FlightGlobal.com
Home
Premium
Archive
Video
Images
Forum
Atlas
Blogs
Jobs
Shop
RSS
Email Newsletters
You are in:
Home
Aviation History
1938
1938 - 2129.PDF
AIRCRAFT ENGINEER AND AIRSHIPS FlRST AERONAUTICAflXfcEKLY IN TmTWoRLD • FOUNDED 1909 Editor C M. POULSEN Managing Editor G. GEOFFREY SMITH ChieJ Photographer JOHN YOXALL Editorial, Advertising and Publishing Offices: DORSET HOUSE, STAMFORD STREET, LONDON, S.E1 Telesroma : Truditni. S.diit, Loudon. 8-10. CORPORATION ST.. COVENTRY. Telegrams: Autocar, Coventry. Telephone: Coventry 5210. GUILDHALL BUILDINGS NAVIGATION ST., BIRMINGHAM, 2 Telegrams: Autopress, Birmingham. Telephone: Midland 2971. SUBSCRIPTION Home and Canada: Year, £1 13 0. RATES: Other Countries: Year, «1 16 0. Telephone Waterloo 333 J (50 ineJ) 260, DEAN4GATE, MANCHESTER, 3 Telegrams: Iliffe, Manchester Telephone: Blackfriars 4412. iHB, RENF1ELD ST. GLASGOW, C.2. Telegrams: Iliffe, Glasgow Telephone: Central 4857 8 months, 163. Gd. 6 months, 18a. 0 I. 3 months, 8s. 64 3 months, 9s. ltd No. 1544. Vol. XXXIII. JULY 28, 1938. Thursdays, Price 6d The Outlook- The C.A.G. T HE Civil Air Guard scheme for cheaper flying instruc tion, announced by Sir Kingsley Wood on Saturday (and foreshadowed in Flight last week) is based upon an extension of the present light aeroplane club subsidy scheme. Clubs which are already subsidised will form a C.A.G. section, and those not already subsidised will be eligible provided they comply with certain requirements in the matter of aeroplanes and flying charges. The raison d'Stre of the C.A.G. scheme is, of course, to encourage, by lowering the hourly charges, many more people to take up flying, and it is not surprising that it has already met with an enthusiastic response all over the country. Basically the idea is commendable, but unless it is made perfectly clear from the very beginning that a very large percentage of the cheaply trained (cheaply to them selves, that is) pilots would, in time of emergency, be called upon to assist " in other directions concerned with aviation for which their services might be required " and not to do flying, there is likely to be ultimate disappoint ment and dissatisfaction. An "A" licence pilot who has been taught in a light plane provided with a minimum of equipment is not likely to be of much use if put on board one of the latest military aeroplanes, and will require a good deal of further training and practice, even if otherwise eligible, for ferry work or similar Service duties. The most that can be expected is that he (or she) will have become accustomed to being in the air and will have a certain amount of experience in judging height and speed during the apprcach to land. W7ea/< Points T HE idea of putting C.A.G. members into "a special brown overall with a specially designed ' Civil Air Guard ' badge on the pocket'' is not likely to make for harmony in those clubs at which some members are trained'on the existing basis and have not undertaken to offer their services in a national emergency. None of us •hkes to be made conspicuous, and it would be better were this part of the scheme omitted. From the clubs' point of view the C.A.G. plan is likely to prove a financial success, and after the lean time many of the clubs have had none will grudge them their four years of relative plenty. With a grant of ^50 instead of £25 for "A" licences on standard training types, and £30 for those on light aircraft types, the new hourly rates of 10s. and 5s. at week-ends and 5s. and 2s. 6d. during the week should suffice. But the quadrupling of the flying grant for post-licence flying, attractive as it lcoks, is largely nullified by the limit of ten hours per annum. It is difli cult to see why such an absurd limit has been fixed. Ten hours' flying a year after obtaining the " A " licence is no use to anyone, either the pilot or the country, and fifty hours would have been more reasonable. Probably the assumption is that after a pupil has obtained his licence and has done his ten hours' flying afterwards, at the cheap rates, he will be willing to pay standard rates for the rest of his flying. That assumption seems to us a very doubtful one, and it is precisely the post-licence flying that is valu able. In fact, we would go further and say that it would have been better to have kept the pre-licence hourly rates higher and to make post-licence flying really cheap. That is where the shoe pinches, as evidenced by the large number of " A" licence pilots who have in the past given up flying after getting their "tickets." The decision that "aircraft of foreign manufacture may be used, though their use will be reviewed after about four years" is typical of the panic measures which the Air Ministry is now adopting right and left. Why, in the name of common sense, foreign aircraft manufacturers should be allowed to benefit is difficult to understand. That we should go to America for training types on which to tra:n pilots for the R.A.F. direct was perhaps just understand able. But to go abroad for machines on which to train ~" A " licence pilots, the usefulness of the majority of whom will be extremely limited, is quite absurd, and totally unjust to our own manufacturers of light aircraft, as well as being entirely unnecessary. Canadian Coordination W HATEVER may be one's views of the wisdom or necessity of buying aeroplanes in America, no one can fail to applaud the decision to place orders for military aircraft in Canada. Nobody, the British aircraft industry least of all, minds Canada doing its bit towards
Sign up to
Flight Digital Magazine
Flight Print Magazine
Airline Business Magazine
E-newsletters
RSS
Events