FlightGlobal.com
Home
Premium
Archive
Video
Images
Forum
Atlas
Blogs
Jobs
Shop
RSS
Email Newsletters
You are in:
Home
Aviation History
2003
2003 - 1759.PDF
sign technology AERODYNAMICS Colour tool MICHAEL PHELAN /LONDON Just as computer-aided design software has pervaded today's aircraft structures design offices, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is gaining the respect of aerodynamicists for its ability to speed up aerofoil selection. While useful for trade-off studies, for years the tool was regarded suspiciously by tradi tional aerodynamicists due to its often untrustworthy absolute results, earning it the nickname "colour for directors" because of the elaborate flow visualisations it could generate. Now, as the computer forms as much a part of final aircraft shape definition as the windtun- nel, engineers are tackling one of the most challenging modelling requirements - com plex high-lift systems on transport aircraft. One of the objectives of the European Union's three-year European High Lift pro gramme (Eurolift), which concluded at the end of last year under the EU's Fifth-Framework research programme, was to improve the abil ity of CFD methods to model high-lift flow. The work extended the 2D research of the earlier Garteur programme to a 3D Airbus A310-rep- resentative wing shape and focused on flow conditions up to flight Reynolds numbers. Traditionally, CFD programmes have diffi culty in converging on high-lift flow solutions, mainly because of the widely varying flow speeds involved. The modelling of turbulence at high Reynolds numbers must accurately simulate large areas of flow separation, re circulation zones and wake effects. CFD tends to underpredict low Reynolds number lift due to grid-resolution issues and leading-edge suction-peak underprediction. However, at maximum lift conditions at high angles of attack, numerical methods tend to overpredict lift due to the difficulty of recreat ing stall behaviour. High-lift flow contains both low-speed and transonic regions, so finding a steady-state solution, especially in the transi tion regions, can be difficult. For this reason windtunnel data is still the prime method of evaluating a wing's high-lift and maximum-lift performance. The Eurolift programme compared results for the A310 wing obtained from several European manufactur ers' CFD methods to windtunnel results, including flight Reynolds number results obtained from the European Transonic Windtunnel in Cologne, Germany. The programme looked at grid-generation algo rithms, turbulent flow transition prediction and solver accuracy and efficiency. Results pub lished by Germany's DLR, Sweden's FOI defence research agency and France's ONERA show that the inaccuracies can be overcome with intelligent grid generation and by applying appropriate solver preconditions - essentially "forcing" certain transition conditions. One conclusion was that efficient grid gener ation, structured or unstructured, can be invaluable in increasing the accuracy and effi ciency of the solving process. More interestingly, aerodynamicists may be able to get away with imperfect flow representations and coefficient of pressure distributions, provid ing the CFD solution matches the total lift at high angles of attack. By using the knowledge that the magnitude, if not the detailed solution, is correct, designers may be able to cut down windtunnel work, beginning testing further into the preliminary design process, saving costs. A310 LANDING CONFIGURATtOl* DISTRIBUTION, ALPHA = 12.2° Experimental data Standard k-co model Explicit Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model Reynolds Stress Model 80 100 FLIGHT www.fliqhtinternational.com FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL 8-14 JULY 2003 33
Sign up to
Flight Digital Magazine
Flight Print Magazine
Airline Business Magazine
E-newsletters
RSS
Events
