Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Google Translate

Recent Assets

  • MS-21.jpg
  • EMB-145 birdstrike 3.jpg
  • EMB-145 birdstrike 2.jpg
  • EMB-145 birdstrike 1.jpg
  • Easyjet office.jpg
  • Luggage belt.jpg
  • Windscreen.jpg
  • Easyjet A319.jpg
  • kpae5194.jpg
  • 787 tailcone Matt Cawby pic.jpg

Now that explains the Airbus A318 approval at London City

Kieran Daly
 on February 1, 2008 9:08 AM | | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0) |

It was all very exciting, but it was also a bit of a mystery why Airbus would go to so much time and trouble to get the Airbus A318 certified for the steep approach to London City Airport. Now I suspect we know - it was so that British Airways could fly the smallest member of the Airbus family to New York...obviously.

The airline has this morning announced that it is going to launch twice-daily services from LCY to New York with two new A318s. They'll have 32 lie-flat seats and it will start some time next year.

This, to put it mildly, is something of a surprise move. But it's also a permanent niche market, albeit a disproportionately important one.
.
It will be a killer offer for a select constituency of people that value flying in and out of an airport located close to London's financial centre. And some business class flyers who currently use Heathrow may be tempted to switch: LCY is elegantly integrated into London's surface transportation in a way that makes it a viable alternative for a good chunk of the capital's citizens.

But perhaps more importantly, this plan seems to be dagger-aimed at the north London based premium-only offerings from EOS and Silverjet. LCY's catchment area overlaps substantially with that of Stansted and Luton.

However, one of the best things about LCY, as with so many secondary airports, is that not many people use it, relatively speaking, and the ones that do are generally competent travellers. This could be a very nice way to fly.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Now that explains the Airbus A318 approval at London City.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/20539

4 Comments

Big mistake -- this flight requires an enroute fuel stop??!!! When compared to anything else on the market LON-NYC that goes NONSTOP why the heck would any business traveler want to go out of LCY on a carrier that has to make a pitstop and land in NYC with a chunk of extra time to fuel added to the total flight time??? No thanks!!

Good point - addressed in Silverjet post above

City to Heathrow:

- Underground to Paddington - 30 minutes with one change
- 10 minutes walk to concourse
- Paddington to Heathrow - 15 minutes plus 7.5 minutes wait time

Journey time 62.5 minutes.

City to Docklands
- 23 minutes (no changes)
- five minutes walk
- Total journey time 28 minutes

Docklands journey time advantage 34.5 minutes.

Add on the hassle of changing 3 times and the usual mularkly of checking in at Heathrow it suddenly sounds quite attractive.

(And the tech stop is one-way. Even if you're put off by the westbound tech you can book east to LCY and return via LHR)


This offer will benefit only a group of people who travels a lot. It is so much harder and time consuming to travel with other people who are either for the first time taking a plane or with people going for vacation.

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!