Subscribe by E-mail

Archives

Google Translate

Recent Assets

  • MS-21.jpg
  • EMB-145 birdstrike 3.jpg
  • EMB-145 birdstrike 2.jpg
  • EMB-145 birdstrike 1.jpg
  • Easyjet office.jpg
  • Luggage belt.jpg
  • Windscreen.jpg
  • Easyjet A319.jpg
  • kpae5194.jpg
  • 787 tailcone Matt Cawby pic.jpg

FAA acts on definition of word 'airborne'

Kieran Daly
 on September 15, 2009 3:28 PM | | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0) |
There are some things in aviation that really shouldn't be left to chance and happily the world has the US FAA to make sure they aren't. You know, stuff like minimum equipment lists, pre-flight safety-briefings, definitions of words - such as 'airborne' for example.

Now, some of you may have believed you were pretty confident in your understanding of what the word airborne meant. And you may well have been right, but then again, some of you may not have been. So the FAA would like to clear up the fuzziness by stating that it means: "An aircraft is considered airborne when all parts of the aircraft are off the ground." (Be honest, were you right or wrong?)

By way of illustration, here is an airborne thing:

A380 take-off.jpg

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: FAA acts on definition of word 'airborne'.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.flightglobal.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/64174

3 Comments

So an aircraft which physically loses a part, for example an engine, isn't airborne?

A helicopter on a rooftop pad is airborne?

MT Kieran Daly

Depends how you define 'ground' - I understand they're working on that.

Leave a comment

Want a user picture? Get a Gravatar!