So, for those of you who haven't seen the story on the Flightglobal homepage, here's the model of the Comac C919 at the Asian Aerospace show in Hong Kong.

Looks like a sort of Bombraer-Boebus C7320.

All a bit of fun of course, but models and artist's impressions can
have odd consequences. I was at a press conference in about 1992 when
British Aerospace unveiled the proposed twin deriviative of the RJ
family. In the slightly dodgy drawings the nacelles were distinctly
flattened at the bottom leading to wild rumours that it was already
decided that it would be CFM56-powered. Not true, and all came to
nothing anyway.
Heavily updated after refreshing my memory: Then there was theNavy League Air Force Association show in Washington about the same time. Nobody knew what the planned, and hugely controversial Air Force version of the A-12 naval strike fighter
looked like. I went into the Lockheed General Dynamics booth to chat to the PR folks and
to my astonishment there was a model of it hanging from the ceiling. It
was a finless-pure delta design - quite astounding. With the PR guy's
agreement I sprinted off to find a photographer and literally hired a
woman snapper who I had never met as she walked among the exhibits.
By the time I got back to the booth a USN admiral had heard about the model and orderedLockheed GD to hide it forthwith. The Navy would decide
when and how to reveal the configuration was not amused by having the first A-12 model unveiled at an Air Force show, he told them. So my exclusive
was stillborn (not the only one.) Within a year Dick Cheney had finally
lost his sense of humour with the Pentagon and its then staggeringly
arrogant contractors and cancelled the programme. He and I would have
little common ground politically today, but it was a fine thing he did.
Also about the same time the whole world was desperate to see any kind of artist's material of the YF-22 and YF-23 stealth fighters which were built, but unrevealed. Lockheed went first with the YF-22 and released their own artist-s impression of the beast which, remember, was supposed to be the stealthiest thing in the sky. The image was duly released and published all over the place.
To my secret pleasure I learned a few months later that a mid-ranking Lockheed PR, who went onto greater things, had taken it upon himself to get the artist to add a couple of utterly imagined foreplanes. None of the world's alleged stealth experts (which certainly didn't include me) commented on this bizarre configuration. The F-22 went onto greater things too of course, and needless to say never did have foreplanes.
Heavily updated after refreshing my memory: Then there was the
By the time I got back to the booth a USN admiral had heard about the model and ordered
Also about the same time the whole world was desperate to see any kind of artist's material of the YF-22 and YF-23 stealth fighters which were built, but unrevealed. Lockheed went first with the YF-22 and released their own artist-s impression of the beast which, remember, was supposed to be the stealthiest thing in the sky. The image was duly released and published all over the place.
To my secret pleasure I learned a few months later that a mid-ranking Lockheed PR, who went onto greater things, had taken it upon himself to get the artist to add a couple of utterly imagined foreplanes. None of the world's alleged stealth experts (which certainly didn't include me) commented on this bizarre configuration. The F-22 went onto greater things too of course, and needless to say never did have foreplanes.

on September 7, 2009 5:08 PM | Reply
Looks pretty nice. The shape is a bit like an A321...maybe a worthy replacement for the 757? If western airlines can bring themselves to order from a manufacturer other than Boeing or Airbus. But i don't like what they have done with the outer cockpit windows - now the aircraft looks like it has really silly eyebrows. But as you say it's only a model...
Thanks for that and the story.
on September 7, 2009 11:46 PM | Reply
Very nice, it does indeed look like a 757, but I agree that the windows are pretty fugly, especially if it's got 4 front windows instead of 6. It would look DC-10ish if it has 6.
on September 26, 2009 9:39 PM | Reply
It is completely different from the Boeing 757. because 757 is short and ugly and COMAC C919 is much more prettier than that old Boeing aircraft.