb-560x333-177907.jpg" width="560" height="333" /></a><o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/avx-joins-bell-sikorskyboeing.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/avx-joins-bell-sikorskyboeing.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Industry Fads</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>PICTURES: Why Norway wants the Joint Strike Missile</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Remember the fuss that Norway made about not committing to buying Lockheed Martin's F-35 until it got a promise to have Kongsberg's Joint Strike Missile (JSM) integrated for&nbsp;anti-ship and land attack missions? Well, new images released by the nation's defence ministry today provide a hint at why its was so insistent.<div><br /></div><div>The ship-launched Naval Strike Missile from which the JSM is being developed is now operational, following a successful (understatement of the week) firing performed from one of the navy's Skjold-class corvettes; possibly one of the coolest-looking surface vessels out there today.</div><div><br /></div><div>As the images below show, the weapon's live warhead made a significant mess of the retired Oslo-class frigate which served as its target during the end-to-end test.</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/06/during%20560.jpg"><img alt="during 560.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/during 560-thumb-560x329-177898.jpg" width="560" height="329" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div><div>The missile struck the ship's main superstructure, as shown clearly in the shot below.</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/after%20560.jpg"><img alt="after 560.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/after 560-thumb-560x325-177900.jpg" width="560" height="325" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div><div>A critical design review for the air-launched JSM will be conducted this summer, with the weapon expected to become operational from around 2020. It is intended to be carried internally by the Royal Norwegian Air Force's future F-35As, or in a less stealthy configuration (which I'd suggest is probably acceptable from a healthy standoff range of about 150nm, or 277km) with up to two under each wing. Exports are also a clear target.</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/F-35%20JSM%20560.jpg"><img alt="F-35 JSM 560.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/F-35 JSM 560-thumb-560x316-177902.jpg" width="560" height="316" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/pictures-why-norway-wants-the.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/pictures-why-norway-wants-the.html</guid>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">F-35</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Joint Strike Missile</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Kongsberg</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Norway</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 21:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>First RAF pilot performs vertical landing in F-35B</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/FirstRAFVerticalLanding-177823.html','popup','width=1200,height=721,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/FirstRAFVerticalLanding-177823.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="FirstRAFVerticalLanding.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/FirstRAFVerticalLanding-thumb-560x336-177823.jpg" width="560" height="336" /></a>Squadron Leader Jim Schofield is the first Royal Air Force pilot to complete a vertical landing in a Lockheed Martin F-35B. He completed that sortie on 28 May. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/first-raf-pilot-performs-verti.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/first-raf-pilot-performs-verti.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Joint Strike Fighter</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>2000th Apache video</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">Boeing posted these two videos about the 2000</font><sup><font size="2">th</font></sup><font size="3"> AH-64 Apache rolling-off the production line. I have to assume that number includes aircraft that have been remanufactured and redelivered because I don't think there have been nearly that many Apaches that have been built. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/ah-64e-177790.html','popup','width=1200,height=538,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/ah-64e-177790.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="ah-64e.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/06/ah-64e-thumb-560x251-177790.jpg" width="560" height="251" /></a>Let's see, our Army has something like 670 or there abouts, the Brits have 67 or so, Israel has 45, Japan has 10, the&nbsp;UAE has 30, Egypt has 35, Greece has 29, Kuwait has 16, the Saudis have a dozen, Singapore 19, the Dutch have 29 and if I recall, Taiwan has 30 or so on order. And India is allegedly buying 22 AH-64s... It's hard to say what's happening there with any degree of certainty.
<object id="flashObj" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="464" height="260"><param name="_cx" value="12276" /><param name="_cy" value="6879" /><param name="FlashVars" value="videoId=2321476162001&amp;playerID=1143560534001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAukPAlqE~,oAVq1qtdRjy50BF2MoxbX8ZeW4dvR47I&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="Movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&amp;isUI=1" /><param name="Src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&amp;isUI=1" /><param name="WMode" value="Window" /><param name="Play" value="0" /><param name="Loop" value="-1" /><param name="Quality" value="High" /><param name="SAlign" value="LT" /><param name="Menu" value="-1" /><param name="Base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="Scale" value="NoScale" /><param name="DeviceFont" value="0" /><param name="EmbedMovie" value="0" /><param name="BGColor" value="FFFFFF" /><param name="SWRemote" value="" /><param name="MovieData" value="" /><param name="SeamlessTabbing" value="0" /><param name="Profile" value="0" /><param name="ProfileAddress" value="" /><param name="ProfilePort" value="0" /><param name="AllowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="AllowFullScreenInteractive" value="" /><param name="IsDependent" value="0" />
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=2321476162001&playerID=1143560534001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAukPAlqE~,oAVq1qtdRjy50BF2MoxbX8ZeW4dvR47I&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="464" height="260" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<object id="flashObj" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="464" height="260"><param name="_cx" value="12276" /><param name="_cy" value="6879" /><param name="FlashVars" value="videoId=2321600962001&amp;playerID=1143560534001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAukPAlqE~,oAVq1qtdRjy50BF2MoxbX8ZeW4dvR47I&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="Movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&amp;isUI=1" /><param name="Src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&amp;isUI=1" /><param name="WMode" value="Window" /><param name="Play" value="0" /><param name="Loop" value="-1" /><param name="Quality" value="High" /><param name="SAlign" value="LT" /><param name="Menu" value="-1" /><param name="Base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="AllowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="Scale" value="NoScale" /><param name="DeviceFont" value="0" /><param name="EmbedMovie" value="0" /><param name="BGColor" value="FFFFFF" /><param name="SWRemote" value="" /><param name="MovieData" value="" /><param name="SeamlessTabbing" value="0" /><param name="Profile" value="0" /><param name="ProfileAddress" value="" /><param name="ProfilePort" value="0" /><param name="AllowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="AllowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="AllowFullScreenInteractive" value="" /><param name="IsDependent" value="0" />
<embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1&isUI=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashvars="videoId=2321600962001&playerID=1143560534001&playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAukPAlqE~,oAVq1qtdRjy50BF2MoxbX8ZeW4dvR47I&domain=embed&dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="464" height="260" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/2000th-apache-video.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/06/2000th-apache-video.html</guid>
            
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 23:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>F-35 IOC dates revealed</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The Pentagon is revealing the initial operational capability (IOC) dates for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) in a new report to the US Congress delivered on 31 May, as required by law. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The US Air Force, the largest US Department of Defense (DOD) customer for the tri-service jet, will declare its F-35A variant operational in 2016. "If the F-35 Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) Version 7 executes according to plan, Air Force F-35A IOC criteria could be met between August 2016 (Objective) and December 2016 (Threshold)," the report says. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><a onclick="window.open('http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/05/121015-F-zz999-876v2-177625.html','popup','width=1200,height=801,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" href="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/05/121015-F-zz999-876v2-177625.html"><img style="TEXT-ALIGN: center; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; DISPLAY: block" class="mt-image-center" alt="121015-F-zz999-876v2.jpg" src="http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/assets_c/2013/05/121015-F-zz999-876v2-thumb-560x373-177625.jpg" width="560" height="373" /></a>The USAF IOC date is a departure from the service's earlier insistence that it would require the full capabilities of the jet's final Block 3F configuration to declare IOC, which is expected to complete development in the later part of 2017 according to the Pentagon's 2012 F-35 selected acquisition report. That means that the USAF plans to declare IOC with either the earlier Block 2B software load or with Block 3i, which is the same configuration rehosted on newer avionics hardware. However, the report does not explicitly state which configuration the USAF will use upon declaring IOC.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The USAF criteria for IOC consists of standing up the first operational F-35A squadron equipped with between 12 and 24 aircraft and with enough train personnel "to conduct basic close air support (CAS), interdiction, and limited suppression and destruction of enemy air defense (SEAD/DEAD) operations in a contested environment."<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">However, the USAF does note it needs the full Block 3F capability later. "The criteria stated above will provide sufficient initial combat capability for the threat postulated in 2016," the report reads. "However, in order to meet the full spectrum of Joint warfighter requirements in future years, the Air Force will require the enhanced lethality and survivability inherent in Blocks 3F and beyond."<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">The US Marine Corps, meanwhile, is sticking to its plan to declare IOC with the Block 2B configuration in 2015. "</font><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt">If the F-35 IMS Version 7 executes according to plan, Marine Corps F-35B IOC criteria could be met between July 2015 (Objective) and December 2015 (Threshold)," the report states.<o:p></o:p></span></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt">The Marines will declare IOC when the first squadron of between 10 and 16 aircraft is trained and ready "</span><font size="3">to conduct CAS, offensive and defensive counter air, air Interdiction, assault support escort, and armed reconnaissance in concert with Marine Air Ground Task Force resources and capabilities". The USMC also requires the jet's Autonomic Logistic Information System V2 software to declare IOC. Like the USAF, the Marines require Block 3F for their future needs, the report says. <o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font size="3"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri">The US Navy however is holding firm on requiring the full Block 3F configuration for its F-35C IOC date. "If the F-35 IMS Version 7 executes according to plan, Navy F-35C IOC criteria could be met between August 2018 (Objective) and February 2019 (Threshold)," the report reads.</font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class="MsoNormal"><font color="#000000"><font face="Calibri"><font size="3">US</font><span style="LINE-HEIGHT: 115%; FONT-SIZE: 11.5pt">N F-35C IOC is expected to be declared when the first operational squadron of 10 aircraft is manned, trained, and equipped to conduct its assigned missions. "The aircraft will be in a Block 3F configuration with the requisite SDD [system development and demonstration] performance envelope and weapon clearances," the report reads.</span><font size="3"> The USN says that it must have the Block 3F configuration to deal with threats in the post-2018 environment.<o:p></o:p></font></font></font></p>
<p style="MARGIN: 12px auto 6px; DISPLAY: block; FONT: 14px Helvetica, Arial, Sans-serif; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none"><a style="TEXT-DECORATION: underline" title="View F-35_IOC_Joint_Report_FINAL[1].pdf on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/144894824/F-35-IOC-Joint-Report-FINAL-1-pdf">F-35_IOC_Joint_Report_FINAL[1].pdf</a></p><iframe id="doc_72468" class="scribd_iframe_embed" height="600" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/144894824/content?start_page=1&amp;view_mode=scroll&amp;show_recommendations=true" frameborder="0" width="100%" scrolling="no" data-aspect-ratio="undefined" data-auto-height="false"></iframe>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/05/f-35-ioc-dates-revealed.html</link>
            <guid>http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/the-dewline/2013/05/f-35-ioc-dates-revealed.html</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Joint Strike Fighter</category>
            
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 15:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
