Why the Max grounding challenged principle of mutual recognition

Boeing's Renton 737 production line

Source: Boeing

When the Boeing 737 Max was barred from the airspace of several countries by national authorities, a question arose as to whether this amounted to breaching a fundamental principle of ICAO – that of mutual recognition of airworthiness certification.

National authorities have the right to act against aircraft on their own register. But in March 2019 a number of civil aviation regulators prohibited all 737 Max services in their airspace, regardless of their operator, even as the US FAA resisted suspending its type certificate and grounding the aircraft.

This appeared to contradict an ICAO tenet enshrined in Article 33 of the Chicago Convention, that certificates of airworthiness issued or rendered valid by the state of registry shall be recognised as valid by other states.

Keep reading this article by becoming a FlightGlobal member now


FlightGlobal Premium Digital

You have reached your limit of free articles for this period. Register for a FREE account to read this article and benefit from:

  • Increased access to online news and in-depth articles from:
  • FlightGlobal Premium covering the global aviation industry
  • Airline Business providing insight for business leaders
  • Weekly newsletters on topics across the industry

Join now