February 2012 Archives

Data: How much will the EU ETS cost airlines in 2012?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
UK-based environmental campaigners Sandbag have used 2010 emissions data to estimate the cost to carriers of the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) in 2012. Shown along the bottom axis are the UK's top 20 emitting airlines, ranked highest to lowest starting from the left (scroll over the graph itself to see all 20).

View the original data here

Public split between Heathrow expansion and new hub

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Ken Livingstone,  Richard Gardner_Rex Features.jpg
If it came down to a choice between the two, the public would be fairly evenly split between supporting a third runway at Heathrow or a new airport in the Thames Estuary, according to a poll by the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. 

A quarter of the 1,000 people asked said they would favour the expansion of Heathrow as a way to tackle the UK's airport capacity crunch, while 21% said they would back the new estuary hub. 

When asked if they believed the government was right to block Heathrow's third runway, 35% thought it was the right decision and 32% the wrong one.


Livingstone reportedly said current mayor Boris Johnson would cause the "total collapse of the west London economy" if he succeeded with the plans.

Photo by Richard Gardner/Rex Features

Struggling to get your head round emissions trading?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Perhaps these little cartoon people can help:

Special report: Aviation and the environment

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

How nations opposed to the EU ETS could respond

| | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)
Moscow, KeystoneUSA-ZUMA_Rex Features.jpg

More detail has emerged about next week's meeting in Moscow of nations opposed to the European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS). Twenty-six countries are expected to take part in the meeting to discuss joint action against the EU's emissions trading scheme, which they say creates competitive distortion and breaks international law. Until now, all we knew was that were going to discuss taking "retaliatory measures" against the ETS. But a draft agenda has been leaked, which outlines some of the measures under consideration. According to the NY Times, those include:

Photo of Moscow by Keystone USA-ZUMA/Rex Features

Only ICAO has the answer (apparently)

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Smarties, Dave Penman_Rex Features.jpg
You think only Smarties have the answer? Think again

Pressure is mounting on the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) to come up with a global framework for tackling carbon emissions - and fast. Some people think this is the only way now to avert a trade war between Europe and the rest of the world over the EU's Emissions Trading System (ETS). Speaking ahead of the Singapore Airshow earlier today, IATA's Tony Tyler said: "In Brussels last week, I sensed a growing recognition that a global scheme, developed and implemented through ICAO, would provide a superior solution to the problem of airline emissions." 

But what is ICAO actually doing about it? Mark Watson is head of environmental affairs for Cathay Pacific and involved in UN climate change processes within ICAO. He says ICAO is in the process of assessing which market-based measures could form the basis of a global scheme, and has been doing work to quantify the potential emissions reductions and market distortions that may result under each scenario. 

The measures under discussion include: a global departure levy, setting fees for all departing passengers and for cargo; a global carbon levy, charged on fuel consumption; a global offsetting scheme; a global carbon levy and offsetting scheme combined; and finally, a global emissions trading system. 

"ICAO is undertaking a more detailed evaluation of the options by June this year in order to submit these proposals to council in 2013," says Watson. ICAO's secretary general, Raymond Benjamin, has also vowed to produce a proposal by the end of this year.

Lovely. Except, doesn't ICAO have around 190 member states? Many of whom will have directly opposing views on how carbon emissions should be regulated? It'll be interesting to see if Benjamin can actually achieve this within a year. 

Photo by Dave Penman/Rex Features

ETS 'could kick start US advanced biofuels industry'

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Rubbish dump, KPA_Zuma_Rex Features.jpg
Interesting blog post from one of the US Department of Defense's energy advisors, Kate Brandt, this weekend on how the EU ETS could kick start the American advanced biofuels industry. 

The industry has made some significant process, Brandt points out, but there are still no commercial scale advanced biofuel plants in the US. (Advanced biofuels, or "drop in" fuels, can be used in existing engines, but are cleaner burning than traditional jet fuels - oh and they can be made from things like municipal waste, hence the lovely photo of a dump in Mumbai.)

Now, she argues, airlines have an incentive to purchase biofuels to avoid paying a tax every time they fly to and from Europe. "In the short-term, airlines may see passing on the cost of the ETS to the customer as the easy solution but this would be a very unpopular long term solution."

On a related note, this paper prepared for the 27th roundtable on sustainable development, held at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's (OECD) headquarters last week, has a good breakdown of the arguments for and against biofuels, including advanced biofuels. 

Photo by KPA/Zuma/Rex Features

Aviation bad for the environment? Nonsense!

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Just came across this viral video from 2006 via @AviationBlogs on Twitter. Apparently green campaigners created Sir Montgomery Cecil, spokesman of the spoof pro-aviation lobbying group SPURT, to highlight government policy on aviation and airport expansion. Terrifying.

Environmental impacts of new UK hub 'as significant as' third runway at London Heathrow

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Thames Estuary_Heathrow.jpg
The overall local environmental impacts of a new, four-runway hub airport are likely to be at least as significant as a third runway at Heathrow and a second runway at Gatwick, according to a report by London First's Connectivity Commission (a group of business leaders). Read their arguments in favour of increasing airport capacity in the UK